BB, the post that I replied to was you ragging on another freeper for supporting Newt or Palin, so obviously you are in the tub for the loser masquerading as a Republican.
Most of the GOP base wants “anybody but Romney” to be our candidate, and will willingly support “anybody but Romney.” Its the Romney bunch that are the problem, because they are Luciferians that will not support a non-Luciferian candidate. (the ‘Bush’ cadre)
Is your solution really to jump on board with the Luciferian for the sake of party unity?
.
I don't rag on people, editor-surveyor!!! As a matter of principle!
I do not know to what posts you are referring. Please help me out here?
The only things I remember saying in recent times about Newt or Sarah was something along the following lines:
I "opined" that Sarah Palin — who I deeply admire and totally respect — would probably very much dislike living in the "fishbowl" of the Oval Office, on grounds of natural temperament, and the belief that she can accomplish MORE for the conservative cause outside of government than in it. That is simply my "intuition" talking.... It may be wrong or right.
As for Newt: I have tremendous respect and gratitude for the man who sheperded the Contract with America through Congress during the '90s; and who bargained Clinton into finally accepting welfare reform, which the latter was vehemently opposed to and determined to resist. Newt is a brilliant intellect, and has been a highly effective political operator in the past.
The problem that I see with Gingrich (whether it's there in your eyes or not) is that somewhere along the line, some bolt came loose. He wants to be acknowledged as the "smartest guy in the room" everywhere he goes. Indeed, he thinks he is. Evaluating him on grounds of sheer narcissism (these days), it seems to me he's just as bad as Obama. I have reason to suspect that he has become mentally unbalanced in consequence.
You wrote:
Is your solution really to jump on board with the Luciferian for the sake of party unity?I am not preeminently interested in "party unity." What I'm interested in is party success — in defeating a criminal mobster and removing him from the White House. I am of course aware that it will take a unified party to do that.
But that is not what we have.
Plus I am quite a bit put off by your association of me with Lucifer. Just because I don't agree with you, does this make me the Devil's spawn???
Oh, pul-eeeeezze.... How totally gratuitous, mindless....
You say "Most of the GOP base wants 'anybody but Romney' to be our candidate, and will willingly support 'anybody but Romney'.”
Well, I don't know about the "most of the GOP base," but I certainly know that is the sentiment of a great many of my respected friends around here.
But if what you say is true, dear editor-surveyor, then the GOP WILL go down in defeat, next November.
And then, ask yourself: What happens next? Do you want Obama to pick the next Supreme Court justice, for instance?
In my estimation, there is very little objective chance of there being a viable "anybody but Romney" candidate at this late stage. Romney's fundraising skills and (even more important) his breathtaking organizational skills put any serious challenge to him from within the party in the category of "not likely to happen." But we'll see about that....
Dear editor-surveyor: I am a political realist, not an ideologist.
The Democrat party knows "how to WIN."
The Republicans know "how to brawl" — which means they do not WIN. Many would rather be "right" than to "win."
JMHO FWIW
Editor, I have exchanged at length with Betty, and while we disagree, I do believe that she is not a Romney supporter. I am convinced that she believes that the lesser of 2 evils is the better course of action. I’m not going to get into an extended discussion of the flaws evident in that plan after these many decades of doing that, but I will say that it is a different motive than that of a Romney-bot.
BB has a consistent presence on the religion threads for years as a pro-God, pro-life, pro-gun, pro-small government conservative. That is why I’m convinced she is not a supporter of Mitt Romney. That and her word, of course.
I will attempt over these next few months to convince her that the CP party and its candidate, Virgil Goode, would be a plan for the future to take us out of this never-ending cycle of having to choose the lesser of 2 evils by starting NOW to build a solid conservative party. (A new party begun no is like oil. Drill NOW for the future oil needs the nation will have. Delaying drilling only delays the day of available oil and of oil independence.)
In short, Betty, vote for Goode and not for evil.
Faith, my Sister.