[NoLibZone]

Dems don’t see distinctions between States and the Fed.

Reagan as a Governor signed legislation in California that he never brought nationally.

[RaisingCain]

“Dems don’t see distinctions between States and the Fed.

Reagan as a Governor signed legislation in California that he never brought nationally.”

---

RomneyCare was an abomination to the spirit and sense of the Mass. constitution too, and it went on to not only redistribute the wealth of the citizens of Mass., but also served to suck money from the other states through federal government funding.

Mittens can’t wiggle himself out of this proclaiming State’s rights.

[Jim Robinson]

Check the FR keyword: bondi:

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/bondi/index?tab=articles

Bondi’s already let it slip about her involvement with Romney’s new National Healthcare Task force which they plan on using to help states implement “good healthcare” systems a la RomneyCare:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2839689/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2839432/posts

ObamaCare bad. RomneyCare good. Ain’t socialism grand?

[Spunky]

"Dems don’t see distinctions between States and the Fed."

Yes and if the people of Massachusetts like to pay taxes so be it.

[Ohioan]

Dems don’t see distinctions between States and the Fed.

The party that once honored Jefferson & Madison was corrupted in the days of the New Deal by a mass entrance of Marxists & Fabian Socialists. Chuck Schumer seems to lean a bit more to the Stalinist or Nazi variety of Socialism, at least to anyone who remembers how he endeavored to justify the Janet Reno directed massacre at Waco, when he was in the House.

But, then that is only one of the tendencies that Schumer exhibits. Another is highlighted by your remark, quoted above. Under the Constitutional formula, issues of health, safety & morals, were left to the States. Legally, they have always been referred to as the "Police Powers." Outside the District of Columbia & the Federal territories, the Federal Government was not given any role whatsoever with regard to civilian health care.

One can not say whether it is just that Chuck Schumer does not understand this, or that he simply does not care. A former Congressman who defended the Federal Government butchering scores of people, in an effort to take their guns away, has no more interest in legal niceties than did a Stalin or Hitler, in times not so far past.

Or does anyone think I am mischaracterizing the fellow?

William Flax