Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: Romney Flubbed Arizona Response
Rush Limbaugh Show ^ | Tuesday June 26, 2012 | Rush

Posted on 06/26/2012 3:32:54 PM PDT by Bigtigermike

RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, yesterday Mitt Romney blew it with the response to all the immigration rulings at the Supreme Court. And the Obama administration reaction to it. And the regime basically telling Arizona, "We don't care. We're gonna have spies tattling on you if you start stopping people," and so forth. Yesterday was a warning, I think. Yesterday was a red flag for the Romney team. Yesterday... And it's the first time in a long time. It's the first time I have thought this in a long time. The Romney team was not ready for primetime on this illegal immigration, the Arizona decision.

This is not the time to get too cocky. I know that the Romney campaign is basically saving it all up for after the Olympics, and I understand that. But this is too consequential a week. What's happening this week is going to have legs, and there will be memories associated with it. You can't live off of all of Obama's gaffes like, "The private sector is doing fine." You can't live off that forever. Had that decision happened in the fall on a debate night with Obama pandering away the way he was?

And if Romney's response yesterday had happened in a debate? It would have been a big win for Obama, for the community organizer. Now, health care is coming up Thursday, and it's time to get the ducks back in a row. I'm just saying, folks. I was a little surprised. The Romney camp has been superb. They've had their rapid response stuff ready to go. I know that there's fear about the Hispanic vote, fear of angering it and so forth. But unless we're gonna pander to 'em the way Obama does...

And if we do that, we're gonna lose. We can't outpander Obama. We can't promise a bigger government than Obama will promise. We can't promise that. Not with credibility. That's not who we are. We can't promise this kind of stuff. And if that's the attempt, as a defensive measure, so as not to offend them...? Well, then, fine. I don't think you offended anybody, but you didn't gain anything. And we are about gaining things. The future of the country is riding on this stuff. There's got to be more than a tepid response


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: aliens; arizona; cowardlyrinos; cowardromnwy; loserromney; obama; romney; romney4dnc; romney4obama; romneycare4u; romneytheweak; romneyvsconstitution; rush; rushlimbaugh; sb1070; talkradio; yellowromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Balding_Eagle
Wow, you are a bit touchy. Since I'm not a liberal I don't think I could manage a “liberal laugh”.

Personally, I am a Rush fan. I have him on in the background at work daily.

I've seen JR’s standard rules on profanity, etc. I've also seen posts by him about Romney (or other subjects) that made his position known in no uncertain terms. I've never seen a rule on Rush.

I HAVE seen some posters try to speak for JR. Briefly. If I was IBTZ.

Maybe you and JR go way back and you can speak for him. I don't know.

41 posted on 06/27/2012 9:14:57 PM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

BTW; I didn’t much care for the personal attack on Rush either, and he’s comparatively svelte these days.


42 posted on 06/27/2012 9:18:31 PM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: jdsteel

I doubt that JR even knows who I am, and I certainly wasn’t speaking FOR him, I was speaking ABOUT what has happened in the past to those who denigrate Rush on FR.

A long time ago JR had a thread about it too IIRC.

Unless JR has changed that ‘rule’, denigrating Rush on FR is risking your ability to post here.


43 posted on 06/28/2012 6:57:54 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (Liberals, at their core, are aggressive & dangerous to everyone around them,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Gotcha. Now I am off to scream about SCOTUS for a few minutes.


44 posted on 06/28/2012 7:23:32 AM PDT by jdsteel (Give me freedom, not more government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson