Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Again! WH warns of 'unprecedented' SCOTUS ruling
Washington Examiner ^ | 4/4/2012 | Joel Gehrke Commentary Staff Writer

Posted on 04/04/2012 1:06:43 PM PDT by tellw

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: allmost

The j@rk0ff grew up in Indonesia.

Our system is just noise, just crap on his shoe.


81 posted on 04/04/2012 4:31:51 PM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Despite your a polarizing implication, the Precedent may be AC-DC, butt he currently isn't being directly rectified.

That comes after November.

82 posted on 04/04/2012 4:53:01 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (GunWalker: Arming "a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as well funded")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Fitzy_888

So what does the judge do if there is no letter - hold the entire Dept of Justice in contempt?
Lock em up and throw away the key?

Works for me!!


83 posted on 04/04/2012 4:54:10 PM PDT by djf (Obama - the "OJ verdict" of presidents!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

I cannot argue with your statement.


84 posted on 04/04/2012 5:16:57 PM PDT by allmost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: guardian_of_liberty
Obama was not a professor. He was a lecturer. The difference is like between a master craftsman and a rookie apprentice. Carney lied again, right there.
85 posted on 04/04/2012 5:28:13 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Rectify? Damn near killed ‘em!

/s


86 posted on 04/04/2012 6:02:32 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bunster

interesting coincidence


87 posted on 04/04/2012 6:17:30 PM PDT by omega4179
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Mouton

” Now, in the old time usage of the word Professor, he would probably qualify. That usage was a professor was the guy who played the piano in a whore house.”

LMAO!!


88 posted on 04/04/2012 6:21:21 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; sickoflibs; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3

“instructor” = “student teacher”

My dad was a full professor....I know the hierarchy.


89 posted on 04/04/2012 6:30:30 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: guardian_of_liberty

He actually wasn’t a professor, but a lecturer.


90 posted on 04/04/2012 6:35:47 PM PDT by Belle22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tellw
and he was a law professor

That is a lie. He was NEVER a Law Professor. He taught a class. I suspect that everyone he taught flunked the bar.

91 posted on 04/04/2012 7:50:26 PM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw

the hairsplitting begins. the devil is conversant in the details.


92 posted on 04/04/2012 8:03:28 PM PDT by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw

Piss poor politics to likely alienate Kennedy (if he was leaning or undecided)


93 posted on 04/04/2012 8:23:22 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Tawana Brawley, Anita Hill, King Rodney, OJ, Duke Lacrosse, Thugvon Martin. See a pattern?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 70th Division
I was interested because of your post on this. their is a liberal talk show host that points to an 1809 case(I don't have the right year) where the supreme court took power from congress by taking the power from the constitution that they could not only rules on the basis of whether a law was accurately applied but whether it was even constitutional or not.

I'm wondering if you feel or any other posters feel that the Supreme Court usurped this power.

94 posted on 04/04/2012 8:47:46 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: guardian_of_liberty

More accurately: a guest lecturer on the 14 th amendment. No more than that.


95 posted on 04/04/2012 9:35:36 PM PDT by chiller (Elect another batch of TPartiers and it won't matter which R we elect. WE will lead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
“instructor” = “student teacher” My dad was a full professor....I know the hierarchy.

Yes, you were the one who taught me that O. was not actually a "professor."

I am beginning to suspect that leftists have different standards.... Camille Paglia described how the leftist faculty members all give "excellent" ratings to each other's "works."

96 posted on 04/04/2012 10:47:16 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
There is enough corruption and treason to fill many courts for many days. Leavenworth needs to get ready. Those who survive this unraveling will spend much time there.

Why should they spend much time there at all? On the other hand, the Federal Execution Chamber at Terre Haute, IN might be more than a little busy, at the end of all this...

the infowarrior

97 posted on 04/04/2012 10:51:06 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Maceman

FWIW:
How many laws has the US Supreme Court declared unconstitutional?


Good to have on hand when they start screaming.


98 posted on 04/04/2012 10:54:04 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Almondjoy
their is a liberal talk show host that points to an 1809 case(I don't have the right year) where the supreme court took power from congress by taking the power from the constitution that they could not only rules on the basis of whether a law was accurately applied but whether it was even constitutional or not.

Marbury v Madison, 1803...

the infowarrior

99 posted on 04/04/2012 10:54:30 PM PDT by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RavenLooneyToon

I agree. Good points and perspective.

This evil bastard will get away with as much as he’s allowed.....and so far he’s gotten away with a devestating amount.


100 posted on 04/04/2012 11:00:32 PM PDT by unkus (Silence Is Consent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson