Posted on 06/20/2012 2:58:24 AM PDT by Libloather
Axelrod, Obama, Holder are thinking -—”How do we spin this as racist? And which of our media stooges will help us do it?”
Holders intent was to support the propaganda meme that guns used in Mexico were being purchased in the USA.
This fact was disproved by independent work of the National rifle Association, and it was established cl;early for all to see that “Fast and Furious” were a means to impose increased federal gun control on Red States like Arizona.In Obamas opinion, too many Americans cling bitterly to their bibles and guns.Obama has acted to remove the bible from civil society, and has acted to diminish 2nd amendment rights by refusing to enforce US laws and creating false
information based on his own policy conduct, designed to axchieve an idological end.
This is treasonous conduct. Both Holder and Obama need to go.
Too late.
Chrissy Tingle-leg already played the race card last night on Hardhead.
“Issa also called on President Obama to press Holder “to be more cooperative.””
That’s some nice finger-pointing, Issa. Don’t stop there!
I think “they” are hoping and praying for a prosecution event before the election. It seems that they’re goading Issa, et al., into going forward with it. It’ll distract from the economy/jobs. It’ll distract from Obama’s legitimacy. And it’ll make the GOP look like petty idiots as in the Clinton impeachment. Even though gun walking and the death of an American is stunningly more important than perjury and a blue dress with love ick on it, the MSM knows how to spin a story. Contempt hearings will be a dream come true for them.
Holder is trying to hide something really big, maybe a trail to the White House.
It’s a “physician, heal thyself” moment (Holder, prosecute yourself). High tragecomedy.
Does a contempt of Congress vote have any consequences or is it more a vote of no confidence?
“Holder is trying to hide something pretty big”
I’m pretty sure he has had plenty of time to destroy any incriminating evidence against the One and himself AND Hillary, who I suspect was behind this all the time. I remember her tirades back then about American guns being bought by drug cartels. All crocked as a barrel of fishhooks. It’s going to embariss Issa and Boner when there is NO incriminating evidence to be found. I hope I am wrong and they all go to prison for high crimes and misdemeanors!
INHERENT CONTEMPT
Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation).
Concerned with the time-consuming nature of a contempt proceeding and the inability to extend punishment further than the session of the Congress concerned (under Supreme Court rulings), Congress created a statutory process in 1857. While Congress retains its “inherent contempt” authority and may exercise it at any time, this inherent contempt process was last used by the Senate in 1934, in a Senate investigation of airlines and the U.S. Postmaster.
STATUTORY PROCEEDINGS
“This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. Such statements should be clarified or removed. (July 2008)”
Following a contempt citation, the presiding officer of the chamber is instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia;[9] according to the law it is the “duty” of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury for action.
The criminal offense of “contempt of Congress” sets the penalty at not less than one month nor more than twelve months in jail and a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000.[10]
While the law pronounces the duty of the U.S. Attorney is to impanel a grand jury for its action on the matter, some proponents of the unitary executive theory believe that the Congress cannot properly compel the U.S. Attorney to take this action against the Executive Branch, asserting that the U.S. Attorney is a member of the Executive Branch who ultimately reports only to the President and that compelling the Attorney amounts to compelling the President himself. They believe that to allow Congress to force the President to take action against a subordinate following his directives would be a violation of the separation of powers and infringe on the power of the Executive branch. The legal basis for this belief, they contend, can be found in Federalist 49, in which James Madison wrote ““The several departments being perfectly co-ordinate by the terms of their common commission, none of them, it is evident, can pretend to an exclusive or superior right of settling the boundaries between their respective powers.” This approach to government is commonly known as “departmentalism” or “coordinate construction”[citation needed]
CIVIL PROCEDURES
Senate Rules authorize the Senate to direct the Senate Legal Counsel to file a civil action against any private individual found in contempt.
Upon motion by the Senate, the federal district court issues another order for a person to comply with Senate process. If the subject then refuses to comply with the Court's order, the person may be cited for contempt of court and may incur sanctions imposed by the Court. The process has been used at least six times; but the civil procedure can only be used against Executive branch officials “in certain limited circumstances.”[citation needed]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contempt_of_Congress
Do we really think Holder will send Holder before the Grand Jury?
Contempt hearings will be a dream come true for them...
I’d take that challenge in a second and turn it into a nightmare.
This is big time criminal activity by folks that really do believe that it is not, because somehow they are empowered to ignore established criminal law...
We could tack them to the wall - nothing about F&F is even remotely legal & the stonewalling screams cover up.
Yes, who will be the one chosen to say, "If Holder were white, would Issa and the Republicans be attacking him?"
I read that the man who will ultimately handle the prosecution of Holder (if the House moves it forward) actually WORKS for Holder.
Not to mention that the penalty is something like a $1000 fine...
Personally this just looks like politics to me. The Republican House should be doing other things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.