Posted on 06/25/2012 10:14:48 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
A Boy Scouts of America national board member, James Turley, who is also global chairman and CEO of the accounting firm Ernst & Young, recently said he “will work from within to seek a change” to overturn the BSA policy that bans gay scouts and leaders. But is Turley working on his own initiative, or has the White House prodded him with perks and favors?
Is it a coincidence that Turley came out swinging against the BSA’s century-old policy to ban gays from leadership and that he has such close affiliations with the pro-gay Obama administration?
Is it a coincidence that Turley was nominated to President Barack Obama’s Export Council in 2010?
Is it a coincidence Turley was granted a seat on an investment advisory panel which met with none other than Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Oct. 17, 2011?
Is it a coincidence that Turley has been a global cheerleader for Obama’s economic strategies and an economic-ambassador-of-sorts to other mogul business leaders, as clearly seen in his Bloomberg media interview from the 2011 economic summit in Davos, Switzerland?
Is it a coincidence that the former assistant secretary for tax policy at the U.S. Treasury from 2009 to 2011, Michael Mundaca, who advised Treasury Secretary Geithner on all matters relating to taxation, recently joined the team of Ernst & Young?
Is it a coincidence that, as the White House website explained, “Ernst & Young LLP will honor [the Obama administration's Network for Teaching Entrepreneurship's] youth entrepreneurs at regional Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of The Year Award galas across the country, bringing important attention to the next generation of young entrepreneurs”?
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
This country is on the fast track to a Sodom and Gomorrah endgame. There seem to be no safe havens for kids anymore.
Here’s a question for you and all -— Are Pedophiles classified as subsets of homosexuals? or are they a separate category on their own?
There are homosexuals who are not pedophiles, but are there pedophiles who are not homosexuals?
RE: Did I just hear champagne corks popping at NAMBLA headquarters?
Is this organization LEGAL?
If this happens, you keep your children and grandchildren OUT of the scouts. Don’t let them join. Soon the scouts will be irrelevant. Get together with like minded parents and form your own groups. We can overcome the liberal assault on our children. We have to start thinking like them.
The darkside's objective is not about creating opportunities for those who don't want to live by traditional values... it's about perverting the organizations themselves. Satan knows he has gained the upper hand as our culture continues its moral downgrade, and is working overtime to hasten it.
“IS OBAMA CREATING A PRO-GAY BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA?, “
Leave out the words CREATING and SCOUTS, and then I’d say... yes.
Outside of legal tangles over being of age when it’s close (e.g. 18 year old boy, 16 year old girl) there certainly are dirty old men who just like girls. Homos hog the spotlight today.
They don’t want a pro-gay Boy Scouts, they want to destroy the Boy Scouts.
If they had their way and there were openly gay BS leaders, no parent would ever send their boy to the Scouts and the organization would fold and that’s what they want.
They are not only gays but statists and no youth organization must exist except those organized by The State.
Hitler Youth, The Komsomol.
Just like gays and lesbians don’t want to be pastors in the mainline churches, they want to destroy the mainline churches and confiscate their property, as the Episcopal church has done.
Judging from all the queer so-called "Pride" parades yesterday, we're mighty, mighty close.
On my honor, I will do my best
to do my duty, to God and Country,
by standing up and being a real American,
and removing the filth and vermin from our streets,
by removing the filth and vermin from our government.
Remove James Turley from the board.
They are “officially” a political advocacy and think tank group. Current US law does not prohibit organizations that attempt to influence mores and legislation. It becomes a Pandora’s box when you say it ought to, as the same thing could oppress Christian organizations that seek to open a greater public and legal acceptance of Christian expression in the public square.
This means spiritual death, which comes, were it not for God’s grace in salvation, to any who sin...
INCLUDING YOU!!!
I am concerned about you; you do not appear to have accepted Jesus Christ’s grace unto salvation.
Yep, just think of any issue which results in the human race depopulating itself and puts America in decline, and the democRAT party will champion it.
Also, the Old Testament — which in literality was addressed to a specific people group, the Jews — stands specifically under the New Testament as an illustration of righteousness. If you are telling us that it stands as instructions to Christians now to stone homosexuals — as “obedience to a heavenly father” — you are very sadly off the mark. It only served as the crudest shadow to Jesus Christ, the danger of spiritual death, and the Cross which brought the only real cure.
Here’s a hint: look in your concordance for “but you were washed.” You’ll find it if you aren’t just a huffer and puffer.
The pedophile concept is largely a legal construct rightly designed to protect children. It can be shown that in Medieval England the age of consent was twelve. The law evolved over the centuries. I think the age of consent should be 21.
Where would you find a basis for any age of consent, and why the government be involved. That should make for some interesting research. Why 21? Why not 30?
The basis is called judgement. Would you allow a six month old female child to have sexual intercourse with an 18 year old man? There obviously has to be a cut off at some point; so why not 21?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.