Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney woos Christian conservatives, gets Santorum support
MSNBC ^ | June 16, 2012 | NBC News

Posted on 06/16/2012 9:17:46 PM PDT by Innovative

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

1 posted on 06/16/2012 9:17:58 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Get back to me when he commits to re-instating “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”.

Right now he is on record as leaving things as they are with DADT.

Until that time, he is simply pandering to me and other conservative Christians.


2 posted on 06/16/2012 9:20:02 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
.


This "news article" is the type of Journalist Garbage that was once referred to as "Stalinist Propaganda" ...








.
3 posted on 06/16/2012 9:23:03 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will DEFEAT the Obama-Romney Socialist Gay-Marriage Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Did you notice that Santorum is now actively supporting Romney?

“The former Pennsylvania senator urged the audience to help Romney win.”


4 posted on 06/16/2012 9:24:01 PM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Patton@Bastogne

It’s not propaganda — Santorum IS campaigning for Romney and is urging conservatives to vote for Romney.


5 posted on 06/16/2012 9:27:51 PM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Whatevuh. I’m SO SICK of being USED as a ‘special interest group’ just like the Demo-cruds do. Everything is ‘pigeon-holed’. ENOUGH, already. Be for “life....liberty....and the pursuit of happiness”.


6 posted on 06/16/2012 9:28:42 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Wings cannot be redistributed, they can only be broken. ~ Oleg Atbashian (People's Cube))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“Did you notice that Santorum is now actively supporting Romney?”

Maybe he doesn’t want 4 more years of Obama?


7 posted on 06/16/2012 9:29:31 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sun

“Did you notice that Santorum is now actively supporting Romney?”

“Maybe he doesn’t want 4 more years of Obama?”

Precisely!


8 posted on 06/16/2012 9:31:38 PM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

He is looking to 2016 or 2024. He has to to do this. It means NOTHING.

It doesn’t mean that Romney is trustworthy.


9 posted on 06/16/2012 9:32:44 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I am going to vomit.


10 posted on 06/16/2012 9:33:34 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative
Did you notice that Santorum is now actively supporting Romney?

So?

What does that have to do with Mitt Romney refusing to re-instate DADT?

What does that have to do with the documented history of serial lying by Mitt Romney?

What does that have to do with Mitt Romney's lying, left-wing, Progressive Liberal record, as documented here on FreeRepublic?
11 posted on 06/16/2012 9:35:03 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: svcw

You’ll do more than vomit if zero wins another 4 years.


12 posted on 06/16/2012 9:36:36 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

I have yet to learn what it is that mittens has to offer for conservatives in his agenda. He can claim he’s better than Obama, but I have not been promised any thing on him planning to protect the constitution at all.

I have not heard how he will restore the constitution or any part of it to the people. Will he dump agenda 21 or will he keep business as usual on the UN front. Does he believe in the global warming agenda or will he defund them and cut them off. Will he limit DHS to naming only Islamists as domestic terrorists and make they stop naming Americans as terrorists. Will he appoint constitutionalists to the courts. Will he dump corporate welfare. Will he respect the tenth amendment. Will he protect human life from the ravishes of his progressive pals. Will he protect the right to self defense. Will he protect the borders and give everyone equal rights. Will he go after Democrats when they violate the constitution and break the law. What does he think of nanny Bloomberg.

He’s go a leftist track record in mass. and says he only did that to make those communists happy. Well...that is all I know about him.


13 posted on 06/16/2012 9:44:11 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

“Precisely!”

:)

It’s not rocket science.


14 posted on 06/16/2012 9:51:39 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Innovative


"...who, being themselves but fallible and uninspired men, have assumed dominion over the faith of others, setting up their own opinions and modes of thinking as the only true and infallible, and as such endeavoring to impose them on others, hath established and maintained false religions over the greatest part of the world, and through all time;
 
...
 
 that it is time enough for the rightful purposes of civil government, for its officers to interfere when principles break out into overt acts against peace and good order; and finally, that truth is great and will prevail if left to herself, that she is the proper and sufficient antagonist to error, and has nothing to fear from the conflict, unless by human interposition disarmed of her natural weapons, free argument and debate, errors ceasing to be dangerous when it is permitted freely to contradict them. "
 
"I HAVE SWORN UPON THE ALTAR OF GOD ETERNAL HOSTILITY TO EVERY FORM OF TYRANNY OVER THE MIND OF MAN"
--The Virginia Act For Establishing Religious Freedom
--Thomas Jefferson, 1786
 

15 posted on 06/16/2012 9:56:19 PM PDT by OldEarlGray (The POTUS is FUBAR until the White Hut is sanitized with American Tea)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

None other than Senator Paul is ALSO supporting Willard now.


16 posted on 06/16/2012 10:03:59 PM PDT by Republican1795.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Any support he gets from Christian conservatives is very grudging and reluctant.


17 posted on 06/16/2012 10:09:05 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Obama and Company lied, the American economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued

Mittens is just a tad better than Obama.

I’m not holding my breath waiting for him to be the next Ronald Reagan.

His record leaves a lot to be desired.

“Verify, then trust.” Mittens has to work to earn conservative support.


18 posted on 06/16/2012 10:43:58 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs; Innovative

Santorum always endorses the most left candidate available.

Specter when he can and Romney when he doesn’t have Specter.

Santorum was an enthusiastic Romney endorser in 2008.


19 posted on 06/16/2012 10:45:10 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ansel12; Innovative
RE:”Santorum always endorses the most left candidate available

In this case that would be Obama. This is meaningless.

I am well aware of RS’s history as Senator and it is nothing I would support.

20 posted on 06/16/2012 11:02:22 PM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Of course I meant the most liberal republican available.

Santorum thought that Reagan was a bit of a right wing extremist, but Santorum was still supporting liberal republicans at the time.

Santorum, like Romney, switched to pro-life to run for office in 1990, in 1996, Santorum was endorsing removing pro-life from the GOP platform.


21 posted on 06/16/2012 11:19:00 PM PDT by ansel12 (Massachusetts Governors, where the GOP now goes for it's Presidential candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sun

“Maybe he doesn’t want 4 more years of Obama?”

But after 4 years of Romney, will we want 4 more years?


22 posted on 06/16/2012 11:30:55 PM PDT by ari-freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

The only, and I do mean only, reason I am considering voting for him is the simple fact that he ain’t Obama. Another wasted opportunity. I don’t know who chokes more, the GOP or LeBron James.

Way to go, GOP-E. Way to freakin’ go.


23 posted on 06/17/2012 12:42:49 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:58:59......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

For the record, I voted for Santorum in the Texas Primary last month when Romney was the only candidate still in the race.

Texas was late in the cycle in 2008 as well, Alan Keyes got my vote then over Romney-McCain-Huckabeeyeeyeeyeeeee.


24 posted on 06/17/2012 1:17:59 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (The media ignored the 40th anniversary of Bill Ayers' Pentagon bombing but not Watergate. Ask Why.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Newt Gringrich supports and is campaigning for Romney as well.
Has Santorum campaigned side by side with Romney yet? That would be a mistake after all the slimely campaign tactics Romney used against him in the Primaries.


25 posted on 06/17/2012 1:37:21 AM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SaraJohnson
I have yet to learn what it is that mittens has to offer for conservatives in his agenda. He can claim he’s better than Obama, but I have not been promised any thing on him planning to protect the constitution at all. I have not heard how he will restore the constitution or any part of it to the people. Will he dump agenda 21 or will he keep business as usual on the UN front. Does he believe in the global warming agenda or will he defund them and cut them off. Will he limit DHS to naming only Islamists as domestic terrorists and make they stop naming Americans as terrorists. Will he appoint constitutionalists to the courts. Will he dump corporate welfare. Will he respect the tenth amendment. Will he protect human life from the ravishes of his progressive pals. Will he protect the right to self defense. Will he protect the borders and give everyone equal rights. Will he go after Democrats when they violate the constitution and break the law. What does he think of nanny Bloomberg. He’s go a leftist track record in mass. and says he only did that to make those communists happy. Well...that is all I know about him.

And what do you know about Obama?

26 posted on 06/17/2012 3:37:39 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: trebb

The anger that I see on this website truly amazes me.


27 posted on 06/17/2012 3:46:38 AM PDT by gortklattu (God knows who is best, everybody else is making guesses - Tony Snow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
Santorum is tight with the Vichy Republicans and does what he's told, like when he took several weeks off to "file his taxes" just when he was scoring big against Bishop Romney.

He'll get a nice fat client list or be the VP in return for his showing that he's a solid Vichy Curr and willing to do exactly the same thing he did during the entire time he was in office which is to go along to get along.

28 posted on 06/17/2012 3:51:36 AM PDT by Rashputin (Only Newt can defeat both the Fascist democrats and the Vichy GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu
The anger that I see on this website truly amazes me.

Yep - Obama's term in the WH and his actions have deranged a lot of folks. I think it's more fear for the Nation and a sense of helplessness driving most of it - they want the best so bad they won't settle for the least-damaging. They seem to be more intent on destroying Obama's competitor and ensuring the worst happens and our Nation is finally taken away. Almost like a person disposing of all his possessions before committing suicide - born of despair and seems to make sense at the time....

29 posted on 06/17/2012 3:58:51 AM PDT by trebb ("If a man will not work, he should not eat" From 2 Thes 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

The anger towards Romney is what amazes me. Definitely not my first choice, but clearly now the only choice. I went to his web site and his current positions are in line with most of what FR folks believe. Yes, I know he’s changed positions before, but this is now and his positions are quite public. Two very important things, in my mind, to consider. Supreme court justices. Yes, I know his history in Massachusetts. My guess is he picked them based on who he could get through the nominating process. Also, our brave men and women in the military. Who truly cares more about our country and our military more? Obama or Romney? This country has taken a big hit to the gut. I don’t think it can take one to the groin (another 4 years of Obama).


30 posted on 06/17/2012 4:04:01 AM PDT by TheRake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
"It [Santorum's support] doesn’t mean that Romney is trustworthy."

Maybe not, but it certainly means that Santorum trusts Romney to follow the platform that Romney has outlined. This includes: Kill Obamacare, support Right to Life, low tax rates, less government, less regulation, and more freedom. I agree with Rick, and I'll vote for that any day, too.

31 posted on 06/17/2012 4:27:40 AM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus
You’ll do more than vomit if zero wins another 4 years.

Absolutely right. Romney is not the perfect conservative
candidate, but probably none of us are either. We had best
take the medicine this time and not complain (at least too loud). Four more years of Obama and there will not be another
chance to take any medicine. Personal freedoms will be history.
32 posted on 06/17/2012 5:36:39 AM PDT by bytesmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

None of these people stand on principles! Santorum has to support Romney so if/when he gets elected he doesn’t get left out in the cold when he tries to get his agenda accomplished. Its all nothing more than kissing ass with these people. Politicians are disgusting, they grovel in anything that gets them what they want. Let’s not act surprised and shocked when supposed conservatives stand behind people like Mittens. Politicians are in it for the money and the power. Not a single one of them gives a flying F about John Q Citizen.


33 posted on 06/17/2012 5:37:48 AM PDT by eak3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheRake

It’s the “burn down the village to save it” syndrome. Many here truly WANT another 4 years of Obama, with the totally deluded thinking, that after Obama totally destroys the US as we know it, then people will be more likely to vote for a “super-conservative” candidate. What they don’t realize is that after they allow and cheerfully watch the village burning, all that will be left is ashes. After Obama puts in more socialists in the Courts, including the Supreme Court, implements the communist healthcare and a few other programs in his next term, when he doesn’t even have to pretend, it will be pretty much impossible to go back.

Some have this notion that a Republican Congress can stop him, but just look at his record of governing by executive orders.

Anyone with two brain cells to rub together should be able to see that the only way to save the Republic is to get out and vote for Romney and Republicans in Congress. Obama must not be given another 4 years.


34 posted on 06/17/2012 7:24:41 AM PDT by Innovative (None are so blind that will not see.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: gortklattu

“The anger that I see on this website truly amazes me.”

I second that, presuming it means anger over Romney. I personally don’t like the guy myself, especially being a MA RINO.

Maybe another RINO president will continue the nations slow slide to the gutter. But another term of Obama I’m very convinced will mean a quick flush down the toilet of our Constitution/Republic replaced by a Stalin dictator style government.

Obama has already given a good preview by sidestepping congress and the Constitution with his recent illegals exec order. If the voters allow him to get by with this, he will know he can do it anytime he wants.

I really think the economy will improve with Romney. Conservatives & Tea Party’ers need to keep hammering at this guy and the RINO party to keep them in line.

This anger is almost as destructive as Obama himself as not voting at all represents a vote for Obama and the end to our freedoms. I see a vote for Romney as another chance to get the country back before it’s too late.


35 posted on 06/17/2012 7:25:49 AM PDT by redfreedom (Just a simpleton enjoying the freedoms a fly-over/red state has to offer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Get back to me when he commits to re-instating “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”.

Which of any of the Republican candidates made a commitment to this? Sorry, but that genie is out of the bottle and no Republican who seriously wants to win an election is going to expend the overwhelming amount of political capital trying to put it back in.

36 posted on 06/17/2012 8:05:45 AM PDT by Drew68 (I WILL vote to defeat Barack Hussein Obama!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: norwaypinesavage
RE :”Maybe not, but it certainly means that Santorum trusts Romney to follow the platform that Romney has outlined. This includes: Kill Obamacare, support Right to Life, low tax rates, less government, less regulation, and more freedom. I agree with Rick, and I'll vote for that any day, to

RS is pimping Romney because he is looking to 2016 or 2024. RS already clearly said just a few months ago that Romney would be worse than Obama.

I saw Romney on CBS today saying he wouldn't rescind Obama’s executive order on amnesty and he would replace it with a sweeping amnesty bill. Now having lied his way to the nomination Romney is running to the left.

McCain was on NBC saying the same thing, that Obama's action is a half measure and should be replaced with a full amnesty bill.

Work visas to illegals with high unemployment is stupid.

Liberal Republican Romney, Romney is a liberal.

37 posted on 06/17/2012 10:04:10 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is a liberal. Just watch him closely try to screw us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

I don’t know who chokes more, the GOP or LeBron James.

>Way to go, GOP-E. Way to freakin’ go.

I understand your frustration, but it is misdirected.
Mitt may be the current standard bearer for the GOP E, but they did not nominate him.
The voters did, and that is a fact.


38 posted on 06/17/2012 10:48:29 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

I know. It’s me just going through my stages of grief....sigh....


39 posted on 06/17/2012 11:04:07 AM PDT by Absolutely Nobama (The Doomsday Clock is at 11:58:59......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Absolutely Nobama

>me just going through my stages of grief....sigh...

You and me both brother.


40 posted on 06/17/2012 11:20:48 AM PDT by bill1952 (Choice is an illusion created between those with power - and those without)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
"Any support he gets from Christian conservatives is very grudging and reluctant".

Absolutely.

41 posted on 06/17/2012 4:13:57 PM PDT by NoRedTape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bill1952
Mitt may be the current standard bearer for the GOP E, but they did not nominate him.

Bull. They manipulated the caucus reporting in Iowa. They manipulated rules in Virginia (at least) to eliminate competition. They endorsed, or financed for all I know, the Obamney's slash and burn primary campaign. Now they want me to enthusiastically support this libtard Masshole? Keep wishing.

42 posted on 06/17/2012 4:37:13 PM PDT by j_tull (Massachusetts once lead the American Revolution. Under Mitt Romney, it lead the demise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

How is four years of, either, Obama, or Romney healthy for the long-term future of U.S. conservatism? The only major political candidates left for ‘12 POTUS are, both, leftists, and the U.S. is in for some more, major “hurting”, with either one as POTUS! Mitt’s ego is way too big to listen to and then, actually, act upon all that conservatives, really, want Mitt to do as POTUS, and having conservatives attempt to “hold Mitt’s feet to the fire”, in order to make Mitt into a, truly, conservative POTUS won’t work. The U.S. will become a third world, socialistic country, soon enough, unfortunately, but, please prove me wrong.


43 posted on 06/17/2012 4:51:07 PM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (The world continues to be stuck in a "all leftist, all of the time" funk. BUNK THE FUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sun

Still making excuses for the snake in the grass, st rick, the LIAR, the deceiver? Satan is the master of liars/deceivers. It was obvious who rick serves way back!

He wanted Romney all along - since ‘07 - and he deliberately drew in easily deceived voters. And his idiot voters where too prideful to take warning even though IT WAS OBVIOUS - his supporters are truly the most clueless easily deceived type of voters. Putty in the hands of evil.

Believing a KNOWN LYING politician - the bottom of the class idiots - unteachable! They are the laughing stock of the snakes in the grass, rick and mitt, but they still need his suckers. After all it’s rick supporters fault that LIBERAL baby killing same sex marriage Romney is the one left standing. He wants his supporters to bow to evil one more time, finish the job, so they will be tainted forever with voting evil to the core godless romney.


44 posted on 06/17/2012 5:23:48 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear

Those who believe or supported the know LIAR St. Rick are not special! They are merely useable for their stupidity!


45 posted on 06/17/2012 5:27:11 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
He is looking to 2016 or 2024. He has to to do this. It means NOTHING.

What was he looking to - in 07/08 when he did the same thing - campaigning and trying to convince voters mitt was conservative. Rick is a POS and lied his 'religious' ass off about Newt, a proven patriot. Satan is the master of lies, and that is who rick has served during the campaign in 08 and once you sold your soul, he owns you so rick Had to do it again in '12. He is still useable for evil's agenda.

It doesn’t mean that Romney is trustworthy.

IT MEANS RICK ISN'T TRUSTWORTHY - He has been in mitt's pocket all along - he needs a meal ticket and will bow to evil anytime, anyday for it. And he's deceive voters - that's a cake walk for rick and he proved it. Enjoy it now rick, eternity is forever.

46 posted on 06/17/2012 5:45:57 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
He is looking to 2016 or 2024. He has to to do this. It means NOTHING.

Does it mean Santorum is trustworthy?

47 posted on 06/17/2012 5:46:18 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs
"he [Romney] would replace it with a sweeping amnesty bill.If you want to have a discussion with me, you have to start by telling the truth. Romney has never said he wants a "sweeping amnesty" bill. He wants an immigration bill that starts with closing the borders. The vast majority of real conservatives agree with that.
48 posted on 06/17/2012 5:53:26 PM PDT by norwaypinesavage (Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Mittens has to work to earn conservative support.

How so naive of you! Work at what? Repeal his socialistic Romneycare with it's abortion, repeal HIS same sex marriage he instituted, VOID the same sex marriages he, PERSONALLY, performed?

Ignorance is bliss - what a comfy hole in the ground some have creating for themselves to feel better.

49 posted on 06/17/2012 5:59:14 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: eak3
Not a single one of them gives a flying F about John Q Citizen.

There was ONLY ONE 'WeThePeople' candidate and that was NEWT. You remember, the ONE who Rick and Mitt lied their evil ass off about - yet the ONLY ONE with proven credentials as doing FOR America! FURS, FUMR.

50 posted on 06/17/2012 6:03:53 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson