Skip to comments.
US: Strike on N. Korea Possible if Nuclear Test Held
KBS World ^
| April 17, 2012
| Not Listed
Posted on 04/18/2012 3:23:02 AM PDT by No One Special
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
To: No One Special
41
posted on
04/18/2012 11:28:06 AM PDT
by
familyop
(We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of rotten politics smelled around the planet.)
To: No One Special
Get real. Just cut off the food and let them starve. If we strike North Korea then Seoul gets pummeled in retaliation. There is no way to get all their artillery and rocket positions before they have savaged the city.
Obama is an armature. He makes threats he can't carry out, and that means nobody takes him seriously. Threaten to cut off food aid, that is a real threat. Threaten to blockade their coast, that is a real threat. Threaten anything short of all out invasion to push them back out of range of Seoul and they know it is a bluff. And we don't have the forces in theater to actually invade the North so even that would be a bluff without a major buildup first.
42
posted on
04/18/2012 11:44:42 AM PDT
by
GonzoGOP
(There are millions of paranoid people in the world and they are all out to get me.)
To: No One Special
Locklear is speaking out of turn and has NO support for this position in the WH or the Congress.
43
posted on
04/18/2012 11:45:48 AM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: Sacajaweau
They must be getting really old. Would they really be able to fight the norks?
44
posted on
04/18/2012 11:54:02 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Cheney/Rumsfeld 2012)
To: USAF80
No worse enemies than the Japs. Pretty good friends, but if you want to get their attention you have to drop the big one. Twice.
45
posted on
04/18/2012 11:59:18 AM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Cheney/Rumsfeld 2012)
To: rpkgolf
WHY DO THAT WHEN HES GOT THE BEAST?
46
posted on
04/18/2012 12:10:11 PM PDT
by
ichabod1
(Cheney/Rumsfeld 2012)
To: No One Special
tough talk in an election year
nothing but politics
plus, watch for those Friday night newsdumps when Obama decides to send NK the food anyway
47
posted on
04/18/2012 12:24:05 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Tallguy
If the President were a Republican, this would be the instant outrageous top news story of the day. The President is a warmonger!!
but its a D...
*crickets*
48
posted on
04/18/2012 12:27:55 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
To: Nathaniel
You and your Dad are exactly right about how we shoulda turned MacArthur loose(r). But my 3.5 inch bazooka didn’t have any real trouble with T-34 sheet iron-—you just had to be closer than he could shoot——that’s the butt-pinching part.
49
posted on
04/18/2012 12:42:53 PM PDT
by
cherokee1
(skip the names---just kick the buttz)
To: GonzoGOP
Get real. Just cut off the food and let them starve.I remember when we flew rice into NK. They would reject the bags with any Korean or Japanese markings. We would have to re-bag the rice in bags with Indian markings. I'm certain that the NK poeple have no idea that their two southern neighbors were feeding them.
50
posted on
04/18/2012 1:06:30 PM PDT
by
USAF80
To: AtlasStalled
This would not be a roll over like Iraq. The NKs would put up a better fight plus you can't tell a South Korean from a North Korean. There will be lots of infiltrators that can run amok in the south.
51
posted on
04/18/2012 1:11:40 PM PDT
by
USAF80
To: No One Special
Not going to happen. This isn’t Libya here... North Korea has far more powerful friends in the region than Gadhafy did in North Africa.
Plus, the thought of losing much of their capital city is cause for concern on the part of South Korea.
It’s just bluster...nothing more.
52
posted on
04/18/2012 1:36:22 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(A single drop of American blood for muslims is one drop too many!)
To: No One Special
In other words, just wait until after Obama’s last election. Then you can have your 3rd test. Obama will be much more flexible after the election. Just ask Putin.
To: No One Special
it's POSSIBLE for any number of reasons, the question is... is it PROBABLE??? and that answer is no
54
posted on
04/18/2012 5:08:32 PM PDT
by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: servo1969
I honestly couldnt see this administration attacking NK even if it sank one of our aircraft carriers,That is the real issue, not NK's hypothetical retaliation. We could handle that. The problem is political, not military, and we have a political traitor on the White House.
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
It will take the form of a strongly worded letter, maybe two.
Those letters? “O” and “K”.
Thanks No One Special.
56
posted on
04/20/2012 7:57:28 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(FReepathon 2Q time -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: No One Special
WTF, just make an announcement that the action is considered a de-facto abrogation of the Armistace Agreement and that the United States and the United Nations (by extension) are back in active war mode against North Korea.
57
posted on
04/25/2012 9:20:09 PM PDT
by
AmericanInTokyo
(Study closely socialist Hugo Chavez' usage of 'popular masses' in the streets to thwart 1992 coup)
To: No One Special
58
posted on
04/26/2012 4:15:34 AM PDT
by
nuconvert
( Khomeini promised change too // Hail, Chairman O)
To: No One Special
Just send the NORKS some food, all they have is bark and leaves to eat.
Get them stuffed on Crispy Cremes and they will just die from excess sugar.
59
posted on
04/26/2012 4:27:47 AM PDT
by
Eye of Unk
(Liberals need not reply.)
To: cherokee1
Thanks, cherokee - My Dad is a hero to me - a real combat vet, like yourself. I’ve only READ of Task Force Smith and other Korean combat - Dad (and you) live it. I was in the 2nd ID on the DMZ in’92-’93. Nothing compared to the war. My own combat experience was on Grenada in 1983 - a VERY brief one - I’m proud of it, but it was very, very brief in comparison.
60
posted on
05/02/2012 4:42:45 PM PDT
by
Nathaniel
(- A Man Without A Cross -)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson