Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TonyInOhio

I understood they sent that provision back to the lower court for reconsideration.


2 posted on 06/25/2012 7:53:58 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

Same thing they did here in 2000 Bush/Gore debacle. Same difference.


27 posted on 06/25/2012 8:21:46 AM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

I understood they sent that provision back to the lower court for reconsideration.


Yup. They didn’t uphold it. They just punted on it. So there is nothing in this ruling for us to cheer.


45 posted on 06/25/2012 8:39:21 AM PDT by chessplayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

Nah, they just refused to address it, while offering some guidelines in the event it’s litigated.


59 posted on 06/25/2012 8:51:36 AM PDT by ArmstedFragg (hoaxy dopey changey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson