Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Navy expands 5th Fleet's gulf base
UPI ^ | 6/9/12 | UPI

Posted on 06/09/2012 12:12:53 PM PDT by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 06/09/2012 12:13:06 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Jean S
There is a major campaign underway to make Obama look tough on defense to contrast him with Romney who he will paint as having no foreign policy experience.

The "slam Bain", the "slam Mormonism" and "divide conservatives" strategies are all failing so look for Obama and his MSM allies to double down on the National Defense strategy.

3 posted on 06/09/2012 12:27:27 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
Doubling Manama, reopening Clark and Subic Bay on top of 250 billion in defense spending cuts?
4 posted on 06/09/2012 12:27:43 PM PDT by exnavy (May the Lord bless and keep our troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

Don’t think the PI bases will be reopened like the old days.


5 posted on 06/09/2012 12:39:50 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
How about any time we expand a base, we remove one. Like removing forces from Gemany, South Korea, Japan, England, etc. Why is it in our national security interests to pay for the defense of rich allies?

Seems more like we're taking it in the pooper.
6 posted on 06/09/2012 12:58:19 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
How about any time we expand a base, we remove one. Like removing forces from Gemany, South Korea, Japan, England, etc. Why is it in our national security interests to pay for the defense of rich allies?

Seems more like we're taking it in the pooper.
7 posted on 06/09/2012 12:58:37 PM PDT by andyk (Go Juan Pablo!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk

We need troops overseas to deter any kind of agression against us.

It is important to have 37,000 troops in Japan and 28,500 in South Korea and 42,500 in Hawaii and 21,300 in Alaska and 4,200 in Guam.

This way we are able to have troops and naval forces all over the Pacific Ocean to deter agression from China.


8 posted on 06/09/2012 1:14:59 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jean S
"Did I hear someone say GOLF?"


9 posted on 06/09/2012 1:34:07 PM PDT by Iron Munro (John Adams: 'Two ways to enslave a country. One is by the sword, the other is by debt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Obongo Bozo’s foreign policy “credentials” are more credible than his other “credentials?”

I don’t think so!


10 posted on 06/09/2012 3:47:36 PM PDT by Taxman (So that the beautiful pressure does not diminish!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

It is becoming more and more reasonable for the USN to consider making its own, modular floating island base.

Such floating bases have been considered for many years, and there are many possible variations to the concept, based on need. Conceptually, it would likely be somewhat like small carriers, with large, interlocking flight decks. As needed, they could split apart to facilitate rapidly moving great distances.

Individual ships within the formation would specialize so that as a group they would be far more powerful than individually. With all that deck space, it could launch an air armada of drones that would be very hard to beat, then split apart for command and control of the armada so as not to present such a large target.


11 posted on 06/09/2012 3:56:16 PM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy

Something like “Stargate: Atlantis”?


12 posted on 06/09/2012 4:13:29 PM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925
This way we are able to have troops and naval forces all over the Pacific Ocean to deter agression from China.

LOL, China is not investing billions upon billions into the United States just to go to war with us. Not even two years ago, the governor of my state, Rick Perry, went over to China and lobbied them to buy into Texas oil and gas fields. And they did, to the tune of billions of dollars. They are buying up debt, they are buying their way into our lives, you can't walk 30 feet in a Wal-Mart without encountering something made in China. You can't buy a computer from anybody that wasn't made in China. 20-30 years from now, the American aerospace industry will have gone the way of the American computer industry. Those jobs will be in China.

If they want a war with us, it will not be some messy military affair that they can't win. They'll just dump all of their investments or make other financial moves that just gut our economy or wipe out another segment of the American middle class. Those kinds of moves will do more harm to this country than anything they could do militarily.

If you are looking for a war with China, I hate to break it to you my friend, but the war is over and China won. They have the keys to our economy, and we paid them to take them.
13 posted on 06/09/2012 4:19:04 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yefragetuwrabrumuy
It is becoming more and more reasonable for the USN to consider making its own, modular floating island base.

Individual ships within the formation would specialize so that as a group they would be far more powerful than individually. With all that deck space, it could launch an air armada of drones that would be very hard to beat, then split apart for command and control of the armada so as not to present such a large target.



I have a brother in the offshore oil industry - he's got a services company. I've seen what's required to maneuver ships and structures the size of what you are saying. It's not pretty and they would be incredibly vulnerable, and it's very time consuming and resource intensive. It would be far cheaper to just have long range drones and some carriers.
14 posted on 06/09/2012 4:22:18 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: andyk
How about any time we expand a base, we remove one. Like removing forces from Gemany, South Korea, Japan, England, etc. Why is it in our national security interests to pay for the defense of rich allies?

While I think we spend way too much in contributing money and materials directly to other nations, especially certain nations in the Middle East that both Bushes, Clinton, and now Obama are way too fond of, there are good reasons to have some of those bases. Take Germany for instance - major transport hub and major medical facilities. Those aren't things you want placed in a forward position if you can avoid it - you want them in stable allies. Lot of wounded soldiers and Marines coming out of the Middle East pass through the US hospitals in Germany.

I do agree though, we are way too involved militarily with other nations. Some nations, we don't have a choice - if we don't fight them there, they will fight us here. But others....I really question the motives. Makes me think they have lobbyists working for them.
15 posted on 06/09/2012 4:28:10 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr

The Chinese manufacturing sector is only slightly larger than the USA.

$1.922 Trillion VS $1.885 Trillion

The USA is able to manufacture $1.885 Trillion of goods in 2010 with only 11.6 million workers.

China needs over 100 million workers to manufacture $1.922 Trillion worth of goods in 2010.

China owns $1.17 Trillion of US government debt. That is only 8% of the $15.7 Trillion national debt.

We could easily print $1.17 Trillion and pay off the debt to China.


16 posted on 06/09/2012 5:13:38 PM PDT by moonshot925
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: exnavy; Eric in the Ozarks

>reopening Clark and Subic Bay on top of 250 billion in defense spending cuts?

Negative. Some of these facilities were damaged by volcanic action and there are extensive private businesses set up on these facilities.
What will happen is an increase in Navy port of call visits and thats about it.
Reading the media take on these actions can lead one who is on the ground to wonder if they exist in a parallel universe.


17 posted on 06/09/2012 6:42:07 PM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925

“This way we are able to have troops and naval forces all over the Pacific Ocean to deter agression from China.”

Exactly right. China is beginning to act in the Pacific just like Japan did leading up to WWII.


18 posted on 06/09/2012 7:25:25 PM PDT by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Obama will war on Iran to re-elect Obama ...


19 posted on 06/09/2012 8:31:21 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jean S

Obama will war on Iran to re-elect Obama ...


20 posted on 06/09/2012 8:31:35 PM PDT by dodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson