[Oldeconomybuyer]

[P.O.E.]

[freedumb2003]

>> move science education advocates say could make it easier for creationism and global warming denial to enter U.S. classrooms.<<

The two are not analogous. TToE is a Scientific Theory. AGW is not (it meets exactly zero Scientific Theory criteria).

Just to make it clear, there are rigorous definitions of what a Scientific Theory is. The AGW “scientists” ignored all of them when labeling it a Scientific Theory. They were more interested in the politics and the money. Lots and lots and lots of money, just for cherry-picking data to produce the desire result.

And, no, a Theory is NOT a “grown up guess.” It is a scientific explanation of a large body of data and, as I said, has a series of rigorous tests (all of which TToE meets).

Beyond that, unless someone wants more information about how real science works, I sayeth nothing more.

[USFRIENDINVICTORIA]

The Tennessee law means that actual science will be taught in science classes. Prohibiting discussion about alternative theories -- even distinctly "unscientific" theories, is the antithesis of science.

[Persevero]

Good.

[Uncle Slayton]

Make it Parental Option and have parents decide if they want their kids to be taught Evolution or Creationism in school.