Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full title: Ann Coulter Saw This Coming -

Coulter predicted conservative outrage at Roberts a full seven years ago.

1 posted on 06/28/2012 9:19:47 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Nachum

I blame most GOP senators for always leaving their balls in the primaries. Once they get to DC they become eunuchs. If they had balls, they would always go full tilt for conservative judges and beat the hell out of any rat that goes after them.


2 posted on 06/28/2012 9:23:28 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

That’s nice. Nowadays Coulter is talking from the other side of the fence though.


3 posted on 06/28/2012 9:23:56 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

And Drudge is now talking about Roberts’ epilepsy...


4 posted on 06/28/2012 9:24:41 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Dennis Prager was talking about this on his show today. Anyone have Coulter’s full article?


5 posted on 06/28/2012 9:25:05 PM PDT by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Ann is sharp as a whip, but has been blinded of late by the Beltway...

Prescience is a gift- as is Liberty.

Do the right thing, dear.


7 posted on 06/28/2012 9:35:15 PM PDT by One Name (Go to the enemy's home court and smoke his ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

The warning signs were all there, and most of us, including me, chose to ignore them.....NEVER AGAIN!


9 posted on 06/28/2012 9:40:26 PM PDT by dfwgator (FUJR (not you, Jim))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Faith Hope and John Roberts (conservatives are accepting Roberts on a "leap of faith")

John Roberts: A Supreme Property Rights Disaster In The Making

10 posted on 06/28/2012 9:40:43 PM PDT by ImpeachRoberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Here's a question: There were undercurrents that Roberts might be gay during his confirmation hearings. There were pictures of Roberts with other male friends showing off a pizza that they had cooked, etc. There are now rumors that he may have been 'nudged'into changing his opinion. The dissent was written as a majority opinion, the opinion even referring to Ginsburg as writing the ‘dissent’. Is it possible that Roberts has been ‘nudged’
into changing his vote to keep some skeletons in the closet? I have no evidence but there have been rumblings in the past.
11 posted on 06/28/2012 9:43:08 PM PDT by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Soon we will see Harriet Miers billboards that say, “Miss me yet?”


12 posted on 06/28/2012 9:49:02 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Didn’t you get the memo....Ann is a RINO around here. /sarcasm.


14 posted on 06/28/2012 9:56:06 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Gerald Ford gave us John Paul liberal.

Ronald Reagan gave us SCALIA and two wishy-washy swing voters (Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy).

The first Bush gave us THOMAS and also David Souter (to cancel out Thomas on all the important votes).

The second Bush gave us ALITO and wishy-washy dud John Roberts after trying to give us Harriet from down the hall at the White House.

Romney should start vetting judicial candidates right now. No blank slates. No surprises. Start with Ann Coulter.


16 posted on 06/28/2012 10:05:48 PM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

Question coming to mind: Is there precedent for SCOTUS retiring/replacing during presidential lame-duck timeframes?


20 posted on 06/28/2012 10:28:16 PM PDT by C210N ("ask not what the candidate can do for you, ask what you can do for the candidate" (Breitbart, 2012))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
After hearing the decision yesterday, I once again thought of SC picks. Why is it that when a Repub President nominates and gets someone on the bench, half the time the person ends up a wishy-washy moderate that goes left. But when a a Dem President gets one of their own on the bench, that person stays left - never going right on any decision?

And while I am at it, let me rant a little bit. I live in Maryland so for decades my vote has never mattered - for President, Senate, House. Yet I thought yesterday that even if we had the reincarnation of Ronald Reagan, and he was able to win Maryland. And by a miracle of God we got Repub Senators voted in from Maryland, and replaced the leftists with conservatives, it does not matter. One guy in a black robe nullifies all of that. And it seems to be like professional wrestling - all planned and choreographed with just one person swinging the other way to prevent the pendulum swinging back to the Constitution.

What difference does it make?

27 posted on 06/29/2012 4:15:34 AM PDT by 7thson (I've got a seat at the big conference table! I'm gonna paint my logo on it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum

It’s ironic that Coulter now strongly supports the liberal socialist Mittens, the architect of Obamacare, for president.
That alone calls into question the credibility of her entire archive.


30 posted on 06/29/2012 9:45:58 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Nachum
Damn...she was precient

I remember when he was nominated. I like him but didn't have much info. I read one of her columns and wondered aloud....

31 posted on 07/01/2012 10:25:22 AM PDT by YoungBlackRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson