Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: Obamacare Will Be Upheld 6-3, ‘Because I Know the Constitution’
CNSNews ^

Posted on 05/31/2012 9:58:36 AM PDT by Sub-Driver

Pelosi: Obamacare Will Be Upheld 6-3, ‘Because I Know the Constitution’ By Elizabeth Harrington May 31, 2012 Subscribe to Elizabeth Harrington's posts

(CNSNews.com) – House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said the Supreme Court will uphold the constitutionality of President Barack Obama’s health care law, predicting a 6-3 decision because, as she remarked, “I know the Constitution.”

At a Capitol Hill press conference on Thursday, a reporter asked Pelosi, “Madame Leader, the Supreme Court is getting ready to rule in the next month or so on the health care bill, and you’ve expressed pretty high confidence – I think you said 6-3 – but I’m just wondering if Democrats and the Democratic leadership have had any discussions or meetings to plan for any sort of contingency plan given the possibility that the court could strike provisions from the law or the whole law, I’m wondering if Democrats are having any meetings to discuss contingency plans?”

Pelosi, in reference to how the nine-judge court will rule, said, “6-3. That’s it. 6-3.”

She was then asked why she was so confident about her prediction.

“Because I know the Constitution,” Pelosi said. “This bill is ironclad. It is ironclad.”

“Nobody was frivolous with the Constitution and the health of the American people in writing the bill,” she said. “So, that’s where my confidence springs from, the merit of the bill and the nature of the Constitution.”

“The makeup of the court, well, we’ll see,” Pelosi said.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; liberalfascism; obamacare; pelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Nifster

Pelicanosi can say anything, because when she is proven wrong the fifth column media will not report her errors. She ain’t stupid, she’s just evil.


21 posted on 05/31/2012 10:16:57 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: kabar

and the pint is???


22 posted on 05/31/2012 10:17:17 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Is she serious? Is she serious?


23 posted on 05/31/2012 10:17:45 AM PDT by JPG (Don't just talk about it, make it happen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
Like most of her reality, it does not, nor could it exist, so she lives in a delusional fantasy land where a naked Obama rides his pet unicorn across rainbows.



/sarc
24 posted on 05/31/2012 10:18:06 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

ooops I meant to say and the point is but I think I like the typo better


25 posted on 05/31/2012 10:18:57 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Would it be wrong to pray to God that he put this woman(?) out of her misery?


26 posted on 05/31/2012 10:21:51 AM PDT by SMM48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster
and the pint is???

Oh! Oh! I know!....

Half a quart?

27 posted on 05/31/2012 10:22:05 AM PDT by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

28 posted on 05/31/2012 10:22:27 AM PDT by PLD (It is time the freeloaders leave the white house and go back to the hell hole where they came from..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
1. She is crazy.

2. It is the game of expectation in order to row-up the base when expectations are not met.

3. It is wishful thinking based on a faulty left-wing premise that the it be 5-4 and Roberts will cast the vote in favor to make the decision “Nonpartisan”.

29 posted on 05/31/2012 10:25:43 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SMM48

We need a new amendment that says if a politician makes a statement like this, when they’re proven to be incorrect they have to resign and everyone who voted for them has to sit out the next 2 elections.


30 posted on 05/31/2012 10:25:43 AM PDT by CarmichaelPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I think we have discovered another member of the Choom Gang, however, she has moved on to smoking crack!


31 posted on 05/31/2012 10:26:04 AM PDT by Batman11 (Obama's poll numbers are so low the Kenyans are claiming he was born in the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I don’t care what the article says. The headline is a Lolzapalooza!


32 posted on 05/31/2012 10:26:13 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Viva Christo Rey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Not only is the woman a Catholic Theologian, she’s a Constitutional Scholar to boot!


33 posted on 05/31/2012 10:26:19 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (FUMR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So if it turns out the other way will you publicly admit you don’t know the constitution?


34 posted on 05/31/2012 10:27:48 AM PDT by samtheman (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2888480/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Someone should have reminded her that they had to pass it to see what was in it.


35 posted on 05/31/2012 10:32:37 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Hey,you Botox freak....you've admitted to not having read the legislation.How in hell can you claim that it will be upheld???????
36 posted on 05/31/2012 10:34:38 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Julia: another casualty of the "War on Poverty")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I really believe they say this stuff because they have been tipped off.

Hope not. But I can’t believe liberals on the court don’t leak stuff.


37 posted on 05/31/2012 10:35:04 AM PDT by Williams (No Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Nancy has become an expert on the Constitution in her mind (just don't ever ask for specific sections of the Constitution) every since her only way to deal with this question was the very embarrassing “are you serious? are you serious?” response (because she had no idea what else to say.)

Nancy is a mental lightweight (as is Patti Murray in the Senate and many other Dems.) They talk a fair game as long as they stay on scrip, but once they are required to think on their feet they fail.

The following are the relevant portions from CNSNews.com’s Matt Cover’s October 22, 2009 article about Pelosi curtly dismissing the Constitution’s relevance to ObamaCare:

When CNSNews.com asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Thursday where the Constitution authorized Congress to order Americans to buy health insurance—a mandate included in both the House and Senate versions of the health care bill—Pelosi dismissed the question by saying: “Are you serious? Are you serious?”

Pelosi’s press secretary later responded to written follow-up questions from CNSNews.com by emailing CNSNews.com a press release on the “Constitutionality of Health Insurance Reform,” that argues that Congress derives the authority to mandate that people purchase health insurance from its constitutional power to regulate interstate commerce.

38 posted on 05/31/2012 10:35:32 AM PDT by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

A pint’s a pound the world around?


39 posted on 05/31/2012 10:37:00 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Kagan leaked?


40 posted on 05/31/2012 10:37:29 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson