To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Mark Levin SHREDDED this line of thought today. I am going with Mark. Roberts ruled based on politics not on Constitutionality. He is a traitor, IMO!
3 posted on
06/29/2012 9:09:13 PM PDT by
Anti-Hillary
(Under Romney's Governorship, MA. was the birthplace of gay marriage & socialized medicine in America)
To: Anti-Hillary
ANOTHER one who is trying to make excuses for treason. Probably another guy who KNOWS Roberts. Sheesh. When in doubt, I take the side of Mark Levin as well. BTW, Mark has known Roberts for a long time, and he didn’t hold his fire. God bless Mark Levin for putting his freedom over friendship! Bob
10 posted on
06/29/2012 9:12:56 PM PDT by
alstewartfan
(Two broken Tigers on fire in the night Flicker their souls to the wind. Al Stewart "Roads to Moscow")
To: Anti-Hillary
39 posted on
06/29/2012 9:30:55 PM PDT by
Baynative
(REMEMBER: Without America there is no free world!)
To: Anti-Hillary
Rush made it pretty clear today, with very concise reasoning,that this whole decision was absolutely fraudulant, and that it was fraudulant from day one, because our gracious judges allowed the bamist to argue two different avenues in getting their way...
our hope?....to be able to seat new judges who actually think the constitution means something...
then a revist to this crap decision...
81 posted on
06/29/2012 10:24:38 PM PDT by
cherry
(Catholics for Romney)
To: Anti-Hillary
How did the left get Roberts? Drugs,sex maybe a gambling debt was fixed.
perhaps he is promised a private meeting with Sarah Jessica...
Remember the Chicago machine is at work.
122 posted on
06/30/2012 1:23:06 AM PDT by
ChiMark
(chewed up his body for a decade)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
