Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Revokes Zimmerman's Bond
WLS AM Chicago ^ | 1 June 2012 | Unknown

Posted on 06/01/2012 11:50:10 AM PDT by Lurker

ORLANDO, Fla. (WLS) - Prosecutors asked a judge Friday to revoke the bond of the neighborhood watch volunteer charged with killing 17-year-old Trayvon Martin.

Prosecutors said in a motion that 28-year-old George Zimmerman and his family misled them about his finances when testifying during a bail hearing that allowed him to be released from jail on a $150,000 bond. Prosecutor Bernie De la Rionda asked for the revocation during a hearing to help determine if prosecutors and the defense can stop the public release of certain documents in the case.

During the bond hearing in April, Zimmerman's relatives testified they had limited funds. Zimmerman's attorney said several days later that he had discovered his client had raised more than $200,000 from a website. At the time of the hearing, about $135,000 had been raised, and that money wasn't disclosed at the bond hearing.

"This court was led to believe they didn't have a single penny," said Prosecutor Bernie De la Rionda. "It was misleading and I don't know what words to use other than it was a blatant lie."

Defense attorney Mark O'Mara said it was an innocent misunderstanding and that Zimmerman wasn't using that money for his expenses and wasn't sure what he could use the money for. He said Zimmerman used the houses of his parents and grandmother as collateral for the bond.

Prosecutors also said in the motion that Zimmerman didn't disclose he had a second passport. Zimmerman turned his passport over to the court at the bond hearing as a measure that would prevent him from fleeing the country.

Zimmerman is pleading not guilty to second-degree murder and claims self-defense. Zimmerman shot Martin last February during a confrontation at a gated community of townhouses in Sanford, Fla., where Zimmerman lived and where Martin was visiting his father's fiancee.

The delay in an arrest for 44 days prompted protests nationwide and led to Sanford's police chief stepping aside so emotions could cool down.

At Friday's hearing, De la Rionda and O'Mara also asked a judge to stop the public release of witness names and statements made by Zimmerman to police officers. Those documents normally are part of the public record under Florida law.

"What's occurring, unfortunately, are cases are being tried in the public sector as opposed to in the courtroom," De La Rionda told Circuit Judge Kenneth Lester. "We are in a new age with Twitter, Facebook, and all these things I've never heard of before in my career.

Everybody gets to find out intimate details about witnesses that never occurred before. Witnesses are going to be reluctant to get involved."

A consortium of more than a dozen media groups, including The Associated Press, asked the judge to ignore the request, saying such records are presumed to be publicly available under Florida law.

Rachel Fugate, an attorney for the Orlando Sentinel, cited the Casey Anthony trial as an example of a highly publicized case in which a jury was able to be seated despite intense media coverage. The Florida mother was acquitted last year of killing her 2-year-old daughter.

"Discovery in Florida has traditionally been open ... and Florida hasn't encountered problems seating juries and giving defendants fair trials," Fugate said.

O'Mara said Friday on a website that he doesn't expect the case to be ready for trial until next year.

O'Mara said he expects to call on 50 witnesses who need to be deposed before he decides whether to file a "stand your ground" motion which would ask for a hearing before a judge without a jury. At the hearing, Zimmerman would argue self-defense under the Florida law which gives wide latitude to use deadly force rather than retreat in a fight if people believe they are in danger of being killed or seriously injured.

The Associated Press Contributed To This Report


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: blackkk; georgezimmerman; saintskittles; trayvon; trayvonmartin; zimmerman; zimmermanbondrevoked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-221 next last
Unbelievable.
1 posted on 06/01/2012 11:50:12 AM PDT by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurker

This is what happens when you displease the State.


2 posted on 06/01/2012 11:52:03 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Brazen harrassment and setup for murder. They want Zimmerman in jail so he can be whacked by another prisoner (no doubt paid), and get them off the hook for falsely charging him.


3 posted on 06/01/2012 11:52:47 AM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

And nothing will be done to help Zimmerman.


4 posted on 06/01/2012 11:53:07 AM PDT by wastedyears ("God? I didn't know he was signed onto the system.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

These prosecutors are beyond evil.


5 posted on 06/01/2012 11:53:20 AM PDT by samtheman (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2888480/posts?page=2#2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Zimmerman is getting set up.


6 posted on 06/01/2012 11:54:16 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Alright. The press is going to the level of "Every Word They Write Is A Lie".

The headline says the bond IS revoked.

But in the body of the article, all I can see is that the prosecution is ASKING for the bond to be revoked.

Sheesh.

7 posted on 06/01/2012 11:56:31 AM PDT by Lazamataz (People who resort to Godwin's Law are just like Hitler.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
To Zimmerman (where ever you are):

There are numerous ways to visit other countries without a passport.

Use one of them. Come back after the revolution.

8 posted on 06/01/2012 11:56:51 AM PDT by jimjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Where does it say the judge actually granted it?


9 posted on 06/01/2012 11:56:51 AM PDT by Jaded (Really? Seriously?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Zimm is being set up.


10 posted on 06/01/2012 11:57:14 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The heading says the bond was revoked, but no mention of it in the article. Did I miss something?
11 posted on 06/01/2012 11:57:22 AM PDT by LuvFreeRepublic ( (#withNewt))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Disgusting. I still can’t believe the trial gonna be pushed back that far - El Presidente needs the riots come September/October.


12 posted on 06/01/2012 11:57:34 AM PDT by mykroar (October race riots bring November martial law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Duke LaCrosse all over again —maybe worse.


13 posted on 06/01/2012 11:58:03 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Am I just missing it? No where in this story does it say that the bond was revoked. It says the prosecuters filed a motion to revoke bond, but this story says nothing about it being revoked, other than the headline.


14 posted on 06/01/2012 11:58:59 AM PDT by TexasNative2000 (Jimmy Carter's incompetence + Richard Nixon's paranoia = Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

this is a stretch. He gets punished for raising money to defend himself?


15 posted on 06/01/2012 11:59:18 AM PDT by newnhdad (Where will you be during the Election Riots of 2012/2013?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jaded

I used the identical title to the article on WLS except for the fact I misspelled “judge”. I can’t find it in the article either.


16 posted on 06/01/2012 11:59:44 AM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

The prosecution in twisting Capt. Zimmerman’s words regarding a little bit of cash in his bank account and the alleged second passport to screw him now by revoking his bond.

A true tragedy of our justice system.


17 posted on 06/01/2012 12:01:00 PM PDT by Uncle Slayton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
Prosecution kicking up dust for lack of a case.
Dirty bastards!
18 posted on 06/01/2012 12:04:36 PM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
It appears the Title is misleading.

All I read is the "Prosecutor" is ASKING for the bond to be revoked.

And the issues that are given as cause has ALREADY been addressed with the court days after the initial hearing. Meaning Zimm et all came forward voluntarily with the data to the court.

Yes a little clumsy, but appropriately cleaned up

19 posted on 06/01/2012 12:05:13 PM PDT by saywhatagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
all I can see is that the prosecution is ASKING for the bond to be revoked

More msm lies. The msm knows most people don't read past the headlines so they're still playing at convicting him.

20 posted on 06/01/2012 12:05:24 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Slayton

Oh stow the Capt. Zimmerman crap already. This was every reason to revoke bond. Hiding money + failing to properly surrender his passport = flight risk.


21 posted on 06/01/2012 12:07:53 PM PDT by Melas (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
This is what happens when you displease the State lie in a court of law.
22 posted on 06/01/2012 12:10:22 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

You’ve got that figured out already, eh?


23 posted on 06/01/2012 12:12:33 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
You’ve got that figured out already, eh?

What's to figure out? What's to defend? He was ordered to reveal his financial assets, and failed to do so completely. He was ordered to surrender his passport, and apparently failed to disclose the existence of a second passport.

24 posted on 06/01/2012 12:15:12 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

The Almighty State has the absolute right to know everything, doesn’t it? Except, when it comes to the trial, the background on the poor unfortunate Trayvon, right?


25 posted on 06/01/2012 12:16:58 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

Ok, apparently other FR threads show it is being revoked.


26 posted on 06/01/2012 12:17:25 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
The Almighty State has the absolute right to know everything, doesn’t it? Except, when it comes to the trial, the background on the poor unfortunate Trayvon, right?

When setting bail and determining whether a defendant is a flight risk, yes, a court is entitled to know about the defendant's finances and any passports that would enable the defendant to leave the country.

27 posted on 06/01/2012 12:19:16 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

http://www.miamiherald.com/2012/04/27/v-print/2770968/zimmerman-attorney-to-tell-judge.html

Crump and the race baiters are behind this.


28 posted on 06/01/2012 12:19:49 PM PDT by Jaded (Really? Seriously?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

This fiasco would be history right now if Zimmerman had claimed that he was in the country illegally.


29 posted on 06/01/2012 12:20:40 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Free Stuff or Freedom! You Decide 2012.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

There are? I haven’t seen one. Can you provide a link?


30 posted on 06/01/2012 12:21:03 PM PDT by ken in texas (I was taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder to find any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Zimm is being set up.

_____________________________________

Yep, he never should have listened to the prosecutors when they told him, "Don't report the $135K or the second passport...it's cool."

31 posted on 06/01/2012 12:22:08 PM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

You are right. Now, does the State have the right to put the defendant on bail under surveillance and record his conversations?


32 posted on 06/01/2012 12:24:33 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Zimm’s family has posted 2 homes. That is more than enough collateral.


33 posted on 06/01/2012 12:25:45 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

The prosecutors are doing an Al Capone on Zimmerman - can’t convict him of 2nd degree, nail him on perjury.


34 posted on 06/01/2012 12:26:45 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker
"Brazen harrassment and setup for murder. They want Zimmerman in jail so he can be whacked by another prisoner (no doubt paid), and get them off the hook for falsely charging him."

Or an attempt to put him in a no bail or prohibitively high bail situation with a trial not until next year to try and force him to plead guilty to a lesser charge to avoid a year in jail before trial.

35 posted on 06/01/2012 12:29:43 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bgill
Never mind. One showed up just after I hit refresh after my response:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2890425/posts

36 posted on 06/01/2012 12:29:51 PM PDT by ken in texas (I was taught to respect my elders but it keeps getting harder to find any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

OUTRAGEOUS


37 posted on 06/01/2012 12:30:36 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

Oh, you mean it’s ok to lie to the court then?


38 posted on 06/01/2012 12:30:56 PM PDT by wtc911 (Amigo - you've been had.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
You are right. Now, does the State have the right to put the defendant on bail under surveillance and record his conversations?

Is there any indication that the State did so in this case? The State apparently has recordings of his conversations prior to the Bond hearing, when he was in jail. Jail phone conversations are routinely monitored.

In any event, depending on the circumstance, the State likely can have the right to put a defendant on bail under surveilance, and to monitor his conversations as well. Bail is an alternative to being locked up, and so judges have wide latitude to set conditions of bail. If monitoring/surveillance are a condition of bail, then, yes, the State can monitor and surveil.

39 posted on 06/01/2012 12:31:16 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Jaded; Lurker
From the LA Times

"A judge has revoked the bond of the neighborhood watch volunteer charged with killing 17-year-old Trayvon Martin and ordered him returned to jail within 48 hours.

http://www.latimes.com/news/la-zimmerman-must-surrender-bond-revoked,0,1853909.story

40 posted on 06/01/2012 12:32:36 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Don’t you think we should wait until all the information is available and not relying solely on the msm before making a decision? I will wait for all the facts to come out as they will with time before jumping to any conclusions.


41 posted on 06/01/2012 12:33:53 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

You got it Revolting cat, they’ll create a crime if need be to get Zimmerman—just as was done to Scooter Libby.


42 posted on 06/01/2012 12:34:15 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

” Oh, you mean it’s ok to lie to the court then?”

Of course not.


43 posted on 06/01/2012 12:36:10 PM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

According to Rush, some BS excuse for not telling his wife about some extra money in his paypal account and having an extra passport.


44 posted on 06/01/2012 12:38:04 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
Don’t you think we should wait until all the information is available and not relying solely on the msm before making a decision? I will wait for all the facts to come out as they will with time before jumping to any conclusions.

I'm not relying on the MSM. Everything's in the public record, and Zimmerman's own lawyer acknowledged that Zimmerman did not disclose the money or the second passport. What other information are you looking for?

45 posted on 06/01/2012 12:38:23 PM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

And on a Friday...so he can’t have another hearing before Monday. I expect there will be an “Accident” in the jail this weekend..... Zimmerman should have run for Mexico or South America before he was charged! I believe there is little chance of a “fair” trial.


46 posted on 06/01/2012 12:39:40 PM PDT by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
Oh, you mean it’s ok to lie to the court then?

It's not clear if he lied to the court. The money in question might not be under his control. I don't know how the defense fund is set up. He obviously thought that putting up TWO houses to guarantee bail was his best option.

As for the passport, perhaps the original order was for him to turn in his US passport, and he had another.

There's not enough information for me to say that he lied to the court.

47 posted on 06/01/2012 12:40:17 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

“This is what happens when you displease the State lie in a court of law”
*****************************************************************
Oh, it’s YOU again—here to defend the actions of oppressive governmental statists.


48 posted on 06/01/2012 12:42:13 PM PDT by House Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

That’s a cheesy and lame excuse.


49 posted on 06/01/2012 12:43:05 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
Oh, it’s YOU again—here to defend the actions of oppressive governmental statists.

He's been trolling for quite awhile here under the radar, but he's been on mine for years.

50 posted on 06/01/2012 12:44:48 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson