Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rmlew

Geez the Daunless is an ugly ship. Nothing like the lines of a WWII US tin can.


13 posted on 05/04/2012 6:57:18 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Cuttnhorse
Geez the Daunless is an ugly ship. Nothing like the lines of a WWII US tin can.
HMS Hood had much nicer lines than the similarly armed Bismarck. Function trumps beauty. Furthermore the Type 42 Destroyers were no pieces of art. The Daring Class are called destroyers, but in function they are far closer to the Dido Class cruisers, whose size they more closely approximate.
The Sampson radar on the pyramidal structure is supposed to give the Type 45 better detection of sea skimming missiles than the SPY-1B and D radar in our destroyers and cruisers. In fact, most other countries are now placing their radars higher because of this. This includes the SPY1-D in the new Spanish and proposed Australian destroyers, and the SPY-1F in the Norwegian frigates.
14 posted on 05/04/2012 7:32:08 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson