To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas; S; tobyhill; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy; ...
RE :”
That statement could be interpreted to mean “what he was doing” was to destroy federalism,...”
Destroy???
As I recall when Republicans were in charge they thought federal power was a GREAT thing because THEY were in charge of it. But don't worry, with Romney we won't have that problem right?? After all his main excuse for Romney-care is Federalism so he must mean it.
I didn't vote for Roberts did you?
21 posted on
07/06/2012 8:39:06 PM PDT by
sickoflibs
(ABBBO chant: "We must support Romney because he doesn't matter." (Obam-ney Care is bad now ))
To: sickoflibs; tobyhill; stephenjohnbanker; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy
RE :That statement could be interpreted to mean what he was doing was to destroy federalism,...
Destroy??? As I recall when Republicans were in charge they thought federal power was a GREAT thing because THEY were in charge of it.Yes, RINOs wound the Constitution too, but that does not make it OK.
I'm not the only one concerned about Federalism and the Roberts ruling. Column: Court's top conservative kills federalism
Remember Obama's State of the Union in which he lectured the SCOTUS, and the barrage of leftist warnings about overturning Obamacare? They will see the Roberts ruling as the green light for more big government lawlessness. The Constitution may win eventually, but we are headed in the wrong direction at this moment.
23 posted on
07/06/2012 11:13:41 PM PDT by
ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
(Fool me once, shame on you -- twice, shame on me -- 100 times, it's U. S. immigration policy.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson