Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/05/2012 10:22:40 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Free ThinkerNY

I just love this.


2 posted on 04/05/2012 10:24:34 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Any links to the actual 3 page single spaced letter yet?


3 posted on 04/05/2012 10:28:04 AM PDT by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
I want to see how he parsed it!

Mike

5 posted on 04/05/2012 10:39:12 AM PDT by MichaelP (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools ~HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
From's today statement:

Holder said "the power of the courts to review the constitutionality of legislation is beyond dispute," though it should only be exercised in "appropriate cases."

More controversy?

6 posted on 04/05/2012 10:45:08 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Meanwhile, in unreported news, Holder is still trying to stone-wall his way out of responsibility for the Fast & Furious conspiracy. Will he succeed? Won’t he? Only the Republicrats in the Senate know, and they’re not saying.


7 posted on 04/05/2012 10:46:06 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Review of what obamma said:

"I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress," Obama said on Monday. "And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well, this is a good example. And I'm pretty confident that this court will recognize that and not take that step."

8 posted on 04/05/2012 10:47:50 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Bari's whole administration must dread those moments off-prompter!

Who will be called upon to have to explain this time? hehe

It was Jay Caney today and he was laughed at to his face.

There is a reason they write speeches for him to read.

9 posted on 04/05/2012 11:23:21 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson