[FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs]

Alan Dershowitz 'hits it out the park' once again with this objective, clear and concise analysis of this case and the application of the law without prejudice.

[saganite]

Linky?

[b4its2late]

The ‘without prejudice’ is a relatively recent phenomenon in Dershowitz’s case.

[hope]

It was a great interview. He pretty much said she should be in jail.

[1riot1ranger]

It’s time to throw out the ann coulter rule and have a Megyn Kelly rule! Megyn posts must include a pic!

[DBrow]

LA Riots all over again.

[A.A. Cunningham]

So Dershowitz repeated what he has already said.

[CaptainAmiigaf]

I must humbly apologize to Alan Dershowitz for 76.4% of the nasty thoughts I have had about him for many, many years. Admittedly the anger was over POLITICAL statements.
However, Mr. Dershowitz has demonstrated as very few have recently, the basic adherence to the LAW, as written and intended. He has shown here what is meant by the famous phrase “A nation of LAWS.”

[AU72]

I wish Dershowitz was Zimmerman’s attorney. This case would be a walk-in-the-park for somebody who got Von Bulow off.

[Nifster]

Yup. Alan is dead on with this one

[MtBaldy]

It’s disappointing that Kelly and Dershowitz are STILL trying to portray Zimmerman as the initial aggressor, he wasn’t. Zimmerman was entirely within his rights as a citizen, forget he’s Neighborhood Watch, to follow Martin. He kept his distance, said nothing to Martin, and did not accost him. Martin was the only aggressor and threatened Zimmerman’s life while he was apparently trying to take it. The real travesty and miscarriage of justice here was jailing and charging Zimmerman. Kelly needs to get her facts straight.

[Jaded]

Wonder if he will be helping out Team Z?