In many ways the impending Zimmerman trial is bigger than most or all of the other 10 posted in this article.
But anyway, what exactly is the writer’s point, that there’s no such thing as a “trial of the century”?
I think that’s a rather difficult point to make. If you judge such things by publicity and/or impact on legal precedent and/or political ramifications, each century MUST have its list of “big trials”... mustn’t it?
And this particular century is only 11 years old, making it fairly easy to include the Zimmerman trial on a list of “trial of the century” candidates for the 21st century.
But maybe I’m missing the author’s point. Can someone help me out?
Where are the skittles and Iced tea? Or was that just part of the story?
I wonder if this recent case of the THREE DAY OLD BABY, snatched (allegedly, of course) by two blacks, and the mother shot SEVEN times trying to rescue her baby, will be reported by the media as exhaustively as the Trayvon case has been. - OR, if Jesse and Al will travel to Texas to rabble rouse about this case.