Posted on 07/01/2012 7:29:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
Uh, the American people, based on polling, were largely against 0care before this partial birth abortion of a ruling.
"The commerce clause has been severely restricted. "
NOT TRUE. Chief Injustice Roberts only gave it a good talking to. The other four libs are quite happy with it and when they get a 5th vote they won't give a rip about Roberts' dictum.
"The true cost to America's middle class was unveiled"
Not by Roberts' ruling. The people already understood this and are against it - see point #1 - it's the same thing.
"Perhaps the most important thing of all, the Roberts' decision will likely hand Governor Mitt Romney a 40 state victory in the upcoming elections."
There are all sorts of ways for Willard to lose in the Fall. Roberts didn't hand anyone to the right of Nazi Pelosi anything other than a big FU.
I would say a decade at the most. Don’t think we will be here for another century. Not with this bunch running us.
Great analysis. Too bad it doesn’t apply to anything on the planet Earth.
You are correct.
Thus, Roberts, amongst the majority, was (on this issue) leading a parade and noone was following.
The vote totals are more accurately represented as an 8 to 1 vote rather than 5 to 4 vote.
The ONLY bright side to this is it flushed out all the Friends of the State who pretend to be on our side.
He turned it into a racial issue..... real smart..... when he said "They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race either in social or political relations, and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit "
The vote was 7 to 2, but Taney's decision drew 8 separately written concurrences or dissents!
This phenomenon is actually quite common. If you've ever been involved in the business of collecting bills, particularly large bills, you will have found that every now and then there's some guy who doesn't want to pay and he wants you to believe that he doesn't have to pay ~ even though the evidence is there that he owes the money.
This is what I call "someone who thinks he's discovered a new way to steal". Here we have Roberts actually suckering the main leftwingtards on the USSC to go along with his vote to uphold the law, yet they wrote dissents regarding his argument. Which proves that technique sometimes works ~ particularly with Leftists. They want the goodies, they'll cheat to get them ~ even steal candy from babies or tax the blind ~ yet they want other people to think they are innocent lest they be challenged.
No, folks, Roberts didn't invent anything new here ~ he simply lied to you, and you let greed get in your way.
This is the old Gypsy trick called "The Pigeon Drop" ~
On the wheel of intelligence, Roberts is so clever by half that he shot past ‘genius’ and wound up right back on ‘moron’.
The idea that the commerce clause has been restricted is BS. In order for it to be considered precedent it has to be part of the majority opinion which it wasn’t even though 4 other justices included it in their desent.
The Constitution got overturned! Obama got his signature legislation okayed by SCOTUS! The left is rejuvenated and this idiot is trying to tell us that it was really a deep dark secret plot to really get the bad guys in the end. What comic book is he reading. These kind of plots only work in grade B movies and children stories.
The fact is that now the federal gov’t has the constitutional right to tell the citizens of this country what they have to buy or be faced with a confiscatory tax. How is this for a plot. A law and order party gets into power and based upon their review of cost of providing police protection, it is cheaper and more effective for the populace to protect themselves. Therefore, everyone must purchase and be trained in how to use a handgun. Everyone must carry their handgun with them at all times, including children over the age of 6 years (eliminates pedophiles real quick). If anyone is caught without a hand gun in their possession or they do not own one, they will be taxed $5,000.00. This is the average cost to provide police response to an emergency that they could have handled themselves had they been armed. I wonder how fast the lib army would scream at this one. It would make the Tea Party look like a bunch of good honest American citizens. Oh, wait. . .
I think the point he was trying to make was that 5 billion in taxes, along with 5 billion in Medicare cuts, wasn’t enough.
I love how some folks can convince themselves that somehow or another they’re eating from the clean end of a sh!t sandwich.
There are a couple of things wrong with this thinking. The first is that Obama could win reelection, and the other, a little more subtle, is that Roberts did a job that wasn’t his to do. He became one more noisy cog of big government pushing partisan politics. Gee, these two things make me think of a third. Since everyone is doing their own thing, Obama doing whatever he wants, Roberts doing what he wants, it is foolish to anticipate future events according to the rules of the game. So, defending wrong acts from the hope that good things might happen in the future is, ...well, ...crazy.
“The Tea Party has been reignited. Grassroots groups have reawakened.”
When Romney wins or has taken a big lead, this will be used by the MSN as it is here, to be the reason for “igniting” and “awakening” the Tea Party.
The Tea Party was ALREADY very much awake and ignited. Granted, this will be a big boost to the movement, but to imply they were dormant is ridiculous. The Tea Party has been electing Conservatives in many primaries.
The elites don’t understand “The Tea Party”. They think it is some sort of “political party”, when it is actually a grassroots MOVEMENT. Most of the Tea Party soldiers have never been to a rally or an event. We are ready and waiting for the call to battle, election day.
“President is now stuck with the law, a Republican House, and a likely 50-member Republican senate in 2013”
Nonsense. If Obama wins reelection he’ll very likely regain control of congress and the the march towards socialism will proceed at a much faster pace.
If you are familiar with the congressional tactic of loading up good bills with pork and other unrelated “riders”, you should also be aware that the same tactic has just been introduced into Supreme Court decisions.
Obamacare is LOADED with unconstitutional law... it’s not just the mandate.
By NOT ruling the entire law unconstitutional, Roberts has EFFECTIVELY (if not technically) ruled the ENTIRE healthcare law constitutional.
Don’t believe me? Watch what happens in the media when the bill is re-challenged in court.
Everyone is focusing on the mandate, but they fail to see the ramifications of other provisions such as the establishment of religion through the exemption clause.
If SCOTUS fails to re-address this ruling, the constitution is effectively TOAST!
F* Roberts. The American people shouldn’t have to rely on fate, cosmic interference, economic reality, alien invasion, or whatnots for a montrously bad bill to die, with the country going down with it. CJ can not tell if it is constitutional, then he/she is way over his/her head. Sir Napsalot on June 30, 2012 at 5:20 PM
I agree that the decision was a win, but not for the reasons this apologist lists. It was a win because we tacitly got the truth: the game is rigged. So long as we play it we’re stuck in a political equivalent of 3 card monte. Our choices if we wish to win are to either change the rules or walk away from the game and play a different one.
The only folks who actually won anything here was the political establishment. Oh, and the secessionists.
This doesn't speak well of Romney.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.