Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/08/2012 6:02:31 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem
Of course.

The Greenies oppose easy access to energy for the masses. They support "clean energy" because clean energy does not work. If we throw resources at wind or solar, then we end up with nothing to show for it, and the masses end up with limited access to energy. That's great!! But, if clean energy were -- somehow -- to result in actual energy resources becoming available, the Greenies would have to oppose it.

This is all about ruling the peasants and making sure that the peasants are not able to stand on their own feet. Energy policy is a tool of enslavement -- it is not in any way intended as a path to a more prosperous future.

2 posted on 05/08/2012 6:10:17 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Like Emmett Till, Trayvon Martin has become simply a stick with which to beat Whites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Ummm... where do they think geothermal heat comes from? Heat release from radioactive decay plays a large part in geothermal energy.

Leftists are idiots and evil.

/johnny

3 posted on 05/08/2012 6:17:44 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

The Sierra Club is opposed to the burning of carbon and will use any ploy to delay,impede and stop all such activity. They are a bizarre association of neopagan earth worshipers. Basically they care little for human beings or their accomplishments. So far their green cloak has protected them scrutiny and exposure. They are sick and dangerous.


4 posted on 05/08/2012 6:18:26 PM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Proving why this is so takes only a modicum of research. The Sierra Club claims that the “gas industry is dirty, dangerous, and running amok.” It continues, saying, “The closer we look at natural gas, the dirtier it appears. . . . If we can’t protect our health and treasured landscapes from the damages caused by the natural gas industry, then we should not drill for natural gas.”

The Lucy Van Pelt Left.

They pulled this with incandescents & CFLs.

7 posted on 05/08/2012 6:33:22 PM PDT by kiryandil (turning Americans into felons, one obnoxious drunk at a time (Zero Tolerance!!!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
The only green that the sierra club is for is


9 posted on 05/08/2012 6:43:48 PM PDT by USS Alaska (Nuke the terrorist savages, start today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

If NG was controlled by gov’t, it would be supported, promoted and praised.

But it is a private resource, so it is opposed, denigrated and disparaged.


11 posted on 05/09/2012 4:31:48 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (When religions have to beg the gov't for a waiver, we are already under socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Two Words: Paul Ehrlich

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_R._Ehrlich

http://www.aim.org/wls/cheap-abundant-energy-is-dangerous/


12 posted on 05/09/2012 9:06:00 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson