Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEC Charges optionsXpress and Five Individuals Involved in Abusive Naked Short Selling Scheme
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ^ | April 16, 2012 | SEC staff

Posted on 04/16/2012 8:48:24 PM PDT by Pelham

Washington, D.C., April 16, 2012 – The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged an online brokerage and clearing agency specializing in options and futures as well as four officials at the firm and a customer involved in an abusive naked short selling scheme.

The SEC’s Division of Enforcement alleges that Chicago-based optionsXpress failed to satisfy its close-out obligations under Regulation SHO by repeatedly engaging in a series of sham “reset” transactions designed to give the illusion that the firm had purchased securities of like kind and quantity. The firm and customer Jonathan I. Feldman engaged in these sham reset transactions in a number of securities, resulting in continuous failures to deliver. Regulation SHO requires the delivery of equity securities to a registered clearing agency when delivery is due, generally three days after the trade date (T+3). If no delivery is made by that time, the firm must purchase or borrow the securities to close out the failure-to-deliver position by no later than the beginning of regular trading hours on the next day (T+4).

The former chief financial officer at optionsXpress – Thomas E. Stern of Chicago – was named in the SEC’s administrative proceeding along with optionsXpress and Feldman. Three other optionsXpress officials – head of trading and customer service Peter J. Bottini and compliance officers Phillip J. Hoeh and Kevin E. Strine – were named in a separate administrative proceeding and settled the charges against them for their roles in the scheme.

Additional Materials SEC Order Against optionsXpress, Stern, and Feldman SEC Order Against Bottini, Hoeh, and Strine "Feldman and optionsXpress used sham reset transactions to avoid, sometimes for months, compliance with Reg. SHO's stock delivery requirements," said Robert Khuzami, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "In effect, they 'kited' shares of stock, thus depriving buyers of the benefit of their bargain - prompt delivery of their shares."

Daniel M. Hawke, Chief of the Division of Enforcement’s Market Abuse Unit, added, “Reg. SHO compliance continues to be a high enforcement priority. Broker-dealers, their employees, and their customers must ensure that they comply with the close-out requirements of the short sale rules and regulations.”

According to the SEC’s order, the misconduct occurred from at least October 2008 to March 2010. In September 2011, optionsXpress became a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Charles Schwab Corporation.

The SEC’s Enforcement Division alleges that the sham reset transactions impacted the market for the issuers. For example, from Jan. 1, 2010 to Jan. 31, 2010, optionsXpress customers including Feldman accounted for an average of 47.9 percent of the daily trading volume in one of the securities. In 2009 alone, the optionsXpress customer accounts engaging in the activity purchased approximately $5.7 billion worth of securities and sold short approximately $4 billion of options. In 2009, Feldman himself purchased at least $2.9 billion of securities and sold short at least $1.7 billion of options through his account at optionsXpress.

According to the SEC’s order, by engaging in the alleged misconduct, optionsXpress violated Rules 204 and 204T of Regulation SHO; Feldman willfully violated Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rules 10b-5 and 10b-21 thereunder; optionsXpress and Stern caused and willfully aided and abetted Feldman’s violations of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rules 10b-5 and 10b-21 thereunder; and Stern caused and willfully aided and abetted optionsXpress’s violations of Rules 204 and 204T.

In the separate settled administrative proceeding, Bottini, Hoeh, and Strine consented to a cease-and-desist order finding that they caused optionsXpress’s violations of Rules 204 and 204T of Regulation SHO and ordering them to cease-and-desist from committing or causing violations of Rule 204. They neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings.

The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Deborah Tarasevich, Jill Henderson, and Paul Kim. Market Surveillance Specialist Brian Shute, Market Abuse Unit Trading Specialist Ainsley Fuhr, and Financial Economist Michael P. Barnes provided assistance with the investigation. The litigation will be led by Frederick Block.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nakedshorting; sec

1 posted on 04/16/2012 8:48:40 PM PDT by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Just be glad Helen Thomas wasn’t the reporter on this story.

Thanks Pelham.


2 posted on 04/16/2012 8:58:13 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Wow, I’ve traded with these guys for years. Charles Schwab just bought them out recently.


3 posted on 04/16/2012 8:58:31 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Election 2012 - America stands or falls. No more excuses. Get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Yeah the SEC gets right on those fraud cases, huh — October 2008.


4 posted on 04/16/2012 9:09:25 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Ah, but we can always have a picture of Helen Thomas to grace the thread.

Although the thought of Helen combined with naked shorting, or naked anything, staggers the mind.


5 posted on 04/16/2012 9:09:29 PM PDT by Pelham (Marco Rubio, la raza trojan horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

“Chicago-based optionsXpress “

And...there....we....go.


6 posted on 04/16/2012 9:12:50 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
"...Five Individuals Involved in Abusive Naked Short Selling Scheme"

Sounds kinky...

7 posted on 04/16/2012 9:23:02 PM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

Ew! That’s what I was trying to avoid. :’)


8 posted on 04/16/2012 9:42:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Naked short selling is OK—but they were abusing it!


9 posted on 04/16/2012 11:55:44 PM PDT by Sicvee (Sicvee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Free Vulcan

my husband’s little remaining ira money is with them, and being taken care of by his former boss, who was some kind of expert, except he got out of Apple when it was really low.......total waste of money and time.....and now their under investigation.....


10 posted on 04/17/2012 12:46:19 AM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson