OK, one other question: Have you even read the PDF? I gave my reasoning for how we know that Bennett dropped the request on the actual form, and it never claimed that the requirement to drop the actual request form was in the emails.
Bennett said he got what he had asked for and he clearly did NOT get what he originally asked for. On the form he submitted he asked for “C = legally valid”. What he got was A=B. And that was regarding the critical pieces of information for determining Presidential eligibility.
Yes, I read it. I disagree with your conclusions. Bennett did not drop any part of his request and he did get everything he asked for and more.
Yes, the form to request a certified copy of the birth certificate includes the date and place of birth and the parents’ names. (It also includes gender, which you have not mentioned.) That information is required so the HDoH can uniquely identify the birth certificate for which the verification is being requested.
338-14.3 stipulates that the applicant will receive a verification of the existence of a certificate. If Bennett had submitted only that one form, he likely would have received a verification limited to: “A birth certificate is on file with the Department of Health indicating that Barack Hussein Obama, II was born in Honolulu, Hawaii.” And according to section (b) of 338-14.3, that verification would certify the event itself and the facts supplied on the form. 338-14.3 does not require the HDoH to restate the data submitted on the form.
338-14.3 does, however, require the HDoH to specifically verify “any other” information supplied, which they did. So had Bennett specifically included the date and time of birth, parents’ names, and gender with the other 10 items he requested, he likely would have gotten specific verification for those individual items.
Bennett didn’t ask specifically for verification of the name of the delivering physician, but he got a verification for it nonetheless when he asked them to verify that the WH LFBC was a true and accurate representation of the original vital record. Hawaii responded that the information (all of it by implication) matches what is on file in their original. So they verified the name of the delivering physician and everything else on the LFBC.