Right now Obama has a 30 - 40% chance of reelection, but if the minority of the political right who actually believes this crap screams about the Birther stuff loudly enough, the odds will go up past 50%. T%hat’s why Obama’s political and media flacks (e.g., MSNBC) are always baiting the easily manipulated to keep up the Birther talk.
“who actually believes this crap screams about the Birther stuff”
So you believe the birth certificate is real?
So you believe the selective service record is real?
Are you calling Sheriff Joe a liar?
You know, even though I do not support Obama’s removal from office by a court, the fact of the matter is that he is not who he says he is and his documents are false.
I believe it is the duty of the voters to vote this fraud out, and not the duty of any court, but this man redifines the word fraud.
Intrade has obama at 60%
I don’t mean this post as a personal attack on you, but I am curious...could you explain to me how a forged birth certificate is “crap”? I might misunderstand you, because there are some aspects of this that are crap, like clinging to the belief that somehow this will take down Obama and force him from office.
In that case, I would agree it is crap.
But that is not what this is about. This is about putting a process in place for this election and future elections to ensure that anyone running for higher office is who they say they are, and that they meet the Constitutional requirements for citizenship.
Do you agree or disagree that is a worthy goal?
Perhaps I should narrow it down further with two questions:
1.) Do you think the Birth Certificate is forged? (If you don’t, it would be obvious that you view that subject as “crap”, I expect)
2.) If you DO think it is forged (or have no opinion on the authenticity) then do you think it is important, yes or no?
If your answer to question #2 is “No”, then why don’t you think it important?
The insidious, damaging and corrosive aspect of this is the action of a person in the most important office in this country who would submit a fraudulent, forged document without fear of repercussion, the President of The United States.
If you or I lied under oath in a taped deposition, would we be eligible for prosecution? Do you agree or disagree that the damage done by the former President of the United States, lying under oath, has any bearing on the rule of law?
And if the ostensible head of of the Justice Department was known to submit fraudulent documents such as a birth certificate that had been cobbled together, does that weaken the case for anyone else trying to prosecute someone for identity theft with forged documents?
I take issue with your calling this subject “this crap”. One of the reasons the Left is running roughshod over many aspects of life is because they have bent and broken the rules and the law in so many ways large and small without being challenged, that their version of what is right and lawful in so many aspects is what is being accepted.
Answer this common sense question.
Why has Obama spent millions of dollars in court concealing his "documentation"?
What is Obama trying to hide?
The "easily manipulated" description more aptly applies to those who don't question Obama's bizarre actions in regard to this issue.
We need to use everything from his questionable past; Rev. Wright, Dog Eating, Where was he born, how did he pay for school, what did he mean by more flexibility after the election, etc. to bring down this empty suited Goliath.
Actually it’s the exact opposite. If “birther stuff” helped 0bastard why is the MSM Propaganda Arm of the Left dead silent about it? They’d be covering Arpaio daily if “birther stuff” helped their guy win.
Actually even moderates and dems are starting to wonder who the heck the guy in the White House really is.
Where are you getting these statistics from - out of your a$$, where your head seems to be stuck?