Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Baynative
The child looks a lot older than he is--I would have said seven years old. Big kid.

This is porn. Sorry. Child Porn. And the editors of Time will get away with putting this on the cover of a major news magazine so the porn-obsessed with buy it.

Larry Flint hires 18-yr-olds to perform in his porn for big bucks if they happen to look younger than their legal ages. It's called "Barely Legal."

Now here's the opposite...and an extension of the "Mommy Wars"--I happen to think that a child should be weened from this before the first birthday, and I usually get a titty-baby fanatic that thinks it should extend into elementary school...

19 posted on 05/11/2012 6:55:03 AM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mamzelle
"This is porn. Sorry. Child Porn. "

That was my take. The pose of the mother is more suggestive than nurturing and the look on the child's face doesn't seem like a baby finding comfort ... more like a kid trying to look cool for his buddies.

I'm not so sure I believe this a mother and son.

24 posted on 05/11/2012 7:01:09 AM PDT by Baynative (Please check this out - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fFIcZkEzc8I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson