Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kazan; Norm Lenhart
Au contraire, I would prefer a Reagan like candidate, but guess what? WE DON'T HAVE ONE!!!!!It's also true most of us would do anything to be back with the RINO squishiness of the two Bushies. I didn't like some of what they did, but it's not full throated anti-US, full throated Marxist crap.

That you guys don't know the difference is astonishing. And quite honestly very stupid.

I hope you enjoy trying to reelect Hugo Chavez Jr. I'm sure he'll be totally restrained during his second term....../s

394 posted on 07/04/2012 10:34:43 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt, the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]


To: Lakeshark

We don’t have one because people like you keep voting for the libs the GOP pushes on us. The more we vote for them, the more they offer up for us to vote on.

Lake, do yourself a favor and read up on cause and effect before embarrassing yourself any further on all these threads. I don’t like making you look bad, but you are doing this to yourself.


395 posted on 07/04/2012 10:39:09 AM PDT by Norm Lenhart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
Au contraire, I would prefer a Reagan like candidate, but guess what? WE DON'T HAVE ONE!!!!!

Only because I'm not yet old enough to be president. ;)

461 posted on 07/04/2012 10:53:47 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
I would prefer a Reagan like candidate, but guess what? WE DON'T HAVE ONE!!!!!It'

Instead, we have a candidate more liberal and more untrustworthy than George W. Bush. So, what do you that is going to result? The country will continue to move to the left, with youe vote. And, we'll end up with repeat of what happened in 2006 and 2008 where Republicans lost Congress and then the White House. Wash, rinse and repeat.

You can't advance conservatism by voting for a liberal Republican. A liberal Republican will advance liberalism. How many more times does that have to be demonstrated before it sinks in?

Putting Romney in the White House means eight more of years of the nation drifting to the left and eliminates a chance of putting a conservative like Scott Walker in 2017.

466 posted on 07/04/2012 11:21:37 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

To: Lakeshark
It's also true most of us would do anything to be back with the RINO squishiness of the two Bushies.

So, you want more failed policies that inflate the debt, put more liberal judges onto the courts and result in Democrats taking back control of Congress and, ultimately, the White House?

This conservatives keep electing Republicans and country keeps getting more and more liberal.

And, the Republicans will continue to sellout conservatives because they know people like you will vote for any candidate they put up.

468 posted on 07/04/2012 11:25:20 PM PDT by Kazan (Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson