And the likelihood that it was the other guy is what per-cent, exactly?
Or do we just assume that the probability that it’s Martin is over 48%?
Sorry, guys, that’s not the way science is done - it’s just about got to be one of the two, and if you’re doing voice analysis, the least that should be done is to do the same analysis on *both* voices, and assess the relative probabilities.
If that was done, and the numbers say it’s three times as likely its Martin rather than Zimmerman, that might mean something. And if it was twice as likely that it’s Zimmerman rather than Martin, that might mean something as well.
But just trying to voice match one of the guys? - sorry, too much possible error to be worth much, IMHO.
This is the same kind of magic computer program that constitutes “scientific” proof of global warming or climate change or whatever the Hell they are calling it today.