Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rick Perry Endorses Mitt Romney
myfoxla.com ^ | April 25 2012

Posted on 04/25/2012 6:01:44 PM PDT by NoLibZone

Texas Gov. Rick Perry originally endorsed Newt Gingrich as the top candidate after dropping out of the Republican presidential race.

But with Gingrich set to quit the campaign trail, Perry on Wednesday evening gave his support to the probable nominee, Mitt Romney.

"Mitt Romney has earned the Republican presidential nomination through hard work, a strong organization, and [a] disciplined message of restoring America after nearly four years of failed job-killing policies from President [Barack] Obama and his administration," Perry said in a statement provided to FOX News Channel.

"So today I join the many conservative Republicans across the nation in endorsing Mitt Romney for president and pledge to him, my constituents and the Republican Party that I will continue to work hard to help defeat President Obama.

(Excerpt) Read more at myfoxla.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 2012endorsements; 2102; endorsements; furp; goawayperry; larazarick; mitt; mittromney; oops; perry; perry2012; perry4illegals; rickperry; tx2012
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-367 next last
To: vox_freedom
And, pray tell, what kind of a future does this party have that believes in nothing and everything? Or does everyone live just for "the party" whatever it is?

The goal of political party in our 2 party system is to win. That is the cold, hard truth. It will always be more about winning than advancing any particular cause. There will ALWAYS be an establishment steering the party, and it's goal will ALWAYS be to win at almost all costs. No matter which way the culture moves - left or right, political party's will tend to follow. They will tend to hug the center to get 50% + 1 voters and win. Far more things influence society than just politicians. Unfortunately, some of the biggest influences on our culture right now are coming from the left - entertainment, education, etc.

Our mission within the political party that at least pretends to be conservative, the GOP, is push it to the right and try to nominate the most conservative candidate that can actually win - hopefully one with an actual vision that includes moving the country politically in the right direction. Unfortunately, there are many people under the umbrella of the same party that do not want to push the party to the right. We have to compete with them. Unified in the primaries, conservatives do have an advantage over "moderates" and should win much/most of the time. Unfortunately, we are rarely unified - and weren't yet again this year.

101 posted on 04/25/2012 8:21:31 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

Silly behavior is the question you asked in the context it was asked. And you asked it of someone else.


102 posted on 04/25/2012 8:21:49 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom
Sorry, but reality is what it is; our choice is between Romney and Obama. You and I may not like it, but this is reality. Like Rush says: “I live in Realville.”

So let me ask you; are you going to sit the presidential election out, or write someone in? While these two options might make you feel better, they will accomplish nothing.

103 posted on 04/25/2012 8:23:20 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

“They did not choose a benevolent monarchy”

According to Jefferson and Madison, Adams and Hamilton were all for a benevolent monarchy. Some anti-Federalists, pre-ratification, argued the office of President was an elected monarch.


104 posted on 04/25/2012 8:23:48 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Jess Kitting

It means: Waah Waah, my guy isnt winning so there must be some conspiracy, because otherwise I would have to accept that my view is not that popular and I am not the base.


105 posted on 04/25/2012 8:25:00 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
So-called "winning" by compromising on every single issue of importance to us? Are you serious? Anti pro-life, and support for homosexual marriage, nationalized health care, willing to compromise on the 2nd Amendment, etc., etc., etc.

I absolutely refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils and will not. Primarily because with Romney as the head of the GOP ticket, we will likely end up with the evil of the two evils. I'd rather work for, vote for, and support those candidates that support my values, my beliefs, and our freedoms who are running for US Congress and US Senate, and state offices.

106 posted on 04/25/2012 8:29:24 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam

Reminds me of hockey fans, I’m one by the way, who cannot understand why sports call in shows rarely talk about the sport. They do not understand that because they like hockey, nobody else does. It takes real self confidence to understand that your own likes and dislikes may not be the same as everybody else’s, and be cool about it.


107 posted on 04/25/2012 8:29:59 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

We are, indeed, sliding into socialism. and I’ve often thought that the only way now to halt it is CWII, or a second American Revolution, the violent kind, because there are no consequences for the corrupt on either side of the political fence. Until the traitors and the corrupt are held responsible we will get no meaningful change in our government. Romney is the last one standing and I know, too, that his record is no good,but, again, he isn’t the muslim communist that Zero is


108 posted on 04/25/2012 8:32:56 PM PDT by Quickgun (Second Amendment. The only one you can put your hands on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Artcore
I will not vote for Romney. That's my Realville. Rush can yack up a storm and I could care less. Besides Rush has a conflict of interest in the outcome since he makes more $$$ by having guys like Clinton and Obama in power.

Photobucket

109 posted on 04/25/2012 8:33:15 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: gusty; Longbow1969
The Founders did NOT want a two party system.

THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE - PDF

In order to appreciate the reasons for the Electoral College, it is essential to understand its historical context and the problem that the Founding Fathers were trying to solve. They faced the difficult question of how to elect a president in a nation that:

*was composed of thirteen large and small States jealous of their own rights and powers and suspicious of any central national government

*contained only 4,000,000 people spread up and down a thousand miles of Atlantic seaboard barely connected by transportation or communication (so that national campaigns were impractical even if they had been thought desirable)

*believed, under the influence of such British political thinkers as Henry St John Bolingbroke, that political parties were mischievous if not downright evil, and

*felt that gentlemen should not campaign for public office (The saying was "The office should seek the man, the man should not seek the office.").

How, then, to choose a president without political parties, without national campaigns, and without upsetting the carefully designed balance between the presidency and the Congress on one hand and between the States and the federal government on the other?

110 posted on 04/25/2012 8:34:40 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: gusty
They chose a Republic with 3 equal branches. That was the result.

They did not choose what they had just fought to defeat. And at a very dear cost.

Romney vs Obama = socialist vs socialist.

111 posted on 04/25/2012 8:37:59 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

Well there ya go.


112 posted on 04/25/2012 8:38:34 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Raider Sam
because otherwise I would have to accept that my view is not that popular and I am not the base.

The base? You think there's a groundswell for Romney?

I voted yesterday. At 5 pm I was voter 46. Last night there were other posters telling the same tale. Voter turnout was very low. There is no enthusiasm.

113 posted on 04/25/2012 8:40:48 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

We have a second party. It’s called the Democrats and I invite you to come to Chicago, Cook County, IL and see what they’ve done. Of course you’re from California and it’s a paradise.

If we have a third party it should be a green party that gets on every Congressional ballot along with the Presidential ballot. That way we can hold majorities for decades which is what we need to get America back.


114 posted on 04/25/2012 8:42:45 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Quickgun
he isn’t the muslim communist that Zero is

Their records are the same. The rest is just window dressing.

We needed another revolution long before this. The problem is that government schools have so dumbed down people that they can't reason and don't see what's happening.

115 posted on 04/25/2012 8:43:17 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom
I will take them one at a time.

Pro-Life - Romney will have no effect one way or the other, just like Reagan, and both Bushes. Like the other three before, he will talk a good game, but no bill on the issue will ever bear his signature. The true hero of the Pro-life movement was not any activists or politician, but the sonogram. The sonogram is what has changed a majority pro-choice nation to pro-life.

Gay marriage - we are doomed there. The good news is it will be widespread when most of us are dead. Talk to the under-30 crowd, its popular. The indoctrination worked, they are just waiting for us older folk to take our dirt naps. No one was going to stop this one, and I hate it, but its reality.

Nationalized health care- I take him at his word, he will repeal it. But we got to help by winning the Senate also.

2nd Amendment - We won this one on a Federal level. game over, pour the champagne. Obama is scared s***less on this one. He even signed a bill to let people carry heaters in national parks and on trains. The battleground is in the few anti-gun states. Including mine, dammit. If Obama will not touch this with a ten foot pole, then Romney's pole will be 30 feet long. Nothing to worry about.

116 posted on 04/25/2012 8:45:10 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw
Would Ron Paul be better than Romney?

He is different than Obama, Romney isn't.

117 posted on 04/25/2012 8:45:33 PM PDT by carenot (We'd rather hold on to the myth than fight for the reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom
So-called "winning" by compromising on every single issue of importance to us?

Up to you, but the very fact that we are constituency within a political party means we don't and won't have to compromise on EVERY issue of importance. Willard is not a conservative and a poor nominee in my opinion, but people are exaggerating to the extreme when they claim he'd govern like Obama. He simply can't. Romney couldn't be the same liberal as President as he was in Massachusetts even if he wanted to be. He answers to a different constituency now - nationally, a much more conservative constituency.

I absolutely refuse to vote for the lesser of two evils and will not. Primarily because with Romney as the head of the GOP ticket, we will likely end up with the evil of the two evils.

I don't really care what you do. You may feel it necessary to sit out this cycle, just like some felt the same about McCain. In the end it makes very little difference. In a 2 party system the vast majority of the voters are going turn out for one of the 2 party's. If our nominee were an actual conservative, you'd have some of the mushy moderate types insisting they will sit out or vote 3rd party. We get this every election cycle and it doesn't amount to a hill of beans. You can stamp your feet, howl at the moon, send angry letters the RNC, it really won't matter. If conservatives stay active and UNIFIED, we can make a difference and perhaps nominate a good candidate next time around. If we are divided, even the proportionally higher conservative turnout in primaries is diluted between multiple candidates which allows the establishment's choice a nice clean path to the nomination. I mean, this just happened 2 election cycles in a row. It should be obvious to all conservatives that it is really important to UNIFY and find a consensus conservative candidate in the primaries early on - but I doubt we will succeed again in 2016 or 2020.

Also screaming and wailing about the system doesn't really help. If you angrily announce to the GOP that you won't vote for their nominee, then you become essentially useless to them and they simply pay less attention to you than before. They know most will come crawling back anyway, because in our system there simply isn't anywhere else to go if you really want to at least make some difference.

118 posted on 04/25/2012 8:49:21 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: carenot
Ron Paul is an isolationist, antisemitic nut job. This warped freak thinks we were partly responsible for 9/11. What a sick, twisted bas*ard!
119 posted on 04/25/2012 8:50:56 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: 1010RD
We have a second party. It’s called the Democrats and I invite you to come to Chicago, Cook County, IL and see what they’ve done

I'm in So. CA and you're telling me what they've done to Illinois?

Come on.

120 posted on 04/25/2012 8:52:48 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
You do realize that Jefferson and Madison created the original Republican Party (now the Democrats), and Adams and Hamilton were founders of the Federalist Party (died in 1816). Despite their intentions they wasted no time in creating political parties. The same people within a five year period created the Constitution and political parties. It wasn't different people, but the same people.
121 posted on 04/25/2012 8:53:09 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom
Idiot alert! Idiot alert!

Dumba$$, I was a Perrywinkle.

122 posted on 04/25/2012 8:54:01 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I don’t know what the heck you’re talking about, but Rick Perry was the best candidate we had.

More people should have supported him.

I’m glad he endorsed Romney though... that should make Texas a lock for Romney although he would have gotten it anyway.


123 posted on 04/25/2012 8:55:28 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

You retain your title as an obnoxious troll who helped to drive our best candidate out and now you’re whining about who’s left.


124 posted on 04/25/2012 8:57:21 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OSHA

Obama thanks you for your support.

______________________________

....and all the while he’s chuckling.


125 posted on 04/25/2012 8:58:15 PM PDT by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified Decartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
The Founders did NOT want a two party system.

I'm not going to try to argue intent, others can no doubt do that better than me. The result, whether they wanted it or not, IS a 2 party system and has been almost right from the beginning. We've had 1 political party collapse (the Whigs) and be entirely replaced by Republicans who immediately became the second leg of the two party system. And it didn't happen at the Presidential level first, and no Libertarian Party, Constitution Party, or any other newfangled Party people dream up this time around is going to be even remotely competitive or make a single iota of difference.

So long as there is no opportunity for coalition government with multiple party's, there will be a 2 party system with both aiming for 50%+1 of the vote for the win.

126 posted on 04/25/2012 9:00:02 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: CatherineofAragon

I don’t think he HATED doing it. Obviously he wished for another outcome but he cares about America unlike some of the people who come on every thread to brag about voting for Obama.


127 posted on 04/25/2012 9:00:04 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA; hirn_man

Newt’s endorsement will cause an earthquake ‘round these parts.

When Sarah endorses it will be one of those pole-shifting, Mayan end-of-the-world dealios.


128 posted on 04/25/2012 9:02:03 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

I don’t care what you “were” Perrywinkle or otherwise.
I know what you are and that’s a jerk.


129 posted on 04/25/2012 9:03:30 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: gusty

So? They also knew that political parties would tear the country apart and tried to avoid it. Their first design lasted for 4 elections. Yup. They had to change it. But that doesn’t make what they knew less true and that is that parties are divisive and become factions that control. The losers are the people.


130 posted on 04/25/2012 9:04:27 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: altura
You retain your title as an obnoxious troll who helped to drive our best candidate out

_______________________________________________________

Our?

Who's that?

131 posted on 04/25/2012 9:04:43 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

We’ll have to compare damages. You might have as much corruption and misery, but you lose points for every day of nice weather.


132 posted on 04/25/2012 9:06:09 PM PDT by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom

The GOP is dead.

They consistently work with Dems/MSM against Conservative candidates and our issues, any Conservative who continues to support them at this late date, has simply refused to face it.

The GOP campaigns AGAINST Conservatives in elections and even more importantly, trashes Conservative legislation to the American people we are trying to reach.

They marginalize us, and undermine us in the press.

They are embarrassed by Conservatives, and in many cases hate us.

Romney and the RNC will destroy Conservatives in the House and Senate.


133 posted on 04/25/2012 9:06:28 PM PDT by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969
The result, whether they wanted it or not, IS a 2 party system

And they were right. Political parties are divisive and allow a small faction of people to have control. The people are the losers.

134 posted on 04/25/2012 9:06:59 PM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are here! What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

Agree with you.


135 posted on 04/25/2012 9:08:09 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Rick Perry.


136 posted on 04/25/2012 9:08:11 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw

I think they would be neck and neck at this point. And Rick Perry doesnt have the presentation or communication skills to win the appeal of anyone beyond a small core of supporters. I honestly cannot figure out what is up with the Republicans. Perhaps conservatives who actually want to and can improve American economy and social structure are getting turned off of politics altogether ?


137 posted on 04/25/2012 9:09:23 PM PDT by emax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman
Unfortunately, if Free Republic is any indication, many will 'sit' out or vote 3rd party.

I don't think the strongest anti-Romney voices here on FR are any real indication of the national electorate as a whole.

I think the fall election will be a referendum on Obama and I think most people have pretty clear preferences regarding him.

138 posted on 04/25/2012 9:11:26 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: vox_freedom
You started it, dumba$$.

Seems to me several people here think YOU are a jerk!

Again, your type of behavior is why people don't come to FR anymore. You are shallow and a waste of time!

139 posted on 04/25/2012 9:12:03 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: emax

You could not be more wrong about Rick Perry.

He has great communication skills. He makes a barn burner of a speech, he’s funny, likeable and is a true conservative.

If he decides to campaign for Mitt, he will be a huge asset.

I suspect you are like so many other people who knew almost nothing about Perry and believed the lies told about him.


140 posted on 04/25/2012 9:12:47 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: altura
You retain your title as an obnoxious troll who helped to drive our best candidate out

Rick Perry.

Oh....Tell Rick I loved him at La Raza...And if ya see him campaigning for Romney, say hey!

141 posted on 04/25/2012 9:14:07 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

thanks, and good night.


142 posted on 04/25/2012 9:14:35 PM PDT by vox_freedom (America is being tested as never before in its history. May God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

You’re right about that, lonestar. People get really tired of being abused by adolescent jerks who think they epitomize virtue by declaring that they will, in effect, vote for Obama.

I guess that’s okay if that’s what they want to do but it doesn’t give them the right to be obnoxious to people who want Obama out.


143 posted on 04/25/2012 9:15:04 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW

When did I say there was a groundswell for Romney? Are you that hyper-sensative?


144 posted on 04/25/2012 9:17:49 PM PDT by Raider Sam (They're on our left, right, front, and back. They aint gettin away this time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

Oh yeah, I remember you. Hope you like Romney.......


145 posted on 04/25/2012 9:18:43 PM PDT by potlatch (~~And the truth IS what counts, RIGHT ? ~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

Great post!


146 posted on 04/25/2012 9:19:44 PM PDT by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
Only the first two Presidential elections were free of party, and that was due to the stature of Washington. You are wrong about the next two. They were rip roaring political fights between the Federalists and the Republicans. The 4th one in 1800 is the gold standard for no holds barred politics. They changed after the fourth because of Aaron Burr going for the top job in the House even thou he was running as Jefferson's VP. They did not want to repeat this.
They fought hard against each other because they believed the other side was out to annihilate theirs. The Federalists believed that Jefferson would roll out the guillotines if he won. The Republicans truly believed Hamilton or Adams would crown himself king if he won.
A good example for today, is Alexander Hamilton in 1800. Thou Jefferson was his arch foe, he supported him over Burr because he believed Jefferson loved his country and Burr only loved himself. The next four years showed how correct Hamilton was in his assessment.
147 posted on 04/25/2012 9:19:59 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

I have no idea what you’re talking about.


148 posted on 04/25/2012 9:21:25 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: altura; vox_freedom
It's too silly to get upset about.

Funny thing is they are really just an irritation and then try to influence other people into agreeing with them! LOL!

149 posted on 04/25/2012 9:22:20 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: gusty
Gay marriage - we are doomed there. The good news is it will be widespread when most of us are dead. Talk to the under-30 crowd, its popular. The indoctrination worked, they are just waiting for us older folk to take our dirt naps. No one was going to stop this one, and I hate it, but its reality.

I disagree -- at least with regard to the guys. We do, however, have to do a better job of pointing out why we are against it rather than just looking like big meanies.

150 posted on 04/25/2012 9:24:11 PM PDT by Tribune7 (GAS WAS $1.85 per gallon on the day Obama was Inaugurated! - - freeper Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 351-367 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson