Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Navy Kicks off the Search for Its Next Fighter
Defense Tech ^ | 04/16/2012 | Staff

Posted on 04/17/2012 8:20:04 AM PDT by Josh Painter

Speaking of F/A-XX, the Navy’s planned 6th generation fighter that will replace the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, below you’ll find the Navy’s brand new Request for Information on the aircraft. By Brand new, I mean it just dropped on Friday.

Whatever jet is selected will hopefully replace the Super Hornets around 2030, said Rear Adm. Donald Gaddis this afternoon at the Navy League’s annual Sea, Air, Space conference in National Harbor, Md. Before the Navy can settle on the final capabilities such a plane will have, it needs to know what types of technology the defense industry can bring to the table for a brand new fighter that will be fielded in less than two decades, said Gaddis. The new jet must be able to survive in anti-access environment, have next-gen sensors and maybe even the ability to ‘buddy’ refuel other fighters and perform airborne early warning (AEW) duties, according to Gaddis.

Here’s what the actual RfI says the service wants in the new jet:

The intent of this research is to solicit Industry inputs on candidate solutions for CVN based aircraft to provide multi-role capability in an A2AD operational environment. Primary missions include, but are not limited to, air warfare (AW), strike warfare (STW), surface warfare (SUW), and close air support (CAS). Also consider the ability of your concept to provide other capabilities currently provided by strike fighter aircraft, such as organic air-to-air refueling (AAR), Tactical Reconnaissance, Surveillance and Target Acquisition (RSTA), and airborne electronic attack (AEA)...

(Excerpt) Read more at defensetech.org ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: fa18; faxx; fighter; usnavy
FAXX Navy
1 posted on 04/17/2012 8:20:16 AM PDT by Josh Painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

You mean it is not the F-35? I thought that was the answer to all the future needs... sarcasm off.


2 posted on 04/17/2012 8:35:16 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

OH BOY Let’s just SEE what the RETARDS in MODERN Naval TacAir will come up with NEXT! STUPID BASTARDS!


3 posted on 04/17/2012 8:36:19 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

I know drones have demonstrated the ability to aerial refuel — I wonder if they’ve made landings on carriers yet?


4 posted on 04/17/2012 8:47:42 AM PDT by zipper (espions sur les occupants)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
My suggestion:

Total airborne cost under $75, i.e. if I can afford it the US Navy probably can...

5 posted on 04/17/2012 8:48:18 AM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet

Gee I got an IDEA, how about the the E-2F, F-14D, The A-6F AND the KS-3 TANKER! DUMP THE BUG!


6 posted on 04/17/2012 8:59:33 AM PDT by US Navy Vet (Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
6th generation fighter

Reading and comprehending before posting is so passe.

7 posted on 04/17/2012 9:13:50 AM PDT by A.A. Cunningham (Barry Soetoro is a Kenyan communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

If you Google F35 Navy version you come up with lots of hits.

If this new fighter which is supposed to be the acme of all current research—but hasn’t hit the production line for the fleet yet—is already contracted for, why is the Navy pushing for a new fighter?

Look at the normal lifespan of our current air superiority fighters (and their is no enemy fighter that can compete with them now) and you begin to wonder if anyone told the Navy chiefs that our country is going to sink under a mountain of debt.


8 posted on 04/17/2012 9:18:20 AM PDT by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter
Shame the YF-23 is being wasted.

It would be a great F-14 replacement, F/A-18 replacement and give the Navy an equal to the F-22 or better.

Once upon a time, the YF-17 lost to the YF-16, but was too good to waste.

It was 'navalized' for carrier use and turned into the F/A-18.

The YF-23 lost to the YF-22 and is waiting for the same transformation.

9 posted on 04/17/2012 9:19:21 AM PDT by GBA (America has been infected. Be the cure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

We’ll be lucky if we HAVE a Navy in 2030, and even luckier if we are deploying any CVNs.


10 posted on 04/17/2012 9:25:16 AM PDT by Jim Noble ("The Germans: At your feet, or at your throat" - Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter; Jeff Head
They don't even have a 5th generation fighter yet, and they're already looking for a the 6th???

Ridiculous.

11 posted on 04/17/2012 9:28:28 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

When Obama is re-elected we will be buying our Jets from China..
Wonder if Zero has given the new Aegis upgrades to them YET?...


12 posted on 04/17/2012 9:42:23 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zipper

I’ve seen 1970s, maybe early 1980s footage of a drone on a carrier. They put up a net across the deck to snag it, rather than a touch down.


13 posted on 04/17/2012 9:52:30 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

Since the delivery date of 2030 is about the same for both airplanes isn’t the generation about the same?


14 posted on 04/17/2012 10:14:30 AM PDT by Sequoyah101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: US Navy Vet
Gee I got an IDEA, how about the the E-2F, F-14D, The A-6F AND the KS-3 TANKER!

The ST-21 and AST-21 should have replaced the F-14D and A-6F by now. KA-6Fs can tank.

15 posted on 04/17/2012 10:23:32 AM PDT by Oztrich Boy (This world is a comedy to those that think, a tragedy to those that feel - Horace Walpole)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GBA; Timber Rattler
I agree. The YF-23, revisited anbd upgraded to cutrrent tech would be an axcellent choice.

I hope Northrup/Gruman/McDonnel Douglas reintroduce it. That was, IMHO, one fine aircraft and still would be.

The F-22 and F-35 are both considered fifth generation fighters. The new Sukhoi PAK FA T-50 is also considered 5th gen...but I do not know if the Russians/Indians can afford to build them.

So, a 2030 aircraft is apt to be rightfully named a 6th gemn aircraft. I believe if they bring the YF-23 Black Widow II out, dust it off, and do a major upgrade to the latest and greatest sensors, electronics, stealth, weapons, etc. that they could meet the specs.

I was personally rooting for her against the F-22 back during the competition.

We'll see. Boy but she is pretty.




16 posted on 04/17/2012 10:59:11 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free, never has been, never will be (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I was personally rooting for her against the F-22 back during the competition.

Yeah, me too.

Right now, the F-35 farce is starting to look more and more like Robert McNamara's TFX/F-111 debacle, so much so that our allies are getting nervous about delivery and starting to bail.

17 posted on 04/17/2012 11:11:28 AM PDT by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson