Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lacey
Obama knew about the power of the SCOTUS to strike down laws as unconstitutional...any law student would know this. However, Obama's outburst was purely from Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals
. Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.

Obama may well have been leaked the results of last week's vote and Obamcare is going down 5 to 4. To respond he must demonize the SCOTUS.

17 posted on 04/05/2012 7:04:11 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("The problem with socialism is that pretty soon you run out of other people's money" M. Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Great RJ

I’m not convinced he has inside knowledge of the vote, I think he made these statements to hedge his bets. If it happens that SCOTUS upholds the law Obama will be seen by his base as a strong leader who backed SCOTUS into a corner and forced it to do his bidding. If the law is struck down he still has his villain to run against.


20 posted on 04/05/2012 7:17:55 AM PDT by cbvanb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: The Great RJ

Yep, just trying to set / control the narrative.


24 posted on 04/05/2012 7:49:30 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Steyn: "If Greece has been knocking back the ouzo, we're face down in the vat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: The Great RJ

“Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
Obama may well have been leaked the results of last week’s vote and Obamcare is going down 5 to 4. To respond he must demonize the SCOTUS.”

To what end? So that the 2012 Demo campaign can say: YOU MUST RE-ELECT US SO THAT WE CAN CHANGE THE 5-4 MAJORITY TO A LIBERAL 5-4 MAJORITY BY APPOINTING MORE LIBERALS TO THE SUPREME COURT. Then there will be no need for us to question the authority of the court performing judicial review.


29 posted on 04/05/2012 8:11:37 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson