Posted on 06/14/2012 2:15:38 PM PDT by massmike
A disturbing story is making its way out of a small community in Washington State, where residents are outraged over a school lesson that was delivered to fifth-grade children. During a sex education class led by the Onalaska Elementary School principal, graphic descriptions of oral and anal sex were purportedly delivered.
According to Fox News’ Todd Starnes, the 11-year-old students were being given a lesson on HIV-AIDS. However, the lesson took a bizarre turn when a student reportedly asked about other forms of sexual activity. At that point, the principal then delved into subjects many would deem too advanced for the children.
While the school hasn’t offered comment, Superintendent Scott Fenter defended the principal’s actions, claiming that she only gave “factual information” and “no demonstrations.“ Fenter also claims that the lessons that were offered came from ”state-adopted curriculum.”
“In reality, she stuck to the curriculum,” the district leader told Seattle’s Q-13 Fox News. “It’s pretty difficult to talk about STDs or sexually transmitted diseases without explaining what that is, or how it’s transmitted.”
Anal Sex should not be in an innocent child’s vocabulary. Only traumatized children would ever “know” about such a sick, unnatural idea.
A child’s worldview is warped-—their whole reality—when you teach them “mature adults” do such things. It is like pagan Greece-—when sodomizing boys was “good”. It was normal. They even had Zeus raping the beautiful boy, Ganymedes, in their myths-—and it was “normal”.
Ideas have consequences—that is why parents are designed to protect not only the bodies of their children, but their minds. Putting sick ideas into children, warps their reality—it creates Charles Manson who was sodomized when young. Warps their understanding of healthy relationships.
It took centuries to remove “sodomy and pederasty as “good”—for they have always gone together since it is a learned and cultured behavior.
Christianity removed the common practice from Western Civilization and developed the idea of “innocence” in childhood. It was a novel idea. They are trying to destroy God and bring back Satanic acts-—which included child sacrifice and orgies with children.
Know who wanted the innocence—respected until Sex Ed in the 70’s—of children removed-—the public schools. Why?
http://centurean2.wordpress.com/2010/12/16/radical-georg-lukacs_to-achieve-the-communist-utopia-lukacs-launched-a-graphical-radical-sex-education-program-promoting-free-love-and-promiscuity/
If you erase morality and sex-—which anal “sex” does-—you destroy the normal, natural sexual formation in children. It fixates them and focus on sex is unnatural during the latency period (6-12). They will be like the little boys in Afghanistan who think sodomy is fun and can’t wait to belong to a harem and have one when they grow up.
I repeat-—childhood needs to be kept innocent of such an intimate, powerful urge—until they have the experience and emotions to deal properly with the information—with maturity that children because of age never have. It just warps their perceptions of men and women and makes sex disgusting when they are at an age when it should be mysterious and awe-inspiring—since it is all about creating life. Anal “sex” destroys the morality and meaning of sex for children.
I remain unmoved, yet felt you deserved some sort of reply to your verbose, albeit continually recycled comment. Let’s just say that we (you and I) are done here. After all, it’s unlikely that the principal actually told the students that anal sex was as risky as it truly is, thus alleviating the conditions of my approval in the first place.
Understood—but you are devoid of any understanding of Freud and Rousseau and Christian Ethics concerning healthy childhood development. It was my major. All three noted for optimal emotional development the essential sexual innocence of children during latency period— 6-12. That means no “Sex Ed” which Lukacs designed-—a Marxist concept to sexualize children and destroy morality, particularly Christian Ethics.
Oh, you'd be surprised. I'm well versed in Freud, Piaget, Erikson, et al. Philosophers like Rousseau, admittedly to a much lesser degree, though not totally unfamiliar.
What separates you and I is that you're a Christian, and I am not. I thought I was for a long while, but deep down I knew that I really just couldn't believe. I was just assuaging my own mortal fears with what I believed at the time was faith. To this day, I actually envy Christians in that regard. I wish I could suspend my disbelief, but I cannot, and I know I cannot.
Well, that and you think that everything under the sun is the result of a Marxist plot, and I don't personally give Marxists near as much credit.
Really. My dad passed away and I miss him so...but when this crap comes up, I am no thankful he’s not here to see it. He would be heart sick that Americans have turned their children over to full blown, aggressive perverts.
If I were you, I would not even read these articles. You know enough about who is who and what is what in the never ending culture war. We are truly struggling with the dark side in America. And we are not winning.
Ha ha! Actually, Atheist plot —now pushed chiefly by Marxist “dialectic materialism”. There has been an effort, since the Enlightenment—Voltaire and others, to “Kill God”-—which culminated with the German Postmodernists in the 1800’s who eventually through Fabianism established themselves in all prominent Western Universities. It can be traced—the curricula is documented—starting before John Dewey and all his Socialist/Leftist friends—all involved with textbooks and Foundations and publishing companies.
People always wrestle with Faith. Atheism takes as much —if not more—”faith” than Christianity. Agnosticism is the only belief which can be based on no “Faith”. Science theories take as much or more “faith” than Christianity.
I was not always a Christian—I was an Atheist at times, but it made life pointless and really unhappy. Christianity is Joy. Truly.
This book really cleared up my thinking-—although other books by CS Lewis are tremendous. You might be interested in Abolition of Man also-—CS Lewis saw the destruction of Classical Education in England and predicted its current godless state which Theodore Dalrymple (psychiatrist) brilliantly describes in his essays
.
http://www.amazon.com/The-Question-God-Sigmund-Meaning/dp/074324785X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1339737680&sr=8-1&keywords=question+of+god
Sorry if I offended you again, but just trying to help. I always keep an open mind and love learning. All of my studying in the last 8 years has opened up an entirely new understanding of the world for me. I feel like the person who was able to crawl out of the cave in Plato’s Republic. :) When you return with all the knowledge you’ve collected, it really is frustrating trying to convince people that shadows are not what they seem. In fact, you can’t convince them. Their reality is what they see.
I’m not an atheist. I would agree that something from nothing is the ultimate expression of faith. I hesitate to use the term agnostic, because it implies that I would be open to all possibilities, and I am not. I’m more of the opinion that human understanding is limited, it was always limited and it will always be limited. I’m comfortable with some things simply being beyond my ability to comprehend.
I would wholeheartedly agree with you. Human understanding is limited and always will be limited. But the 19th and 20th Century belief being forced in US schools and law, that Faith and Reason can be separated, is bizarre and not possible. It is the irrationality of—dare I say it-—Marxism.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.