Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Hoefling: "I will shut down every abortion facility in the country"
Tom Hoefling for President 2012 ^ | June 11, 2012 | Tom Hoefling

Posted on 06/11/2012 9:17:17 AM PDT by EternalVigilance

"All officers of government in this country, in every branch, at every level, have as the first obligation of their sacred oath the protection of all innocent lives within their jurisdiction.

Should I be elected to the office of President of the United States, I will keep my oath.

Justice Blackmun, in Roe vs. Wade, admitted that “of course” the child in the womb is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment, if they are a person.

Since it is self-evident that they are a person, my first act as President, after having sworn the oath, will be to publish a presidential finding to that effect.

My second act will be to ask for the resignation of anyone in the executive branch who will not act accordingly.

My third act will be to order the closing of every abortion facility in the country, as per the explicit, imperative requirement of the Supreme Law of the Land.

'No person shall be deprived of life without due process of law.'

'No State shall deprive any person of life without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.'”

-- Tom Hoefling


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: abortion; eternalvigilance; hoefling; thirdparty; tomhoefling
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 621-637 next last
To: kidd

Thanks for the encouraging words.

We’ve got until August to get 7500+ signatures in CT. It’s doable.


81 posted on 06/11/2012 10:54:53 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: allmendream
Your understanding of the Constitution and the limited and enumerated powers granted under it is obviously very limited.

No, EV understands the Constitution. It's just that the principles of the Constitution do not matter on things he wants to change but does matter on areas he wants to protect. People like him are dangerous.

82 posted on 06/11/2012 10:57:36 AM PDT by trailhkr1 (All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

What are the pictures next to the women??


83 posted on 06/11/2012 10:58:58 AM PDT by trailhkr1 (All you need to know about Zimmerman, innocent = riots, manslaughter = riots, guilty = riots)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: allmendream

The presidential finding in and of itself does nothing but clarify the chief executive’s understanding of the law.

Let me ask you a couple of questions:

1) Is the President required to take an oath to support the Constitution of the United States?

2) Does the Constitution of the United States imperatively require the equal protection of the right to life of every individual person?

3) Does the Constitution of the United States imperatively require every state to provide for the equal protection of the laws?

4) Is the child in the womb a person?


84 posted on 06/11/2012 11:02:06 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: so_real

...and if Obama wins???

Romney, whose base is the party of the Rs, which has many conservative members, HAS to listen, and list, more toward the conservative voice than Obama. Obama is completely unteathered from any conservative concept. Romney must, at the very least, pay lip service to conservative ideas.

I generally reject your “Great Conspiracy” theory. Notice, I am not mocking, I just don’t agree.


85 posted on 06/11/2012 11:02:38 AM PDT by GilesB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: trailhkr1
It's just that the principles of the Constitution do not matter on things he wants to change but does matter on areas he wants to protect.

Please point to the "constitutional principle" that excuses the president from his first duty, which is to protect the lives, the liberty, and the property of the people.

86 posted on 06/11/2012 11:04:47 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: trailhkr1

As another FReeper said, if you fear Obama vote for Romney. If you fear God, Don’t.


87 posted on 06/11/2012 11:04:47 AM PDT by Manic_Episode (Tom Hoefling for President - 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: marron

Glad you liked that. :-)

Thanks.


88 posted on 06/11/2012 11:09:20 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I'm curious. Have you ever run for a local or state elected office? That's usually how it's done, in order to build up the necessary name recognition before attempting something national.

or you can skip that step ... if you're billionaire or otherwise nationally famous ...

89 posted on 06/11/2012 11:18:35 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

And when your actions as president are Constitutionally challenged, do you expect Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito or Antonin Scalia to support you?


90 posted on 06/11/2012 11:20:51 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

My point was that Perot was not a conservative, as you say, you weren’t either, Perot was to the right of Romney of course, but he was no conservative.


91 posted on 06/11/2012 11:28:11 AM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Principled
If Romney gets in on an anti-Obama landslide, understand that before the year was out, ABO would be the dust of history and Romney's win would morph into a pro-Romney "mandate."

The "fire" that conservatives hope to be holding Romney's feet to, would have dwindled into dying embers crushed by the landslide "mandate."

92 posted on 06/11/2012 11:31:09 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

No, I have never held public office.

If that’s your criteria, rather than the restoration of the first moral, constitutional principles upon which our form of government and our claim to liberty are premised, you’ll have to choose someone else.

Thanks.


93 posted on 06/11/2012 11:33:57 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: ansel12

>>as you say, you weren’t either,<<

I was Pro-choice. Back when we were told that babies in the womb were blobs of tissue, when the only Ultrasound that was done on my sisters was the one for my nephew with birth defects and when it was hard to know who was right with little information and no internet. Lots of conservatives back then in my age group were Pro-Choice out of ignorance.

I was a fiscal conservative and Perot worked for lots of conservative.

That’s the point. Even my friend in Australia knew who he was. And he is the ONLY third party candidate since Teddy Roosevelt to make it.


94 posted on 06/11/2012 11:34:55 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Romney scares me. Obama is the freaking nightmare that is so bad you are afraid to go back to sleep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand

The president swears to support the Constitution, not to obey judges who issue immoral, unconstitutional opinions.


95 posted on 06/11/2012 11:35:34 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (The saving of the republic begins the day conservatives stop supporting what they say they hate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: driftdiver
A vote for anyone but the GOP candidate is a vote for Obama.

Then explain to a liberal how my third party vote in the presidential isn't a vote "for" Romney.

Because that person is labeling a vote for anyone but the Democrat candidate, as a vote for Romney.

96 posted on 06/11/2012 11:35:53 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Slump Tester
A vote for this guy is the same thing as voting for Obama.

Wrong. Patently, mathematically, wrong.

A vote for "this guy" is denying a vote to BOTH Romney and Obama and would be 100% neutral in influencing the outcome of O v R -- though it would weaken the "voter mandate" of either.

97 posted on 06/11/2012 11:39:38 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
"Welcome to "How gullible are you FR?"

Gullible enough to think conservatives would be able to hold a committed statist Republican's "feet to the fire" after his brand of "moderate progressive" politics won in a landslide?

98 posted on 06/11/2012 11:41:34 AM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
If that's your criteria ...

My 'criteria' is to evict the current Occupier_WH. In the 2008 POTUS election, over 129 million votes were cast. It is highly likely that the winner of the 2012 POTUS election will need over 65 million votes. Therefore, my criteria will, of necessity, include only someone who can obtain 65 million votes from the American public.

99 posted on 06/11/2012 11:45:28 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

After law enforcement officials, the courts and prosecutors on the state and federal levels all ignore your order, what do you do next?


100 posted on 06/11/2012 11:46:30 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 621-637 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson