Skip to comments.Michael Mukasey: Obama and the bin Laden Bragging Rights
Posted on 05/07/2012 9:21:15 AM PDT by nuconvert
The first anniversary of the SEAL Team 6 operation that killed Osama bin Laden brings the news that President Obama plans during the coming campaign to exploit the bragging rights to the achievement. That plan invites scrutiny that is unlikely to benefit him.
Consider the events surrounding the operation. A recently disclosed memorandum from then-CIA Director Leon Panetta shows that the president's celebrated derring-do in authorizing the operation included a responsibility-escape clause: "The timing, operational decision making and control are in Admiral McRaven's hands. The approval is provided on the risk profile presented to the President. Any additional risks are to be brought back to the President for his consideration. The direction is to go in and get bin Laden and if he is not there, to get out."
Which is to say, if the mission went wrong, the fault would be Adm. McRaven's, not the president's. Moreover, the president does not seem to have addressed at all the possibility of seizing material with intelligence valuewhich may explain his disclosure immediately following the event not only that bin Laden was killed, but also that a valuable trove of intelligence had been seized, including even the location of al Qaeda safe-houses. That disclosure infuriated the intelligence community because it squandered the opportunity to exploit the intelligence that was the subject of the boast.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
The people around Odumbass know what they have to do to get the job done
Present a scenario around which they can do what they need to do, while providing the big guy with only enough info to give him plausible deniability when the SHTF
Not a good way to run a country
My thoughts, exactly, plausible deniability.
Hello, House of Representin’? How many Watergates is it going to take?
Mukasey must have been inspired by my Free Republic profile page.