Posted on 06/01/2012 8:52:28 AM PDT by Former Fetus
So we can ban super-sized drinks, but not this barbaric procedure?
A handful of GOPers voted against this commonsense bill that would have protected vulnerable women from the hideous coercion of their husbands or partners who want offspring of one gender over another (usually boys over girls).
China's vicious campaign against girls has arrived on American shores. Rep. Ron Paul an OB/GYN, voted with the Democrats, perhaps out of a federalism concern.
The argument by Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee and other left-wing abortion fanatics is that this law would have led to women being "dragged out of doctor's offices" in an effort to prevent their "personal decisions" as doctors try to guess women's motivations for the procedure.
(Excerpt) Read more at jewishworldreview.com ...
What a shame, that a super-sized drink is considered more important than a newborn baby girl! Lord, have mercy on us!
If I could draw a political cartoon, I would draw rows and rows of pews, packed with donkeys sitting in them all singing and holding hymnals with a sign at the entrance saying ‘Abortion Clinic.’
There is nothing a democrat will not do in the name of their god Abortion.
Ron Paul....what an ass
Salve
What evil world we are living...
aaaaaaaaayayayayayaaaaaay
Merci.
More from the Democrat war on women and life.
Boner killed it by scheduling it in “emergency” session - which avoids debate but mandates a 2/3rds majority.
I hadn’t seen the roll call on this vote, and I was shocked to read that he had voted against the bill. Did he find a place in the Constitution where sex-selection abortions are allowed?
Salve
This evil has been going on for so long in other countries too.
Their blood of innocent cries out for vengeance in front of Throne of God!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Babies are gift from God, many of you here are parents, and you know the feeling when you hold your child in hands, when you see them so innocent and so close to you, little smile, touch of love.
These people are evil, no they are not, and they are daemons incarnated. I feel like I am living in Ancient times of human sacrifices. Baal is their master now.
I am so tired.
Merci.
Then I guess ‘rats won’t oppose abortions based on the sexual orientation of the fetus (if and when it is ever “proven” that homosexuality is genetically determined, which I don’t believe but ‘rats do).
I’d love to see the look on their faces at Planned Parenthood when some pregnant girl walked through the front door and said, “The geneticist told me my fetus will be homosexual. So I want to abort it.”
They can’t complain now, right?
Man, I’m terrified what God is going to do to end this wickedness.
Yes: I am not surprised at Ron Paul’s vote. I have always said he was a nutbag.
The mostly overlooked content of the bill banned not only sex-selection, but also RACE-based selections.
This is no longer my America... I don’t know exactly what it is, but my America has already died.
When the People of America no longer respect the sanctity of life, the People are no longer worthy of that gift.
This is no longer my America... I don’t know exactly what it is, but my America has already died.
When the People of America no longer respect the sanctity of life, the People are no longer worthy of that gift.
If abortion for sex-selection is a “barbaric procedure” and should be banned, then every abortion is a barbaric procedure and should be banned. There is no reasonable line between “no abortion” and “any abortion, any time, for any reason.”
The pro-aborts understand this, and that’s why they fight every measure that would imply there is a moral issue with killing an unborn baby for any reason.
This is no longer my America... I don’t know exactly what it is, but my America has already died.
When the People of America no longer respect the sanctity of life, the People are no longer worthy of that gift.
Ron Paul just made my evil idiot list.
So, let’s carry this argument a little further out.
For the sake of argument, let’s agree that people are born gay and not a product of a dysfunctional environment. So, we agree they are born with these attributes, just like a boy is born with boy parts and a girl is born with girl parts.
Since a person is born that way, we’ll also presume there is somehow a way to determine this gay state while the baby is in the womb (because obviously, we can tell the gender very early on).
Now, the expectant parents are informed that their fetus has tested positive for gay. (Here’s the part): They decide to abort the baby because it’s gay.
How would Mr and Mrs. Liberal thinker view abortion in this case? Be all for it? I bet lib heads would ‘splode.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.