Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GSA Administrator Johnson resigns
CNN ^ | 04/02/2012 | Lesa Jansen

Posted on 04/02/2012 10:05:06 PM PDT by Dr.Deth

The head of the General Services Administration resigned Monday after a scathing report which called government spending on a training seminar in Las Vegas "excessive, wasteful, and in some cases impermissible." In some election-year damage control, the White House quickly put out a statement that President Obama was “outraged” when he found out about the spending.

GSA Administrator Martha Johnson admitted in a letter of resignation that her agency had made a "significant mis-step" and that "taxpayer dollars were squandered."

(more)

(Excerpt) Read more at whitehouse.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corrupt; partyalldatime
Corruption on a grand scale. You suspected it, here's more proof.

Good luck seeing the 75K clowns on the evening news.

1 posted on 04/02/2012 10:05:11 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

I work for the DoD and we can’t even get office supplies any more and these asshats are party’n it up in Vegas?


2 posted on 04/02/2012 10:08:05 PM PDT by FrogMom (There is no such thing as an honest democrat!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

obama


3 posted on 04/02/2012 10:09:20 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

soetoro


4 posted on 04/02/2012 10:10:33 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth
Two additional points. As CNN themselves point out:

"Martha Johnson came into her position amid controversy. Her appointment as head of the GSA was held up for 10 months through an arcane Senate procedure known as the “hold” where one senator can delay a nomination without reason. When Johnson was finally confirmed by the Senate in 2010 the White House touted it as an example of why Americans are so frustrated with Washington."

The other, is that her stated #1 priority when she came to run GSA, was that the agency should have a zero-enivironmental footprint. Not that is should be frugal with taxpayer dollars, or not pay for elephants in Las Vegas.

5 posted on 04/02/2012 10:10:39 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

Or whatever he calls his damned islamist self.


6 posted on 04/02/2012 10:11:32 PM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onedoug
Or whatever he calls his damned islamist self.

"Obama Been Lyin'"

7 posted on 04/02/2012 10:13:18 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FrogMom
I'm not joking about their environmentalist mission, check Executive Order (EO) 13514

Green GSA

8 posted on 04/02/2012 10:19:42 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

The white arab probably approved it.


9 posted on 04/02/2012 10:42:36 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth
In some election-year damage control, the White House quickly put out a statement that President Obama was “outraged” when he found out about the spending.

LOL, that stinking POS Ubama should get an Oscar!

10 posted on 04/02/2012 10:50:00 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Do you really believe Obama is against spending, Lancey?


11 posted on 04/02/2012 10:52:38 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

My bad. If Obama can pull off the “I’m against this spending” thing he’s a Svengali.

Oh wait. We already established that.


12 posted on 04/02/2012 10:55:15 PM PDT by Dr.Deth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

A mis-step, oh, so that’s the new word for stealing.


13 posted on 04/02/2012 11:20:36 PM PDT by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

It doesn’t seem like all that much to me. Catering for $100 a head? Sure, if that’s a for a single meal it’s a bit much, but if that’s for a 3 day conference it doesn’t seem that bad. In any event; it’s all a drop in the bucket. As long as we refuse to deal with the real budgetary issues we’ll continue to be sidetracked by nonsense like conference expenses and earmarks.


14 posted on 04/03/2012 12:26:01 AM PDT by eclecticEel (Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness: 7/4/1776 - 3/21/2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

Somebody call me when the President is “outraged” at the First Lady’s spending.


15 posted on 04/03/2012 1:47:07 AM PDT by greatvikingone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

As an employee at GSA, we would hear this propaganda everyday.


16 posted on 04/03/2012 3:57:25 AM PDT by scbison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson