Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/05/2012 10:03:17 AM PDT by privatedrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: privatedrive

I totally disagree with this if Obama has anything to do with appointing them.


2 posted on 07/05/2012 10:06:05 AM PDT by RC2 (Buy American and support the Wounded Warrior Project whenever possible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

That you Mr.Roosevelt? Thought you was dead.


3 posted on 07/05/2012 10:08:51 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

>>Time to Increase Number of Supreme Court Justices<<

That’s a dandy idea. Can this really happen? If so, I’ll be writing my reps and senator.


5 posted on 07/05/2012 10:08:56 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

GOOD! THATS BRILLIANT!! Letsdo it right now like You suggest so that Obama gets to appoint 6 more Terrorists to the Bench before he leaves! BRILLIANT!!


6 posted on 07/05/2012 10:11:16 AM PDT by True Republican Patriot (May GOD SAVE OUR AMERICA from ALLAH and his Prophet, HUSSEIN OBAMA!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

"I like your idea!

7 posted on 07/05/2012 10:12:43 AM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

Totally disagree. If you add more justices, they’ll just vote based on coalitions. The outcomes will be the same.


10 posted on 07/05/2012 10:15:45 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Ubi Petrus, ibi ecclesia, et ubi ecclesia vita eterna!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

There are already too many idiots on the public dole writing irrelevant side opinions.


11 posted on 07/05/2012 10:15:52 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

No, it is time to abolish the SCOTUS.

They have failed in their duty to protect the constitution, and rewarding them by increasing the number of justices is STUPID.

If they refuse to do their duty, then their is no reason for it to exist, beyond that, I will never obey anything it decides again, so what really is the point of it existing?


17 posted on 07/05/2012 10:22:19 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

We don’t need for justices. We need a super-majority of strict constructionists. I would say 7 would be the minimum — or even 8. That way when one or two go wobbly, the whole nation doesn’t have to pay the price. No More John Roberts! No More Souters!


18 posted on 07/05/2012 10:23:43 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

We don’t need MORE justices. We need a super-majority of strict constructionists. I would say 7 would be the minimum — or even 8. That way when one or two go wobbly, the whole nation doesn’t have to pay the price. No More John Roberts! No More Souters!


19 posted on 07/05/2012 10:23:55 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

No!


20 posted on 07/05/2012 10:24:57 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

You might be opening a can of worms we’d rather keep shut. Didn’t FDR look at trying such a thing when he couldn’t get his socialist agenda through the courts?

I’m a little surprised 0bama hasn’t tried it already.


21 posted on 07/05/2012 10:25:23 AM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

The justices need to be term limited with no re-appointment possible. Ten year terms. The court is so politicized that even direct elections would be preferable to the current system. I also like the idea of Mark Levin that the congress could overturn a SC decision by a 2/3 margin in both Houses.


24 posted on 07/05/2012 10:26:50 AM PDT by grumpygresh (Democrats delenda est; zero sera dans l'enfer bientot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive; RC2
I totally disagree with this if Obama OR ROMNEY has anything to do with appointing them.
25 posted on 07/05/2012 10:28:19 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

AKA roosevelt........no thanks


29 posted on 07/05/2012 10:42:12 AM PDT by joe fonebone (I am the 15%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

Why not just admit that the USSC has become nothing more than a glorified legislature?

In doing so we’d be admitting that one of the branches of government is worthless and the Constitution is therefore invalid, but if we’re going to go to mob rule anyway we might as well skip the niceties and get it over with.


32 posted on 07/05/2012 10:56:44 AM PDT by gzzimlich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

Can’t increase the number of justices.
FDR tried to add an additional 6 in 1939 and Congress said NO.


35 posted on 07/05/2012 10:57:54 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (Repeal Obamacare, the CITIZENSHIP TAX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

I say drop the number of justices to four.


39 posted on 07/05/2012 11:27:27 AM PDT by Iron Munro (John Adams: 'Two ways to enslave a country. One is by the sword, the other is by debt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

I say we just trim it down to the 4 that understand the job they where tapped to do.


41 posted on 07/05/2012 11:53:27 AM PDT by cableguymn (For the first time in my life. I fear my country's government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: privatedrive

The number is irrelevant as there will always be an ample supply of people more than willing to put political views ahead of the US Constitution and the US Citizens.

What we need a 9 judges who have shown to have a full and complete understanding of the Constitution as INTENDED not what they would like it to say.

These judges need to use the owner’s manual, known as the Federalist Papers to erase any last vestiges of political bias and to insure they know how, what and why the Constitution was written and the intent of the founders to finally give the world a country with a LIMITED government. LIMITED government is one of the most important concepts and one that the black robed political hack lawyer morons seem unable, or more than likely, unwilling to grasp.


45 posted on 07/05/2012 12:17:02 PM PDT by Wurlitzer (Nothing says "ignorance" like Islam!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson