The other thing is that he can’t run against the Supreme Court, which he was all set to do.
The other thing is that he can’t run against the Supreme Court, which he was all set to do.Correct.
Part of me wants to believe that Roberts did this to stick it to Obama. After all, there was that stumble during the oath-swearing at the inaugural. Maybe that meant nothing, maybe that meant everything. If it meant everything, it still doesn't excuse Roberts for his inexcusable dereliction of duty... and what it says about his willingness to roll the dice (WTF happens with all this if Obama wins re-election????) is chilling.
But nevertheless, the argument is out there and I can't entirely dismiss it: Roberts has shivved the ChoomMaster.
As a piece of suggestive evidence I offer this:
The Botox Queen said "let's take yes for an answer".
Why would she say that if it was an unmitigated good for her side?
Obviously, she doesn't think it is.
Neither does Palin (who I greatly respect), and neither does Morris (who's arguments I think often make sense).