Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Not So Good News . . .
National Review (The Corner) ^ | June 29, 2012 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 06/29/2012 7:31:50 AM PDT by madprof98

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last
To: A'elian' nation
Don't neglect to draw parallels to KELO and Souter.
41 posted on 06/29/2012 8:32:11 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

—This argument is specious. —

It is not an argument. It is an observation.


42 posted on 06/29/2012 8:32:49 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: CSM

Either celebrate Independence Day or pay the Tax.............


43 posted on 06/29/2012 8:33:44 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone

“As for the tax thing, the congress has ALWAYS had this power.”

Wrong. They have never been able to tax INACTIVITY. They have had the power to tax the states (fair aportionment or whatever), implement excise taxes (tax activity) and tax income of any sort (16th ammendment.)

By instituting a new ability to tax INACTIVITY, we have just removed any remaining limits on the Federal Government. In addition, we have no legal remedy to fix this Constitutinal Crisis!

America died yesterday...she was already severely wounded, but we now have no legal recourse to “re-limit” the federal government’s reach.


44 posted on 06/29/2012 8:34:00 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Maybe for you, but it is part of traitor Roberts’ (fallacious) argumentation.


45 posted on 06/29/2012 8:35:25 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

All of these legal niceties ignore the precarious economic straits we are in. Teetering on the edge of the precipice, our only hope was for business to gain some short term hope had Obamacare been thrown out. The fact that now it will be at least seven months before any action to cripple or repeal will be undertaken may be the difference.

Unfortunately, big economic changes take at least six months to affect things - just enough to get Obama past election day. (then comes the crash)


46 posted on 06/29/2012 8:37:06 AM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Steamburg

—The people do need to take responsibility for the trash they elect to office. At the same time, I suspect that Judge Roberts has either by nefarious intention or by his wish to drop the ball back in our laps, has handed us the tools to reshape our government and nation, but only if we are willing to do the work ourselves. If we choose to pout, cry and whine about how unfair it is to have bad government rather than take back our government; so be it. We can be subjects.—

Yep. I think Roberts is trying to give teeth to the phrase “you get the government you deserve” and is telling us that if this ridiculous monstrosity survives, we have nobody to blame but ourselves, and we have a golden opportunity in just a few months to do something.

Let us see if we are up to the task.


47 posted on 06/29/2012 8:37:20 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: madprof98

I have already made several decisions about ObamaCare. First, I won’t cave and let them force me to buy something I don’t want or need at the present. Second, I won’t cave to the IRS and pay their “fine” (tax) for something I haven’t purchased. Finally, I will let them send me to prison for not caving to them.

If we all refuse to “buy” the insurance and pay the “fine”. there aren’t enough jail cells to hold the majority of America in prison.

Bobby Kennedy, years ago when he was the US Attorney General, said that civil disobedience is a necessary way to overcome bad and unfair laws.

Let’s find out.


48 posted on 06/29/2012 8:38:34 AM PDT by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WILLIALAL
Do you think Obamacare would have passed as a tax increase?

No. That's why it wasn't passed as a tax increase, it was passed as a penalty. Roberts did not rule on the law, he re-wrote it, using arguments advanced by neither party. It is a breathtaking judicial over-reach.

49 posted on 06/29/2012 8:39:58 AM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

“Roberts took the opportunity to slap down the voting public, rightfully telling US that it is our responsibility to elect people that represent our views. He is 100% correct on this count.”

And his statements to that effect within the decision itself was the truly sweet part of this.”

As a Representative Republic with 3 equal branches of government that were designed to provide CHECKS AND BALANCES on each other, our Chief Justice failed to perform his duty. The Court’s only job is to protect the individual from an over reaching federal government that is LIMITED BY THE USSC!

If Chief Justice Roberts is correct that it is not the job of the court to protect individuals from the voting public, then we might as well disband the court completely.

He failed to perform his explicit duty and should be held accountable.


50 posted on 06/29/2012 8:40:23 AM PDT by CSM (Keeper of the Dave Ramsey Ping list. FReepmail me if you want your beeber stuned.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
I don’t like where I’m taking this.

I think I can help you with that. Let's back up to your initial premise:

It’s a continuation of established & accepted tax law:
You pay $X unless you can demonstrate a qualifying deduction.

That isn't what the law said, nor is it what the government argued in defending it. As the dissent acknowledged, Congress undeniably has the power to tax, but they chose not to exercise that right in drafting this law. Roberts did not even rule on the law - he simply rewrote it.

And to think we all expected a conservative justice, if nothing else, would refrain from legislating from the bench.

VDH is right: there are no silver linings.

51 posted on 06/29/2012 8:44:38 AM PDT by PhatHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

It’s idiotic.


52 posted on 06/29/2012 8:50:52 AM PDT by Girlene (Chief AHat Roberts - should resign in disgrace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PGR88
There was nothing good about yesterday’s ruling.

I agree with you that there's nothing good about the ruling. However, I don't join the "gloom and doom" -ers here, either.

The ruling left plenty of doors opened to overturning and defunding Obamacare. Nothing is shut, yet. This is not a done deal.

I also think that it will galvanize the conservative base and (IMHO) will lead to a 2012 Conservative Landslide - but to ascribe this as a motive for Roberts' ruling is complete idiocy.

So, the ruling is awful. Will the world end tomorrow, though? Probably not.

53 posted on 06/29/2012 8:51:11 AM PDT by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
R.I.P. The American Republic 07/04/1776 - 06/28/2012

All hail the Empire!

54 posted on 06/29/2012 8:52:02 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
R.I.P. The American Republic 07/04/1776 - 06/28/2012

All hail the Empire!

55 posted on 06/29/2012 8:52:12 AM PDT by yuleeyahoo (Liberty is not collective, it is personal. All liberty is individual liberty. - Calvin Coolidge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

So true. Roberts was a stealth candidate and Bush got played. Now he has taken off the mask. There is very little good in this Obamacare ruling. Just pray Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg lives 15 minutes past Mitt’s swearing in so he can hopefully replace her with a strict constructionist like Scalia.


56 posted on 06/29/2012 8:53:07 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf

Perhaps your history is lacking. We DO NOT live in a country founded as a democracy. We live in a country founded as a CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC. Democracy is as you suggest mob rule. We live in a nation of shared powers and that was thrown away yesterday. Roberts in a cowardlt and traitorous act said if you don’t like it vote different. He assumed the power to write tax code. Between that decision and his position on the Arizona law he has effectively DESTROYED the ability of this country to remain free. Treason has specific consequences


57 posted on 06/29/2012 8:55:06 AM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary
"There might be an ignition point where the temperature reaches a critical stage required for a conflagration.Then again, it could all fizzle out.

The more outrageous and over the top the administration and their minions behave, the better chance that ignition point is reached.

In all honesty, despite the horrors inherent in any form of armed conflict, the patriotic, freedom-loving peoples of this nation WILL reach a "breaking point" at which their collective desire to avoid the horror shall be eclipsed by their seething hatred for the Marxist perversion of our country. I have prayed that it would never come to this, but I fear that prayer will not stave off the coming storm...

58 posted on 06/29/2012 8:55:06 AM PDT by EnigmaticAnomaly ("Mantra of the left: 'It's only okay when WE do it.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cuban leaf
—The people do need to take responsibility for the trash they elect to office.

The problem is most people cannot see the relationship between the trash we elect to office and the state our country is in. I am from California and you would not believe the percentage of people who don't even know that the state is in bad trouble economically, much less see a relationship between that and the leaders we elect. And getting getting these people out to vote is NOT the solution, I believe that would only make it worse.

59 posted on 06/29/2012 8:55:19 AM PDT by Reddon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: joe fonebone
they were granted and have always had this power

I can't see how that's the case when it took a Constitutional amendment to tax our income. I would think something like this (taxing us for NOT buying something simply b/c we draw breath) would at least take another Constitutional amendment.

60 posted on 06/29/2012 8:55:33 AM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-96 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson