Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP needs Marco Rubio to ward off extinction
BIZPACReview.com ^ | 5/15/2012 | Kingsley Guy

Posted on 05/15/2012 6:48:25 AM PDT by SmileRight

The Republican Party faces a threat to its existence. It’s not an ideological threat, but a demographic and mathematical one. Unless the GOP acts to change the math by broadening its appeal to minorities, it will cease being a major force in American politics.

If you have any doubt about this, look at the numbers:

In 1960, white Americans made up 94 percent of the electorate. By 2010, the figure had dropped to 75 percent.

Among African-Americans, more than 90 percent vote Democratic, and in the 2008 presidential race, 96 percent chose President Obama. For Asian-Americans, a clear majority consistently votes Democratic. In the last presidential election, 56 percent voted for Obama.

Among Hispanic-Americans, the fastest growing segment of the electorate, the ratio of Democrats to Republicans is about 2-to-1. Eight years ago, four out of 10 Hispanics voted for ...

(Excerpt) Read more at bizpacreview.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: demographics; diversity; gop; hispanics; hispanicvote; immigration; marcorubio; trends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
The "establishment" needs to wake up and look for ways to solve the immigration problem instead of avoiding it. It's time to face the facts, the electorate is changing.
1 posted on 05/15/2012 6:48:33 AM PDT by SmileRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

PALIN 2016


2 posted on 05/15/2012 6:52:47 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (Vote for the straight guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

Its time to end this two faced conversation about “race?”


3 posted on 05/15/2012 6:54:18 AM PDT by junta ("Peace is a racket", testimony from crime boss Barrack Hussein Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

The question actually resolves to whether the latest wave of immigrants plans on becoming integrated into the existing population and generating the same or similar levels of productivity or if they plan on being perpetual free riders.

If the former, then I would agree that Marco Rubio is emblematic of exactly the kind of ethnic person we should support (I would no matter his ethnicity, he seems to be an upright man independent of the local source of his bloodline). If the latter, then we may as well fragment now and minimize the pain.


4 posted on 05/15/2012 6:55:30 AM PDT by BelegStrongbow (St. Joseph, patron of fathers, pray for us!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
I automatically assume anyone calling themselves republican peddling the idea that groveling before any specific constituency is full of sh*t.

Pandering, especially to ethnic groups, is exactly what is dividing and destroying this country.

5 posted on 05/15/2012 6:56:17 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

c’mon folks! get real. the VP slot is nothing more than a sop thrown to keep the conservatives on the reservation. think of this position as ‘our biden’. it’s useless.
it’s high time to break away. the GOP establishment has lost its way and doesn’t want to find it. time to move on...


6 posted on 05/15/2012 6:57:12 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

If appealing to minorities means special hand-outs, affirmative action and political correctness then I am afraid that we need to find another way to ‘solve the immigration problem’.


7 posted on 05/15/2012 6:58:18 AM PDT by Bob Buchholz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
Any GOP establishment types who fancy Rubio for VP or even pres need to read my tagline: I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.

Rubio is ineligible for the presidency, as is Obama.

8 posted on 05/15/2012 7:03:12 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (I will vote against ANY presidential candidate who had non-citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Buchholz

I agree with you 100%, the hand-outs need to stop. But we could find a way to integrate those who really want to be a part of our country and not to just reestablish their country here. I especially don’t think the illegals should be given anything. But those who are willing to work for it should have some pathway.


9 posted on 05/15/2012 7:04:01 AM PDT by SmileRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
The immigration problem is that we are taking too many, 1.2 million a year, and most are poor, uneducated, and unskilled. They are adding to a permanent underclass in this country and will vote Democrat.

The U.S. adds one international migrant (net) every 36 seconds. Immigrants account for one in 8 U.S. residents, the highest level in more than 90 years. In 1970 it was one in 21; in 1980 it was one in 16; and in 1990 it was one in 13. In a decade, it will be one in 7, the highest it has been in our history. And by 2050, one in 5 residents of the U.S. will be foreign-born.

Currently, 1.6 million legal and illegal immigrants settle in the country each year; 350,000 immigrants leave each year, resulting in a net immigration of 1.25 million. Since 1970, the U.S. population has increased from 203 million to 310 million, i.e., over 100 million. In the next 40 years, the population will increase by an additional 130 million to 440 million. Three-quarters of the increase in our population since 1970 and the projected increase will be the result of immigration. The U.S., the world’s third most populous nation, has the highest annual rate of population growth of any developed country in the world, i.e., 0.963% (2011 estimate,) principally due to immigration.

87 percent of the 1.2 million legal immigrants entering annually are minorities as defined by the U.S. Government and almost all of the illegal aliens are minorities. By 2019 half of the children 18 and under in the U.S. will be classified as minorities and by 2039, half of the residents of this country will be minorities. Generally, immigrants and minorities vote predominantly for the Democrat Party. Hence, Democrats view immigration as a never-ending source of voters that will make them the permanent majority party.

Since the 1965 Immigration Act, our pro-population growth immigration policies have fueled major demographic changes in a very short period of time. In 1970, non-Hispanic whites comprised 89 percent of the population; today they are 66 percent; and by 2039, they will be 50 percent. The Democrats, under the banner of multiculturalism and diversity, have forged a political coalition that depends on individuals coalescing around racial and ethnic identities rather than the issues. The continuing and increasing flow of minority immigrants, mostly poor and uneducated, provides a natural constituency for the Democrats, which see them as their principal source of political power.

10 posted on 05/15/2012 7:06:32 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: junta

The problem, as I see it, relates to this idea that whites are alone in voting on the right. Apparently whites have a monopoly on conservatism, and we’re fighting an uphill, into-the-wind battle.

I don’t believe that.


11 posted on 05/15/2012 7:07:44 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
But those who are willing to work for it should have some pathway.

There is a way - get in line.

No shortcuts, no line jumpers.

No law breakers. We have too many of those already.

12 posted on 05/15/2012 7:07:53 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: skeeter; SmileRight

Exactly. Since the GOP has been working toward extinction since 1960, why would they want to ward it off?


13 posted on 05/15/2012 7:14:15 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

"But we could find a way to integrate those who really want to be a part of our country and not to just reestablish their country here."

Call me crazy, but I think we already have a process for people who want to become legal citizens of this country...

14 posted on 05/15/2012 7:14:44 AM PDT by Qbert ("The best defense against usurpatory government is an assertive citizenry" - William F. Buckley, Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight
But we could find a way to integrate those who really want to be a part of our country and not to just reestablish their country here. I especially don’t think the illegals should be given anything. But those who are willing to work for it should have some pathway.

Why should we find a "pathway" for lawbreakers who entered illegally flaunting our laws and national sovereignty? Lawbreakers who committed identity theft, tax evasion, working illegally, etc. deserve a "pathway?" How about the several million intending immigrants waiting overseas for their turn to enter after completing the paperwork, background investigations, physcials, etc.? How fair is it to them for the lawbreakers to get to the head of the line by allowing them to stay and work here, i.e., amnesty?

We had a one-time amnesty in 1986. The supporters said it would the first and last amnesty. The USG estimated that 1 million would apply, but the true number turned out to be 2.7 million. The process was rife with fraud. Now we have 12 to 20 million illegal aliens in this country.

Any legislation that legalizes the status of those who broke our laws by entering our country illegally and allows them to stay and work here is amnesty. We must not only prevent the Democrats and some moderate Republicans from hijacking the meaning of the word amnesty, but the public must be made aware about the true impact of an amnesty. The Heritage Foundation concluded that the cost of amnesty would be $2.6 trillion just for increased entitlement program costs. And the number of additional LEGAL immigrants who would join those who were the recipients of amnesty through chain migration, i.e., family reunification, would approach 70 million over a 20-year period, assuming there are only 12 million illegal aliens. We cannot assimilate such numbers. An amnesty would destroy the United States of America with the stroke of a pen.

15 posted on 05/15/2012 7:15:52 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Hey, LBJ, is that you?


16 posted on 05/15/2012 7:16:10 AM PDT by ngat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

Exactly what does Rubio have to offer? That he originally sounded like a Conservative, but seems to have changed his mind after the Right fawned all over him without vetting him? He has as much “experience” as Obama had when he was put in the WH.


17 posted on 05/15/2012 7:16:45 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

How the heck do we keep winning elections? We’ve won most everything possible over the past 28 months.

We win them by selling our principles and pulling people to our views. The latino population is not the black population. It is diverse and can be won over.

Rubio as VP is not the only way to accomplish this. In fact, attaching Rubio to a candidate like Romney may ultimately do more harm than good. Rubio can stand on his own w/o coat tales. A Rubio keynote address at the convention would be a launching pad possibly even beyond VP. That’s how Clinton and Obama got their start into presidential politics...as well as Mario Cuomo before that.


18 posted on 05/15/2012 7:16:45 AM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

Skin tone is not a conservative value. I think you need to talk to the Demonic Party about that.


19 posted on 05/15/2012 7:19:15 AM PDT by central_va ( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmileRight

***The Republican Party faces a threat to its existence. It’s not an ideological threat, but a demographic and mathematical one.***

I disagree. The Republican party’s woes are rooted in ideology coupled with a severe lack of cajones.

This race BS really needs to stop. Fact is people all around the world want to come here because of TRADITIONAL AMERICAN VALUES, namely, freedom, liberty, rule of law, a market economy, rights that come from God and not man or woman.

But since the GOP doesn’t have the guts to stand up for these principles, their days are numbered.


20 posted on 05/15/2012 7:22:25 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Forget the GOP and build the Constitution Party, because the status quo is no longer the way to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson