Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pastor whose congregation dwindled after gay-marriage vote to close St. Paul church
pioneer press ^ | 6-30-12 | Frederick Melo

Posted on 06/30/2012 7:24:01 AM PDT by TurboZamboni

Grace Community United Church of Christ will close its doors this weekend, but the pastor who says his decision to publicly support gay-marriage rights unwittingly thrust it on a path toward financial ruin plans to find a new home for his small congregation.

He has faith that his flock will follow.

The Rev. Oliver White, 69, had hoped fundraising would keep the predominantly African-American church on St. Paul's East Side open after a Seattle investor demanded full payment on a high-interest loan.

But after a well-publicized Internet campaign raised only about $56,000 of the $200,000 the church needs to pay off its debt, White has decided to call it quits.

(Excerpt) Read more at twincities.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: baptist; blackchurch; church; closed; gay; gaymarriage; holderspeople; homosexualagenda; marriage; religiousleft; schism; ucc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last
To: Norm Lenhart
So please explain how it is that the exemption is a good thing in light of this very clear reality.

The exemption is a good thing because that is what society in the US (the people) decided to do long ago -long before the federal government was created and began amassing power at the expense of freedom. Yes, long ago before the fallacy called separation between Church and State was first mouthed and long before freedom of religion rather than being protected from government began being shunned by government and not even given a seat at the table in public, political, and legislative debate.

What you call an exemption for Churches is actually a protection from government. HOW can anyone consider the threat of being taxed worse than being taxed? Regardless, you believe the leftist view that Churches can not speak out -I do not. FURTHER I will never subscribe to your notion that the government grants any inalienable freedom and that one MUST PAY A FEE (e.g. be taxed) to be able to exercise that which the Creator has given us.

You need to rethink your premise on this -it is severely flawed. Now is the time to push back, NOT retreat...

41 posted on 07/05/2012 7:27:50 AM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

No, I believe that the threat of having their tax status revoked STOPS them from speaking out...thus the problem. The Govt threatens churches with BEING taxed to keep them silent. If they WERE taxed, the threat ends and they can speak freely.

No I don’t ‘want’ them taxed, but as long as the hammer is overhead, they are constrained.


42 posted on 07/05/2012 9:15:39 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson