To: SeekAndFind
One note about PPP’s accuracy... just a day before the Wisconsin recall elections, their polling says that Walker would win by 3 percentage points.
The result : Walker by over 7.5%. PPP was OFF by 4.5 points.
2 posted on
06/06/2012 6:18:07 AM PDT by
SeekAndFind
(bOTRT)
To: SeekAndFind
The problem we have is the way they set up the rules for this.
A under vote is an automatic NO vote.
Seems to me when they did the transportation amendment a under vote was a YES vote.
To: SeekAndFind
One note about PPPs accuracy... just a day before the Wisconsin recall elections, their polling says that Walker would win by 3 percentage points. The result : Walker by over 7.5%. PPP was OFF by 4.5 points.Or, put another way, it was off by 150%.
4 posted on
06/06/2012 6:20:27 AM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: SeekAndFind
What poll had Walker winning by 8% Sunday or over the weekend?
5 posted on
06/06/2012 6:22:24 AM PDT by
snarkytart
(http://www.freerepubli224%2C1)
To: SeekAndFind
What poll had Walker winning by 8% Sunday or over the weekend?
6 posted on
06/06/2012 6:22:39 AM PDT by
snarkytart
(http://www.freerepubli224%2C1)
To: SeekAndFind
One note about PPPs accuracy... just a day before the Wisconsin recall elections, their polling says that Walker would win by 3 percentage points. If I recall correctly, they also had the North Carolina gay marriage ban a dead heat going into the election and it passed with a 20 point margin. They tend to way over sample democrats and under sample republicans, not surprising considering they are little better than a left wing push poll. I stick to Rasmussen.
8 posted on
06/06/2012 6:56:24 AM PDT by
apillar
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson