Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coast Guard fires on Japanese ghost ship [not a WW II thread]
mynorthwest.com ^ | 4/5/2012 | unknown

Posted on 04/05/2012 6:34:25 PM PDT by matt1234

The U.S. Coast Guard unleashed cannon fire Thursday at a Japanese vessel set adrift by last year's tsunami, stopping the ship's long, lonely voyage across the Pacific Ocean.

A Coast Guard cutter fired on the abandoned 164-foot Ryou-Un Maru in the waters of the Gulf of Alaska and more than 150 miles from land, spokesman Paul Webb said.

Soon after the cannon fire started, the ship burst into flames, began to take on water and list, Chief Petty Officer Kip Wadlow said.

About two hours later, the vessel hadn't sunk and the cutter resumed shelling, Lt. Veronica Colbath said.

The vessel poses a significant hazard and the Coast Guard has been warning mariners to stay away, Wadlow said. Aviation authorities are also advising pilots to steer clear of the area.

Officials decided to sink the ship rather than risk the chance of it running aground or endangering other vessels.

(Excerpt) Read more at mynorthwest.com ...


TOPICS: Canada; Japan; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; blowedup; canada; japan; tsunami; tsunamidebris
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
No word on whether the ghosts fired back.
1 posted on 04/05/2012 6:34:36 PM PDT by matt1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: matt1234

We should’ve towed it back to Iron Bottom Sound off Guadalcanal.


2 posted on 04/05/2012 6:36:39 PM PDT by gorush (History repeats itself because human nature is static)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

It looks a bit rusty, but I wonder why they didn’t board, tow, and salvage it?

At the least, it’s quite a bit of scrap metal.


3 posted on 04/05/2012 6:38:21 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

>It looks a bit rusty, but I wonder why they didn’t board, tow, and salvage it?

Because salvage makes sense.


4 posted on 04/05/2012 6:40:27 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Cost of salvage towing (manpower, fuel, etc) probably far exceeds scrap value.


5 posted on 04/05/2012 6:42:51 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

“About two hours later, the vessel hadn’t sunk and the cutter resumed shelling, Lt. Veronica Colbath said. “

Why can’t the coast guard sink an abandoned vessel? Should we be concerned about this?


6 posted on 04/05/2012 6:47:31 PM PDT by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Article says a Canadian ship attempted salvage but was unsuccessful.


7 posted on 04/05/2012 6:47:31 PM PDT by matt1234 (Bring back the HUAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

This may be a stupid question, but do we know whether or not there are human remains onboard?


8 posted on 04/05/2012 6:48:32 PM PDT by lauraw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
Well in all seriousness, I wonder if there are not some WWII-era Japanese soldiers still entrenched on some deserted islands, thinking that we are at war.

Granted, they would be close to 90 years old by now but in tropical climes, they are probably still in reasonably good health. My advice is to stay away from those islands because if they saw some Americans walking around, they would probably be pissed. Especially if they were attired in tourist garb, like Hawaiian shirts, Bermuda shorts and deck shoes.

9 posted on 04/05/2012 6:48:41 PM PDT by SamAdams76 (I am 35 days away from outliving Phil Hartman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer
Why can’t the coast guard sink an abandoned vessel?

I was troubled by that, too. Sounds like the gunners need the practice. I bet it was fun.

10 posted on 04/05/2012 6:49:19 PM PDT by matt1234 (Bring back the HUAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RFEngineer

They should have waited another week before trying to sink this ship.


11 posted on 04/05/2012 6:50:00 PM PDT by 1_Rain_Drop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lauraw
This may be a stupid question, but do we know whether or not there are human remains onboard?

Valid question. A boarding party should have searched the vessel before sinking her. Not sure if that was done.

12 posted on 04/05/2012 6:51:31 PM PDT by matt1234 (Bring back the HUAC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: lauraw

The vessel was waiting to be scraped when it was in Japan.

I did see a video clip of what looked like a USCG RHIB alongside for inspection.


13 posted on 04/05/2012 6:55:02 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: matt1234

Who you gonna call?


14 posted on 04/05/2012 6:55:34 PM PDT by bunkerhill7 (who??? ? ?? Who knew?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency studied the problem and decided it is safer to sink the ship and let the fuel evaporate in the open water

Safer than what?
15 posted on 04/05/2012 6:58:33 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
Valid question. A boarding party should have searched the vessel before sinking her. Not sure if that was done.

And once the search was done they could have placed a shaped charge that would have blown a nice hole in it for a lot less money than a bunch of artillery shells.

16 posted on 04/05/2012 7:00:03 PM PDT by Oshkalaboomboom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: matt1234
About two hours later, the vessel hadn't sunk and the cutter resumed shelling,
Lt. Veronica Colbath said. This time, the Coast Guard used 50 mm shells.


"Did we give up when the Germans attacked Dutch Harbor?"

17 posted on 04/05/2012 7:00:13 PM PDT by TigersEye (Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
I was hopeful but that's what the Canadians decided.

I thought that would be a fun thing to own if you had the resources and knowhow to navigate and maintain it. Immediately thought houseboat.

18 posted on 04/05/2012 7:13:45 PM PDT by Aliska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OneWingedShark
NO, because salvage, cutting it up for scrap, cost more than it's worth.
19 posted on 04/05/2012 7:17:53 PM PDT by IMR 4350
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

If explosives are AN option then explosives are THE answer.


20 posted on 04/05/2012 7:20:40 PM PDT by Eaker (Remember, the enemy tends to wise up at the least convenient moments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson