Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah; woodbutcher1963; Gilbo_3; stephenjohnbanker; LibsRJerks; ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; ...
RE :”We continue to suffer from years of neglect where local politicians imagined that if they didn't build roads that would stop development in its track....BTW, that doesn't work at all. You end up with massive development and 2 lane pea gravel and tar roads

You need to learn how to figure out their motives.

The Dem in charge of my county during the peak development years that he supported fully said the same thing, that building roads just encourages more development, all while he supported tens of thousands of new houses being built here..

That argument makes no sense, it's like saying the cart pulls the horse.

The reason why these libs encourage massive development without the required road work is to build voters support for public transportation at taxpayer expense, the LAST THING I WANT HERE.

35 posted on 04/20/2012 7:23:13 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: sickoflibs
There are tens of thousands of miles of open road in this country where there's virtually no development.

The motive behind "development" is not the same as that behind roads.

37 posted on 04/20/2012 7:27:32 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson