Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holder assures judge of administration's respect
Associated Press ^ | April 5, 2012

Posted on 04/05/2012 10:22:38 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

WASHINGTON (AP) -- In a letter written at the request of a federal appellate judge, Attorney General Eric Holder is providing assurances that the Obama administration respects the decisions that courts make.

The attorney general wrote the letter after appeals court judge Jerry Smith in Texas asked Holder to reassure him that the Justice Department recognizes judicial authority.

(Excerpt) Read more at hosted.ap.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; bhofascism; democrats; holder; obama; scotus; youlie

1 posted on 04/05/2012 10:22:40 AM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I just love this.


2 posted on 04/05/2012 10:24:34 AM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Any links to the actual 3 page single spaced letter yet?


3 posted on 04/05/2012 10:28:04 AM PDT by Harley (Will Rogers never met Harry Reid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harley
I was kind of expecting one short paragraph acknowledging the validity of Marbury v. Madison, then two and a half pages discussing the wrongs of Dred Scott, Plessy v. Ferguson, Bush v. Gore, and Citizens United.

Or else a letter that was 3 lines long instead of three pages long.

4 posted on 04/05/2012 10:38:50 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
I want to see how he parsed it!

Mike

5 posted on 04/05/2012 10:39:12 AM PDT by MichaelP (The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools ~HS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
From's today statement:

Holder said "the power of the courts to review the constitutionality of legislation is beyond dispute," though it should only be exercised in "appropriate cases."

More controversy?

6 posted on 04/05/2012 10:45:08 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Meanwhile, in unreported news, Holder is still trying to stone-wall his way out of responsibility for the Fast & Furious conspiracy. Will he succeed? Won’t he? Only the Republicrats in the Senate know, and they’re not saying.


7 posted on 04/05/2012 10:46:06 AM PDT by Standing Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Review of what obamma said:

"I'm confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress," Obama said on Monday. "And I'd just remind conservative commentators that for years what we've heard is the biggest problem on the bench was judicial activism or a lack of judicial restraint, that an unelected group of people would somehow overturn a duly constituted and passed law. Well, this is a good example. And I'm pretty confident that this court will recognize that and not take that step."

8 posted on 04/05/2012 10:47:50 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Bari's whole administration must dread those moments off-prompter!

Who will be called upon to have to explain this time? hehe

It was Jay Caney today and he was laughed at to his face.

There is a reason they write speeches for him to read.

9 posted on 04/05/2012 11:23:21 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harley

This looks to be it

http://cache.abovethelaw.com/uploads/2012/04/Eric-Holder-response.pdf

Don’t know anything about the website though


10 posted on 04/06/2012 10:59:18 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Federalist 78 paragraphs 12-13, “If it be said that the legislative body are themselves the constitutional judges of their own powers...” Enjoy.

Holder claiming judicial review “should only be exercised in ‘appropriate cases.’” is an insult.


11 posted on 04/06/2012 11:05:20 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson