Posted on 04/16/2012 3:09:21 PM PDT by Eleutheria5
A writer tells the members of the Christ at the Checkpoint organization that they really must be more consistent - and also accept the resulting conclusions.
Dear Committee of “Christ at the Checkpoint” Conference,
I recently read the written materials of your latest conference in March and was thunderstruck by the assumption (...it is not an assumption any more, but a dogma, in which everyone in your community has to believe) that Jewish people never lived here, and that the whole history of this land is Palestinian history.
Mitri Raheb, in his article, plays with the idea of DNA matching: .....
So here we have Palestinians around for 3000 years in Israel and no Jew until the last century
......
Jokes aside, I have several serious questions to ask you:
1. The name of your conference “Christ at the Checkpoint” means that Jesus was a Palestinian, for whom, you claim, it would be difficult (but not impossible) today to come and see his birthplace Bethlehem because of an Israeli Checkpoint.
But this problem is solved very easily: since he was, for all that, a Jew, it would be really impossible for him to come to and live in Bethlehem (his birthplace) anyway, since Jews are not allowed to live there. They would be murdered on the spot. .....
....if Jews didn’t live here, and the history of this land is Palestinian history only, then Temple was Palestinian, the high priest, who may have wanted to crucify Jesus, was, naturally, a Palestinian, and people in the yard of Pontius Pilate'’s palace, whom you believe cried “Crucify him, crucify him!”, were really Palestinians.
As I wrote before, no Jews around!
.....
Ed. Note: The writer wrote Arutz Sheva that she sent her questions to the conference organizers but has received no response.
(Excerpt) Read more at israelnationalnews.com ...
My sin put him on the cross.
The author makes a good point but its moot.
Didn’t the Hamas people admit that Palestinians were really Egyptians and Syrians?
The Romans killed Yashua. A Roman judge (Pontius Pilate) turned Him over to the Roman soldiers who crucified Him.
Only in Arabic, so it doesn’t count.
Pilate and those involved were a means to an already predicted end.
What was it Jesus said to Pilate? - "...Threfore, he who delivered me over to you has the greater sin." Jn 19:11
At whose request???
You have to ask? Pilate asked who do you want me to free? The Jews didn’t request that Pilate execute Yashua. He gave the Jews a choice. If Pilate, by turning Yashua to be crucified was fulfilling prophecy. Any literate Christian would know that and not condemn Jews for “killing Christ”.
Bingo! Prophecy was being fulfilled. And who actually turned Yashua over to be crucified? Pilate. We Jews have been vilified down through the ages because “we killed Christ” not that “we Jews helped to fulfill prophecy”
Palestinians of course
And who did they choose to condemn to death by crucifixion?
You simply don’t get it do you? The Jews were fulfilling prophecy. Okay??? But yet we were and have been condemned by Christians since then. Christianity is a Jewish sect believe it or not. It’s not a separate religion. Without Christ you wouldn’t have anything. And Yashua is what? Jewish, so what does that make you?
There were no so called Palestinians at that time ...
There were no so called Palestinians at that time ...
According to President Obama’s minister Jeremiah Wright, it was white Europeans known as “Eyetalians” what killed Jesus.
Precisely the point of the article.
Now you admit to it after 2,000 years? Sheesh! Get a rope, folks!
That must have been some sin.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.