Teen Radio Host Who Ranted Against Gays Dropped From Online Radio Platform

The Blaze ^ | June 9, 2012 | Madeleine Morgenstern

[rightwingintelligentsia]

The 14-year-old radio host whose comments about gays ignited a firestorm this week has been dropped from the online radio platform Spreaker.

The page that was once the home to “The Caiden Cowger Program” now returns an error message saying the show is no longer available and has been deleted due to “offensive contents.”

In Cowger’s now-viral rant against homosexuality, the West Virginia teen called being gay a choice, not the way someone is born.

[SatinDoll]

Homosexuality is a personality disorder, or at least that is what it used to be labeled.

As to whether homosexuality is voluntary, essentially a “choice”, is questionable. The suicide rate among homosexuals and transgenders is high, indicating that many afflicted are not happy with themselves or their present situation. People do not usually choose to be miserable, and try to find a way to avoid misery.

It is a disorder that a person can correct, if willing. Many have done so.

[ransacked]

Hey, wait a minute. Thought we had freedom of speech in this country?

[Venturer]

The proof is in the pudding so they say.

The proof that it is a choice is in the fact that so many new recruits are being brought into the sickness, especially in the amount of women who have become willing to give it a try.Of course with women it is much easier to tryu , they dont have to worry about HIV nor do their rectums take the brunt of the penetration.

[Venturer]

We do have Freedom of speech, asn long as we don’ speak against Obama or his friends the homosexuals.

[vicar7]

When a society sanctions or looks the other way at less than the best behavior, they get more of that behavior and become less exceptional.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Three possibilities...

1. mental illness

2. birth defect

3. choice

[Hacksaw]

In Cowger’s now-viral rant against homosexuality, the West Virginia teen called being gay a choice, not the way someone is born.

I think it is arrested sexual development. That's why the homos try to recruit from the teen and pre teen crowd.

[Paisan]

I think it is arrested sexual development

A former pastor thought so too. If you can get to a kid when he is still in the “girls are icky” stage, you have a new recruit.

[Flavious_Maximus]

The FCC has gotten the kid removed. I tell you now that the homo Eric Holder, that's right, I said the HOMO Eric Holder is pressuring the FCC to have them crack down on any language that offends homosexuals.

Eric Holder and his ilk think they will be in power forever. The gay Mafia is going to get what's coming to them, in spades. You cannot supress the truth.

[cpa4you]

Yeah, don’t you just love your First Amendment rights in practice. Seems it might be in order to conduct a boycott of the advertisers. Now speaks like the real loss of money!

[fwdude]

This kid is especially despise by the Left because he doesn't follow the narrative that they've contrived, that young people are more accepting of the Leftist philosophy and will displace the conservative older generation, which they are ardently wishing would "die out."

It's the same with any conservative young person. They are marked.

[trebb]

This kid is especially despise by the Left because he doesn't follow the narrative that they've contrived, that young people are more accepting of the Leftist philosophy and will displace the conservative older generation, which they are ardently wishing would "die out." It's the same with any conservative young person. They are marked.

They just hate it when an example of failed brainwashing/indoctrination raises its moral head...

[sirchtruth]

I have a very hard time reading some of these comments intoning homosexuality is genetic. However, psychological make up can be genetic. Homosexuality is simply a CHOSEN behavior. Loving, liking or a sexual desire is an ACT. You chose it. All people have unnatural psychological "feelings." Being selfish, and choosing to act on depraved unnatural "feelings" is a danger which leads to turpitude.

Everyone is born with the propensity to LIE, STEAL, CHEAT etc...to act on these UNNATURAL, selfish feelings is perverse.

[IronJack]

I think it is arrested sexual development.

There's vastly more evidence to support that theory than there is indicating a genetic cause.

[BenLurkin]

Guess they aren’t interested in opposing viewpoints.

[Ocean_Living]

Ok time out...

Let's be clear here..

There is a canyon wide difference between attraction and action. Let's just be frigg'n clear about that. There's sex and then there's attraction.

You can be attracted to.... howler monkeys. But you're not a freak until you act on that attraction.

Homo-sex is a choice. Just like all sex acts are.

And just because they have an attraction doesn't mean they have to act on it.

Acting on those impulses is a weakness. A degraded selfish weakness. It's sick. Period.

[Norm Lenhart]

“Homo-sex is a choice. Just like all sex acts are. “

Exactly so. Take away the actual sex and what are gays? Two REALLY close friends. So if Politicians are legislating based on sex, why not all types of sex?

Ponder this. There are far more hetros taking part in BDSM than there are homosexuals having homosexual sex. Why does one type of sex warrant the golden political ticket while the other far more ‘popular’ type of sex get ignored? There is no logical way the GLBT crew can answer that question.

People taking part in BDSM can use every single argument that the Homo crowd uses to demand special ‘rights’, yet they do not. The same applies to any sexual ‘fetish’. People snicker when I say this but look at it logically. I’m totally serious.
Take away the actual sex and what are gays? Two REALLY close friends. “Feelings”? One can “Feel” any way they like. “WE can’t help who we love?” So? I love making music but I don’t get special rights because of it. So if Politicians are legislating based on sex, why not all types of sex?

[equaviator]

...”the show is no longer available and has been deleted due to “offensive contents.””

What’s the criteria for deletion due to “offensive contents”, a minimum of 3% of the people who viewed it or 3% of the content or both?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Glen ought to hire him.