Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

90 B61 nuclear bombs at Incirlik Air Base in Turkey (2009)
Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists ^ | 23 NOVEMBER 2009 | ALEXANDRA BELL AND BENJAMIN LOEHRKE

Posted on 06/23/2012 5:20:03 AM PDT by moonshot925

Today, Turkey hosts an estimated 90 B61 gravity bombs at Incirlik Air Base. Fifty of these bombs are reportedly assigned for delivery by U.S. pilots, and forty are assigned for delivery by the Turkish Air Force. However, no permanent nuclear-capable U.S. fighter wing is based at Incirlik, and the Turkish Air Force is reportedly not certified for NATO nuclear missions, meaning nuclear-capable F-16s from other U.S. bases would need to be brought in if Turkey's bombs were ever needed.

(Excerpt) Read more at thebulletin.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nuclear; syria; turkey; weapons
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: knarf

Replaceable Limited Life Components or LLC.


21 posted on 06/23/2012 6:40:01 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

There’s been nukes in Turkey since the Kennedy Administration.


22 posted on 06/23/2012 6:46:24 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

When I was in the Army, the Luftwaffe had a Pershing battalion stationed in Holland, just across the German border, with an American ordance unit having physical custody of the warheads. The warheads were rigged with demolition charges that were to be used if there was any chance that the U.S. would lose control of warheads, unless, of cource, command channels released them. The idea was that the Russians would be a whole lot less likely to attack Germany with nuclear weapons in the event of war in Europe if the Germans had control of 36 Pershing launchers, and at least that many rounds.


23 posted on 06/23/2012 6:50:00 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The Democratic Party strongly supports full civil rights for necro-Americans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925
Good morning. The article's dateline is 2009. Still interesting, because I spent over a year in TU at TUSLOG Det 67 back in the mid 1970's. We just started to deactivate the Honest Johns...boy, I'm getting old.

5.56mm

24 posted on 06/23/2012 6:55:37 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ibytoohi
(Muslim Brotherhood etc)

They don't have the balls or the means to take any fully functional tactical nukes in Turkey. Plenty of safeguards would prevent that from happening.

25 posted on 06/23/2012 6:56:09 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
There’s been nukes in Turkey since the Kennedy Administration.

You are absolutely right on that. I know because I loaded them at Incirlik in the late 1960,s as part of a 30 day TDY attachment shared by three F-100D Squadrons. Had 18 months total time at Incirlik The Mk61 (B designation came after I was out), was introduced to us in 1969.

26 posted on 06/23/2012 6:58:20 AM PDT by Wilum (Never loaded a nuke I didn't like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
There’s been nukes in Turkey since the Kennedy Administration

But in 1960, the legacy of Ataturk meant that Turkey was still secular and not dominated by Muslim fanatics, a movement that was just getting started then.

Turkey is now 99% Muslim and Erdogan has systematically dismembered religious pluralism guarded by the Turkish military.

Turkey should be evicted from NATO and seen for what it now is: a country descending into Muslim madness, a place that will regress to the barbarism and stone age crudity that all of the Arab middle east is becoming.

They should have no access to any American weapons, especially nuclear weapons.

27 posted on 06/23/2012 7:01:35 AM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe

I think we chatted before; TUSLOG DET 165 67-70


28 posted on 06/23/2012 7:02:58 AM PDT by Wilum (Never loaded a nuke I didn't like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; All

Never underestimate a determined enemy.


29 posted on 06/23/2012 7:02:58 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1250 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup

When I walked around at Incirllik in 1967 in the area that had the nukes, carrying an M-16 and 5 mags, surrounded by a chain link fence, there was only 1 SAT team patroling the entire base. Don’t know if security has been beefed up today.


30 posted on 06/23/2012 7:03:16 AM PDT by NostraDanUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

WHAT ABOUT SYRIA?
Syria is not among the allies listed in the Russian led invasion of Israel. Syria is probably one of Russia’s favorite allies, at least in a geographical sense. Syria is known as a training ground for terrorists. It is believed to be the base of operations for a number of terrorist organizations, including al-Qaeda, Hamas, and the Hezbollah. Syria is directly linked to Iran, Russia, and Iraq.

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) were never found in Iraq, but not because they did not exist. They were smuggled out of Iraq and into Syria. Satellite pictures showed them being transported to Syria, smuggled out by fifty-six commercial planes with the seats removed. The claim by Iraq was that they were “planes of relief to Syria for a tragedy,” but in actuality, they were Weapons of Mass Destruction. [See The Last Generation: Prophecy, Current World Events, and the End Times for more detailed information, including the sources of this information and their credibility.]

The big question is, “Why isn’t Syria included among the allies in the Russian-led Muslim/Confederacy invasion? The most likely answer is found in the Bible. It concerns a prophecy about the destruction of Damascus [Syria].

The Demise of Damascus [Syria]

“… Behold, Damascus is about to be removed from being a city and will become a fallen ruin … The fortified city will disappear from Ephraim …” (Isaiah 17:1-3).

The city of Damascus is the capital of Syria and is “reputed to be the oldest continuously existing city in the world.” It has been conquered by other countries but never destroyed. As a result, we know that this prophecy has not been fulfilled.

Because of the total devastation described in Isaiah 17, the destruction will probably be nuclear. The most likely country to destroy Damascus is Israel. Damascus would likely use WMDs or a dirty bomb against Israel. Israel’s leaders have already stated that they would react with a nuclear bomb. This could happen any day. We don’t know the timing of this event, but we can assume that it is prior to the Russian invasion. Otherwise, Syria would likely be allied with Russia.

http://focalpointpublications.com/ArticleRussia1/ArticleRussia1.html

Could it be that Damascus is destroyed by American backed rebels, not Israel? If it is true Syria is not an ally of Russia in the Bible, then Assad must fall. Or will we see Russia back Syria for a time, but when they see they are going to lose...use the old tactic of slash and burn during retreat? If Chapter 17 is the prophecy, then Israel will destroy Syria...we just have not seen full reason for that action. The fall of Assad and the takeover by terrorists with WMD would be a trigger for Israel to act though.

Go read the entire Chapter 17. God is often known for irony...Look at verses 12-14 too. United Nations anyone?

So why does Russia get involved? Russia is protecting Assad? No, not quite. Obama and Putin are to do what with nuclear arms after the election? Russia doesn’t have them in Russia. America is but a fool...all that stuff is with Russia’s middle east allies. Russia has a vested interest in protecting Assad from this discovery. But, Russia cannot afford to have those weapons fall into the hands of the rebels either.

God’s plan will come into play and Syria will be but a remnant...


31 posted on 06/23/2012 7:07:07 AM PDT by EBH (Obama took away your American Dreams and replaced them with "Dreams from My (his) Father".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Never underestimate a determined enemy.

I have working knowledge of many of the safeguards. Naaw, the US not going to lose control of them.

32 posted on 06/23/2012 7:07:39 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Didn’t the novel “Alas Babylon” open up with a shoot down over Syria?


33 posted on 06/23/2012 7:11:42 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Didn’t the novel “Alas Babylon” open up with a shoot down over Syria?


34 posted on 06/23/2012 7:11:56 AM PDT by Sirius Lee (Goode over evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wilum
Good morning. We have spoken before reference TU. I can't remember the topic, but then again we have been on this forum quite a number of years.

Have you been back to Turkey since? Closest I came was Greece in the 1980's.

5.56mm

35 posted on 06/23/2012 7:13:42 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee; Alas Babylon!
Didn’t the novel “Alas Babylon” open up with a shoot down over Syria?

Dunno, let's ping him.

36 posted on 06/23/2012 7:19:58 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1250 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
I have working knowledge of many of the safeguards. Naaw, the US not going to lose control of them.

I sure hope you're right.

37 posted on 06/23/2012 7:22:27 AM PDT by null and void (Day 1250 of our ObamaVacation from reality - Obama is not a Big Brother [he's a Big Sissy...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: NostraDanUS
When I walked around at Incirllik in 1967 in the area that had the nukes,

We probably crossed paths several times, I loaded them.

38 posted on 06/23/2012 7:22:37 AM PDT by Wilum (Never loaded a nuke I didn't like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Turkey doesn’t have nuclear arms. We have nuclear arms in Turkey.


39 posted on 06/23/2012 7:24:04 AM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: moonshot925
If nuclear capable US planes have to be brought in to deliver these nukes what is the value of having them stored there? I was also under the impression that only US forces were authorized to deliver US nukes and find it kind of scary that there is at least a scenario for non US forces to use them.
40 posted on 06/23/2012 7:25:44 AM PDT by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson