Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. ban sought on cell phone use while driving
Rooters ^ | 4/26/2012 | Rooters

Posted on 04/27/2012 6:29:13 AM PDT by Mike Darancette

SAN ANTONIO, April 26 (Reuters) - U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood called on Thursday for a federal law to ban talking on a cell phone or texting while driving any type of vehicle on any road in the country.

Tough federal legislation is the only way to deal with what he called a "national epidemic," he said at a distracted-driving summit in San Antonio, Texas, that drew doctors, advocates and government officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cellphone; federallaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: TDA2

Seems to be what they are up to.

Pass enough laws and regulations and none of us can avoid being a law breaker.

Won’t apply to our rulers though.


21 posted on 04/27/2012 7:01:36 AM PDT by Texas resident (Hunkered Down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
"There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

"Atlas Shrugged," by Ayn Rand

Seeing people wandering from lane to lane with their eyes on their mobile device rather than the road really pisses me off, but giving the federal government the power to do anything about it will have dire consequences.

Government is the religion of the sociopath.

22 posted on 04/27/2012 7:08:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the sociopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
THIS IS A CLASSIC
23 posted on 04/27/2012 7:10:30 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette
I'm not a smoker, but I told everyone on this board years ago who were all for outlawing smoking that if they got their way on that, sooner or later they would be coming for something YOU like.

This is a good predictor of obamacare, if it doesn't get tossed out, after they MAKE us buy their crappy insurance, they'll be coming around to MAKE us buy whatever their cronies (the ones giving them kickbacks and power) are selling...even a Chevy Volt.
24 posted on 04/27/2012 7:12:10 AM PDT by FrankR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
THIS IS A CLASSIC
25 posted on 04/27/2012 7:13:02 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Why don’t they ban switching radio stations while driving, while they’re at it?


26 posted on 04/27/2012 7:13:47 AM PDT by dfwgator (Don't wake up in a roadside ditch. Get rid of Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
I agree! Texting while walking should be outlawed too! But talking on your phone while driving? What about daydreaming while driving, planning dinner while driving and million other mind games. Sorry I can drive and talk at the same time.
27 posted on 04/27/2012 7:20:53 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yobid

Cell phones are not the problem - it is the behavior of those using them that is the problem. And no law in the world will correct the absence of manners and consideration for others.


28 posted on 04/27/2012 7:24:30 AM PDT by Grams A (The Sun will rise in the East in the morning and God is still on his throne.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Good luck enforcing it Ray.


29 posted on 04/27/2012 7:26:26 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

LaHood is a total turd. I wish only bad things for him in the rest of his life. What a busy-body.


30 posted on 04/27/2012 7:30:16 AM PDT by x1stcav (There's a bunch of us out here spoiling for a fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

It’s different because if the person in the car that you are talking to is a federal official, and he/she sees you doing anything wrong while you are talking with them, the fed will take over driving for you - like they want to take over every other part of your life.


31 posted on 04/27/2012 7:35:38 AM PDT by Pecos (In God we trust. All others - bring data.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

“Is the government going to put the FBI on motorcycles and in highway cruisers? “

Sounds like the plan to me.


32 posted on 04/27/2012 7:36:55 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Said it before, will say it again. The federal government has gotten very good at these types of things, I believe even more so since that day they failed miserably at one of the very few things that actually is the federal government’s responsibility.


33 posted on 04/27/2012 7:40:28 AM PDT by John W (Viva Cristo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

Ya know, while they’re at it, I think that besides using cell phones, smoking, etc. while driving (which, of course, should ALL be banned to save us from ourselves), I think they’ve overlooked something equally dangerous.

I think the Feds need a law that prohibits breaking wind in a car either A) while driving, or B) with a child in the vehicle, whether moving or stationary. I mean, come on.....how much abuse should a child or a passenger of any age in a moving car have to take???

Write your Congressman.


34 posted on 04/27/2012 7:42:44 AM PDT by RightOnline (I am Andrew Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

“LaHood said, however, he was not as concerned about people who eat, apply makeup, or perform other distracting activities in cars because “not everyone does that.”

“But everyone has a cell phone and too many of us think it is OK to talk on our phones while we are driving,” he said at the summit, sponsored by insurance company USAA, the Texas Department of Transportation and Shriners Hospitals for Children.”

LaHood is a fuching moron. I swear to Zeus, I thought this was satire until I saw Rooters was reporting it. So, “everyone” has a cell phone, huh, Mr. Numbnuts? And somehow, because “everyone” has one, then that’s automatically a reason for a Federal law, no doubt enforced by the FBI on motorcycles? Well, first of all, Mr. totally out-of-touch Transportation Secretary, not everyone has a cell phone. And secondly, slaughtering people due to distraction from makeuping, eating, and other distractions is OK because “everyone” isn’t doing it? That makes me feel SO much better, jerk.


35 posted on 04/27/2012 7:44:44 AM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yobid
This bears repeating: “.. I'm so sick of seeing people yacking on their phones while driving worst than drunks.”
36 posted on 04/27/2012 7:45:52 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trailhkr1; yobid
I'm against the feds getting involved in this, but I strongly support state measures to stop this insane epidemic!
Enforcement would be easier than getting drunks off the road because, as you pointed out trailhkr1, most phone using drivers are obvious to their surroundings—a cop could cruise up right next to them and easily see what they're doing!
37 posted on 04/27/2012 7:53:14 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
I suggest that the word “state” be replaced by the word “province”...

How about replacing "state" or "province" with "Turkish village".

38 posted on 04/27/2012 8:00:39 AM PDT by C210N (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

“So what’s next, I can’t talk to my passengers?”

As many of us were taught in Drivers’ Ed:
Yes, talking to your passengers can be a dangerous while driving; IT IS THE CONVERSATION ITSELF, AND THE MIND’S CONCENTRATION ON THAT SUBJECT RATHER THE SURROUNDING ENVIRONMENT THAT MAKES IT DANGEROUS. But, at least with passengers in the same vehicle, there are extra pairs of eyes to help warn you of dangers outside. On the phone, you’re in your only little world!!!


39 posted on 04/27/2012 8:06:34 AM PDT by ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

LaHood is a fracking idiot-driving/walking/biking rules are for states to decide and enforce, not big brother-it is NTFB. And I’d be very happy if LaHood and his compadres are never welcomed to Texas again for any reason-let’s try holding people personally responsible for their own actions again-it worked just fine for centuries...


40 posted on 04/27/2012 8:45:16 AM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson