Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York needs a microstamping law to combat gun violence
NY Daily News ^ | april 13, 2012

Posted on 04/13/2012 9:37:13 AM PDT by lowbridge

New York must require microstamping of all semiautomatic handguns —the criminals’ weapon of choice —that are made or sold in the state.

Manufacturers would etch a number on each gun’s firing pin, which would stamp that number onto the shell casing when the weapon is fired. Two years ago, California passed a similar law that has yet to take full effect.

If microstamping were in force, shell casings found at crime scenes would become calling cards —easily traced back to the gun that shot them and, therefore, to its registered owner.

The technology in no way interferes with anyone’s Second Amendment rights. Hunting rifles would not be affected at all. And why should a law-abiding handgun owner care if his or her shell casings bear an identifying mark?

Meanwhile, microstamping would give a powerful tool to police —who regularly discover shell casings that traditional ballistic fingerprinting can’t trace.

Up against these common-sense arguments, the gun nuts have gone ballistic in Albany.

(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: banglist; democrats; guncontrol; guns; liberalmedia; mediabias; microstamping; newyork; secondamendment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last
To: lowbridge

You mean their super tough gun regulations haven’t worked!
I think it’s time The City of New York complied with the second amendment.


81 posted on 04/13/2012 8:15:25 PM PDT by upcountryhorseman (An old fashioned conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge

This is just another attempt by the leftist aka progressive gun haters to ban guns.


82 posted on 04/14/2012 11:59:07 AM PDT by DMG2FUN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldMissileer

Nah...not necessary. I have a good idea of what it looks like. I’ve seen others and wouldn’t use one myself. Unless I had some reason to...like avoiding detection or eventual capture. Hypothetically speaking of course.


83 posted on 04/15/2012 8:04:03 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I will not comply. I will NEVER submit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson